Oh that's straight out bull. In cases where it's been relevant, I speak loudly about the rights of males. I'm a humanist, I advocate equal rights, truly equal, and I don't hesitate to bitch women out for slamming on guys and stereotyping. One of the issues I speak out loudly on is the right of males to not have their genitals cut up just because society deems it okay and them tough enough.
And as you should very well remember from our debate on that subject, I don't need people advocating protection from something that not only did I go through, but I don't think is a big deal as many others would like to make it out to be.
And there doesn't need to be rights of protection towards "genitals being cut up" because it's a decision made by the parents involved, just like an abortion, or an adoption.... the parents decide what is best, even if you don't think it is. It all falls under the same situation where the topic is devided due to various morals.... be that personal or religious..... no one solution will fit the equation for everybody.
Not every male get's a circ.... then again, there are some who still do. I have, and my child will most likely as well, based on my own decision in the matter in relation to hygiene and other factors...... not because of some religious writting in a book.
And comparing male
circumcision to female is one bad way to compare pros and cons, since female circumcisions cause a lot more physical and eventually mental truama then some flap of skin you won't even remember being removed as an infant.
You may not have been around for any of these sorts of discussions, but that doesn't mean they don't take place Prax, and you assuming that no one stands up is just as ignorant as them assuming they don't need to.
I'm just expressing the equal ignorants I have seen in some comments in here and showing the contradictions through posting the other pieces to the puzzle. We currently have people point out that men now a days are more apt to ditch their girlfriends or wives once a kid comes into the picture, because they don't have any responsibilities.... then we have comments towards how those men ditching somehow.... from what I can only gather, is related to the original news article posted about the woman killing her baby and chucking it into a dumpster..... and leads me to believe that somehow the blame for that is being placed on men, since there wasn't very much talk about her
"better half" in the article..... which is the only reason why I could see it being brought up in the first place.
And then we have the talk about woman's equal rights groups pushing too far to the point now that apparently men have this scape goat where they don't have to worry about anything because woman now have too many rights.... which I hardly can understand how that is possible.
Not to mention the whole
"Forced Marriage" being a wonderful idea so that men are somehow locked into staying in the relationship to own up to some moral responsibility being expressed in this thread.... as if that has ever made any houshold a positive environment.
Quite frankly, there's a lot of jumping and tip toeing about how men apparently are the weak link in this structure of a good family and somehow preventing women from tossing their babies into compost bins for the birds, where there hasn't been any information relating to any involvement, be that positive or negative by the male in relation to the situations at hand..... and to me.... that's what I find as ignorant, generic..... not to mention unfounded.
Not to mention, my comment towards society in regards to the male's role wasn't directed to you in the first place, but was one of those generic examples I wanted to throw out there to get the same reaction you just gave me, which I have been giving thus far in this debate, and it worked......
.... because when I hear someone start to blame men in general for some problem that takes two to tango, it's no different.