Might we witness a new Pan-Arabism?

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
Pan-Arabism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I know historically Pan-Arabism was strong, though held back by national dictators. It did eventually die down mainly because the regimes could never fully agree on anything. However, could the current unrest that deposes these regimes potentially reignites the hopes for a new Pan-Arabism?

What would be the consequences of this for the world? And what would be Turkey's and Iran's and Israel's response to such a massive integrated neighbour at their borders. At least Turkey and Iran are Muslim so might still be able to strike a friendship or at the very least diplomatic cordiality with any new Pan-Arab entity. Israel might be able to gather international sympathy if it retreats to within its pre-1967 border, otherwise I could see accusations of Israeli occupation potentially becoming a rallying cry for such a new Arab entity.

The good news for Israel is that democratic countries are more cautious with their taxpayer money and so such a new and more democratic pan-Arab entity might not be so gung ho about war with Israel. That doesn't mean though that it would not be a power to contend with on the worldwide diplomatic front, especially when we consider where many of the world's petroleum resources are situated.

So what would be the potential consequences, good or bad, of a Pan-Arabist revival? Would it be a religiously based or secularist revival, or possibly a religio-secular revival? What would be the economic impact of the birth of a new Pan-Arab market? How would Iran and Turkey, both Muslim but neitehr Arab states, respond? And Israel?

And the rest of the world?

Any thoughts?
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,117
14,637
113
Low Earth Orbit
Do you really think a whack of Kings and Sheiks are really going to give up their domain to a democratic body?
 

Trotz

Electoral Member
May 20, 2010
893
1
18
Alberta
I wouldn't mind some PPV footage of Abdullah of Saud undergoing the Guillotine.

Unfortunately, everyone in the Middle East is going to blame ordinary Europeans, Americans and Israelis for the policies of their politicians who arguably rule without consent on issues such as foreign policy in the Middle East and Central Asia.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,117
14,637
113
Low Earth Orbit
Really? I thought decent politicians in these countries didn't have any money from their resources to properly bride their voters with social programs and quality of living improvements.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
67
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
''could the current unrest that deposes these regimes potentially reignites the hopes for a new Pan-Arabism?''

No chance - too much tribal rivalries and denominational sectarianism. It is easy to forget that Islam has as many if not more denominations than does Christianity. Therefore, there will be no unity among them.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Yep, I vote with gopher. Pan-Arabism is about as likely as Pan-Caucasianism and Pan-Orientalism. The revolutions apparently underway in north Africa and parts of the Middle East might reignite hope for it, but it's not going to happen.
 

Trotz

Electoral Member
May 20, 2010
893
1
18
Alberta
Really? I thought decent politicians in these countries didn't have any money from their resources to properly bride their voters with social programs and quality of living improvements.

I think you could have a point for Egypt, Tunisia and Yemen but make no distinction but people in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, unless you are a Pakistani or Filipino slave labourer, arguably have better social programs and security nets than us Canadians.

The problem with an autocracy is that dissent within the system continues to build and is never alleviated, unlike in a democracy where a despised leader can be voted out, until the autocrat dies or is tossed out in a revolution.
 

The Old Medic

Council Member
May 16, 2010
1,330
2
38
The World
The people are revolting against both strict Islamic governments, and ones that are not. They want freedom of some sort, which is not a bad thing.