Rubber plantations are there - owned in France and rolling down your local InterstateI'm simply saying that I didn't tell you exactly what you said I told you.
Do they make them over there now? I thought that was a Brit company.
Rubber plantations are there - owned in France and rolling down your local InterstateI'm simply saying that I didn't tell you exactly what you said I told you.
Do they make them over there now? I thought that was a Brit company.
I'm simply saying that I didn't tell you exactly what you said I told you.
rofl....riiiight.
Rubber plantations are there - owned in France and rolling down your local Interstate
I'm sorry Gerry... but where did I say that to you?
.
The laugh and right is for your dancing answer. It's what I expect from a former soldier. It's what I get from Bear and RCS. I wouldn't expect anything else from you.
A war is not the soldiers fault, they were just following orders, it wasn't the publics fault, they didn't all vote for those in power. It wasn't the politicians fault, they were just doing what the electorate wanted them to do, and based their decisions on the best possible information they had at the time.
In other words, nothing is ever anybody's fault.
I wouldn't expect anything else from you.
.
so, anything and everything the military does can be blamed on the civilian population. I just want to make sure I have this right before I continue.
hPropaganda: their lies.
Public information: our lies.
People did what they thought necessary to end that insane war. If Jane deserves hanging then so do those who perpetrated it and who profited from it.
As you know, Gh likes to bag on the States, a lot. In so doing he lumps every American in one big pot. RCS and I have tried to explain that not all Americans are the same, nor do they all follow lock step with the gov'ts policies.Correction... former Marine.
A war is not a soldier's (sailor, Marine, etc) fault. He goes where he is told.
It IS a nations "fault" if they elect a government that does screwed up things domestically and internationally.
So again... where did I say that to you, or would you like to continue your dance?
Yeah... you might want to sleep on that tonight.![]()
Correction... former Marine.
A war is not a soldier's (sailor, Marine, etc) fault. He goes where he is told.
It IS a nations "fault" if they elect a government that does screwed up things domestically and internationally.
So again... where did I say that to you, or would you like to continue your dance?
Yeah... you might want to sleep on that tonight.![]()
In most cases it is civilians who start and direct the object of the war. Two soldiers standing out in a cold field have nothing against each other and nothing to do till the civilian direct the government what they want. Look who starts wars, groups of old men who start the war and leave the fighting fot thr younger lads.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/28/world/asia/28seoul.html
As you know, Gh likes to bag on the States, a lot. In so doing he lumps every American in one big pot. RCS and I have tried to explain that not all Americans are the same, nor do they all follow lock step with the gov'ts policies.
He's now trying to twist that, into something that has never been said.
Cool. I'm glad to here that.Considering you have not been around that much this last year, I will let this slide. I have toned down my "rhetoric" considerably concerning the u.s. as of late.
I think the general populace was still hurting from 9/11. Not to mention the faulty intel from Germany on WMD in Iraq.Your finally statement does not follow reality, as I have pointed out to both you and RCS. The republicans enjoyed a significant increase in the first mid terms after Bush's initial election and then Bush was elected to a second term after his government went into Iraq, obviously the american people were more than happy with the direction their politicians were taking them.
Cool. I'm glad to here that.
I think the general populace was still hurting from 9/11. Not to mention the faulty intel from Germany on WMD in Iraq.
My point as always, is that lumping the whole of the US into one big pile is erroneous.
Yes, when the US went into Veitnam they had marginal public support. But as the media war went on. That support dwindled.
Unfortunately, once war is started, you just can't turn it off, because the populace changes its mind.
I agree, which is why the US should have stayed out of Iraq. But those are just our opinions. Mines based on the fact that, hind sight is 20/20 and I know the Saddam had no real ties to Al Qaeda, and the WMD, was someones fairytale. Easily swallowed by a bruised nation.I don't buy the "faulty intel" excuse at all, and considering Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11 and was one of the few secular states in that region..........
For you maybe. But it was very real for Americans..............9/11 excuse is a non starter.
To be honest, I can think of a litany of reasons to not go to war. Yet only one to go to war.Hmmmm...... seems like a pretty good argument against war.
I agree, which is why the US should have stayed out of Iraq. But those are just our opinions. Mines based on the fact that, hind sight is 20/20 and I know the Saddam had no real ties to Al Qaeda, and the WMD, was someones fairytale. Easily swallowed by a bruised nation.
For you maybe. But it was very real for Americans.
But you weren't the target. So I would imagine you'd have a different perspective. Sometimes when emotions are running high, people don't make the best decisions.I know what information I was getting from different news sources on the build up towards the Iraqi invasion. No where did I hear or see hard convincing evidence. The american people, I assume, would have the same access to the same information I had.
Not by me.But then again, I was told, at that time, I was a dupe for the tinfoil hatters, a traitor to my nation and western values. An apologist. A coward.
Now, I have no intention of digging through the last 4 or 5 years, at least, of posts concerning america and the Iraq war and the Vietnamese war, to point out ALL the instances where I have been told that the american people were not responsible for those wars or what happened there. This flies in the face of what you are saying now.
I know what information I was getting from different news sources on the build up towards the Iraqi invasion. No where did I hear or see hard convincing evidence. The american people, I assume, would have the same access to the same information I had. But then again, I was told, at that time, I was a dupe for the tinfoil hatters, a traitor to my nation and western values. An apologist. A coward.
I was under the impression that pretty much anyone who was capable of thought understood at the time that the WMD and Al Qaeda stories were utter BS, and that the reason the US went to Iraq was to get rid of Saddam, under whatever pretence they could flog on the world stage.