MAGA Hero Stands Up for His Rights

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,441
9,586
113
Washington DC
Dylann Roof, the unabashed white supremacist who shot and killed nine black parishioners at a South Carolina church two years ago, says he wants to fire his attorneys because they are Jewish and Indian.
Roof, who was sent to death row for the June 2015 massacre at a historically black church in Charleston, said it's "quite literally impossible" that he and the two public defenders appointed to handle his appeal could have the same interests relating to his case.
"Because of my political views, which are arguably religious, it will be impossible for me to trust two attorneys that are my political and biological enemies," Roof said in a handwritten, three-page motion filed Monday in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit.
The 23-year-old added that the ethnicities of his attorneys, Alexandra Yates and Sapna Mirchandani, are "a barrier to effective communication."
The court will review Roof's motion and decide whether he should be appointed new attorneys. Yates and Mirchandani did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Roof has been on death row since a jury convicted him of dozens of charges, including federal hate crimes, for the deaths of nine parishioners who had invited him into their Bible study at Charleston's Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church.
Federal prosecutors said Roof committed the massacre to try to start a race war, and they presented as evidence his videotaped confession, in which Roof made no effort to deny the killings.
The two-hour video, played during the third day of Roof's trial in December, showed him calm — laughing at times — as he confessed to the deadly shooting rampage. He was nonchalant when he explained to FBI agents why he chose to gun down six women and three men.
With a few swift motions of his right arm, he demonstrated how he pulled out his .45-caliber Glock and opened fire — taking 77 total shots.
"Well yeah, I mean, I just went to that church in Charleston and, uh, I did it," Roof told agents when they asked him to explain what happened.
Roof wavered briefly when the agents asked him to describe exactly what he had done.
"Well, I killed them, I guess," he said.
He also tried to justify the killings, saying what he did was "so minuscule" to what black people are "doing to white people every day all the time."
"I had to do it because somebody had to do something," he told the agents. "Black people are killing white people every day on the street, and they are raping white women."
Prosecutors also introduced Roof's jailhouse journal, in which he wrote that he does not regret what he did.
"I have not shed a tear for the innocent people I killed," he said.
Roof's new court filing isn't the first time he has complained about his attorneys.
During his trial, he sought to drop his defense attorney, David Isaac Bruck, whom Roof threatened to kill if he got out of jail. Bruck is also Jewish.
Roof sought to argue on his own behalf during the trial's sentencing phase, a portion of a capital murder case during which defense attorneys argue for a more lenient sentence. A judge later determined that Roof was competent to represent himself as long as his legal team was on standby.
In the handwritten motion filed Monday, Roof said Bruck's Jewish heritage "was a constant source of conflict" despite Roof's efforts to "look past it."
The "difficulties" at his trial, Roof argued, should justify removal of his public defenders, who are serving as his appellate attorneys. He said his appeal "should be worked on and written by lawyers with my best interests in mind."
Roof was also charged at the state level. He avoided a second death penalty trial after pleading guilty in March to nine counts of murder, three counts of attempted murder and a related weapons charge. He was given nine consecutive life sentences in April.
Court records unsealed in May provided a glimpse into Roof's mind. Experts who examined him said he was less concerned over his own fate and worried more about whether certain family members were eating together, how his cats were doing without him, what was written on his Wikipedia page and what he was going to wear in court.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-news:page/in-the-news&utm_term=.e47868a3e968


Somebody get this fine young American a Whopper an fries!


Y'know, there was a lot of bad behavior on many sides.
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
The death penalty? My goodness, where were all the proggy warriors protesting this obviously "draconian" punishment? After all it's not justice, it's just state sanctioned murder.
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
You must be Canadian.
You must be colour blind. ;-) I fully support the death penalty when there's absolutely zero question at all that the accused did it. Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka should be dead right now. And Roof should just be dragged out back to have his skull's wind resistance reduced. None of this sitting in prison on the taxpayer dime for years making appeal after appeal. Just get it over with.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,441
9,586
113
Washington DC
You must be colour blind. ;-)
You must be delusional. Exhibit the First: you consider yourself the social superior of the Prime Minister of Canada. Exhibit the Second: you seem to think there's some huge anti-death penalty push among "the left."

I fully support the death penalty
Easy to do when your country don't have it.

Don't get me wrong, I support it too, and wish it was applied about 1000 times as often (and faster) than it is.
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
You must be delusional. Exhibit the First: you consider yourself the social superior of the Prime Minister of Canada.
That's funny considering a twit that got elected with 39.5% of the vote thinks he speaks for ALL Canadians. As if he is somehow my social and moral superior.
Exhibit the Second: you seem to think there's some huge anti-death penalty push among "the left."
They're the ones that have the biggest problem with it by far.

Easy to do when your country don't have it.
C'mon dude. Even you have to admit that was pretty weak. FunFact: Canada had the death penalty until 1976 when it was de jure abolished, except for certain offenses under the National Defence Act. Those were removed in 1998. So you see, I was around while Canada still had the death penalty. Although the last time it was carried out was a double hanging in 1962.

Don't get me wrong, I support it too, and wish it was applied about 1000 times as often (and faster) than it is.
I'm kind of with you. On the faster for sure. On the 1000 times more often, that all depends. I don't think the concept of "beyond reasonable doubt" is good enough anymore to be the focal point for a death sentence. As we've seen previously, some who were sentenced to death were later exonerated by advances in forensic technology.
I think it should only be an option where there is absolutely zero doubt that the accused did indeed commit 1st degree murder. Roof being a prime example of zero doubt whatsoever.
However, the "liberal" side in me also believes that once the death penalty is issued, the victim's families should be permitted to speak up as to whether they agree with the sentence or have it commuted to a life sentence. I say that since they are the ones most impacted by an act of murder. If they choose to show compassion for whatever reason then I believe their wishes should be respected in that regard.
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
Oddly enough, I had a relative who, as a journalist, covered a hanging; then, as an MP, voted to abolish it.


As he explained, 'Unlike many of you, I've actually witnessed a hanging, and that's why I'm against it'.
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
Oddly enough, I had a relative who, as a journalist, covered a hanging; then, as an MP, voted to abolish it.


As he explained, 'Unlike many of you, I've actually witnessed a hanging, and that's why I'm against it'.
There's other methods other than hanging that aren't so "brutish". But I agree hanging can be pretty nasty. Ideally, you want to break the neck instantly, but get the weight wrong and the condemned either gets to slowly asphyxiate or even more gruesome, his head just gets torn off.
Today they use lethal injection which is pretty much the same method used for now legal medically assisted dying.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
The death penalty? My goodness, where were all the proggy warriors protesting this obviously "draconian" punishment? After all it's not justice, it's just state sanctioned murder.

They will be out there the day they wheel him in for the needle. They attend just about every execution. Prior to that he will have many lawyers and advocates who are against Capital Punishment fighting to commute his sentence.

Oddly enough, I had a relative who, as a journalist, covered a hanging; then, as an MP, voted to abolish it.


As he explained, 'Unlike many of you, I've actually witnessed a hanging, and that's why I'm against it'.

I don't support Capital Punishment either.
 

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
Dylann Roof, the unabashed white supremacist who shot and killed nine black parishioners at a South Carolina church two years ago, says he wants to fire his attorneys because they are Jewish and Indian.
Roof, who was sent to death row for the June 2015 massacre at a historically black church in Charleston, said it's "quite literally impossible" that he and the two public defenders appointed to handle his appeal could have the same interests relating to his case.
"Because of my political views, which are arguably religious, it will be impossible for me to trust two attorneys that are my political and biological enemies," Roof said in a handwritten, three-page motion filed Monday in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit.
The 23-year-old added that the ethnicities of his attorneys, Alexandra Yates and Sapna Mirchandani, are "a barrier to effective communication."
The court will review Roof's motion and decide whether he should be appointed new attorneys. Yates and Mirchandani did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Roof has been on death row since a jury convicted him of dozens of charges, including federal hate crimes, for the deaths of nine parishioners who had invited him into their Bible study at Charleston's Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church.
Federal prosecutors said Roof committed the massacre to try to start a race war, and they presented as evidence his videotaped confession, in which Roof made no effort to deny the killings.
The two-hour video, played during the third day of Roof's trial in December, showed him calm — laughing at times — as he confessed to the deadly shooting rampage. He was nonchalant when he explained to FBI agents why he chose to gun down six women and three men.
With a few swift motions of his right arm, he demonstrated how he pulled out his .45-caliber Glock and opened fire — taking 77 total shots.
"Well yeah, I mean, I just went to that church in Charleston and, uh, I did it," Roof told agents when they asked him to explain what happened.
Roof wavered briefly when the agents asked him to describe exactly what he had done.
"Well, I killed them, I guess," he said.
He also tried to justify the killings, saying what he did was "so minuscule" to what black people are "doing to white people every day all the time."
"I had to do it because somebody had to do something," he told the agents. "Black people are killing white people every day on the street, and they are raping white women."
Prosecutors also introduced Roof's jailhouse journal, in which he wrote that he does not regret what he did.
"I have not shed a tear for the innocent people I killed," he said.
Roof's new court filing isn't the first time he has complained about his attorneys.
During his trial, he sought to drop his defense attorney, David Isaac Bruck, whom Roof threatened to kill if he got out of jail. Bruck is also Jewish.
Roof sought to argue on his own behalf during the trial's sentencing phase, a portion of a capital murder case during which defense attorneys argue for a more lenient sentence. A judge later determined that Roof was competent to represent himself as long as his legal team was on standby.
In the handwritten motion filed Monday, Roof said Bruck's Jewish heritage "was a constant source of conflict" despite Roof's efforts to "look past it."
The "difficulties" at his trial, Roof argued, should justify removal of his public defenders, who are serving as his appellate attorneys. He said his appeal "should be worked on and written by lawyers with my best interests in mind."
Roof was also charged at the state level. He avoided a second death penalty trial after pleading guilty in March to nine counts of murder, three counts of attempted murder and a related weapons charge. He was given nine consecutive life sentences in April.
Court records unsealed in May provided a glimpse into Roof's mind. Experts who examined him said he was less concerned over his own fate and worried more about whether certain family members were eating together, how his cats were doing without him, what was written on his Wikipedia page and what he was going to wear in court.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-news:page/in-the-news&utm_term=.e47868a3e968


Somebody get this fine young American a Whopper an fries!


Y'know, there was a lot of bad behavior on many sides.

If found guilty (is any evidence lacking?), I hope the regimental firing squad makes his death as painless as possible.