Macleans: Harper doing more harm than good to oilsands
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
... And they are all highly critical of AGW and the various hypocritical greenie organisations
flossy and gang are special people but their hands are clenched in fists of rage. :lol:
So if we miss the 2020 target that none of us agreed to will the sky fall? Or will China produce enough GHG to keep it up?
They may point out some activist groups, but they agree with the science.
Even the Toronto Sun accepts the science, though they have a fair share of OP Eds from freelancers like Shmezra Levant.
Time for Canada to renegotiate.
We can agree to keep increasing our output and emissions until we hit a peak as defined by having a national population of at least 1 billion people.
When we hit this mark, we will revisit the issue.
I'll do a non-binding, handshake, verbal deal on this.
Not as broadly as you would believe
We can agree to keep increasing our output and emissions until we hit a peak as defined by having a national population of at least 1 billion people.
When we hit this mark, we will revisit the issue.
I'll do a non-binding, handshake, verbal deal on this.
Not as broadly as you would believe
The first thought that sprang to mind when you referenced Macleans as a legit source on oil sands
The first thought that sprang to mind when you referenced Macleans as a legit source on oil sands
I found the Maclean's interview with Justin where says oil sands ain't going anywhere but bigger. It's what I'd do for the project my dad started.
Price of a bbl will move up before the end of the year. That and making the announcements of multiple pipelines being approved will heighten his already strong support
