LOL, that's like crying "Appeal to Law" when arguing case law.Well, offhand; circular reasoning - the plane was no good because it didn't make it to trials, but it didn't make it to trials because it was cancelled, but it was cancelled because the PTB thought it was no good.
Also, twisting what I did say into something you meant.
I'm not arguing that it was no good. You people are arguing it could have been great.
You're whole argument rests on the appeal to probability...
I've said all along, it never achieved anything that made it the legend Canadians have made it out to be, and rested on the facts.
Suck it up buttercup. Two can play with words.Also, twisting what I did say into something you meant.