Limbaugh's message to 'feminazis'

bluebyrd35

Council Member
Aug 9, 2008
2,373
0
36
Ormstown.Chat.Valley
In 2008, an estimated $1.9 billion was spent on publicly funded family-planning care — an investment that resulted in an estimated $7 billion in Medicaid savings for the cost of unplanned births.

Kind of puts the complaining about the public paying for "women's" sex in the category it belongs. Funny thing is, it takes male input to produce a child, but there are no adjectives for male ****s are there??
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
My understanding is that she would be paying for her own birth control through her insurance much like I am paying for my own "free" prescriptions through my Blue Cross coverage.


I see... So, if contraceptives were included on the policy, do you think that Flukes would be OK with paying an extra $1000 in premiums?.. You know, the actual cost of the pill?

So, it comes down to the University denying women insurance coverage based on religion. If one is required to pay for insurance, then surely one should have a say in what that coverage will to be.

The University is denying women anything on the insurance front.. It is the insurance company that has instituted the policy.. How is Georgetown Uni responsible for the insurer's policy. For that matter, why should the Uni or the Insurance company pay for Flukes' reproductive habits?
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
I see... So, if contraceptives were included on the policy, do you think that Flukes would be OK with paying an extra $1000 in premiums?
Why would she have to pay extra? Her insurance covers prescription medication up to $5000 yearly with co-pay...:roll:
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
I see... So, if contraceptives were included on the policy, do you think that Flukes would be OK with paying an extra $1000 in premiums?.. You know, the actual cost of the pill?

I can't speak for her but I know that if I had to pay the total cost of my dental and prescriptions, I probably wouldn't bother with insurance in the first place as it would kind of defeat the purpose. I think either...

A) You don't understand how insurance works in which case you should bone up on it before you continue with this discussion

or

B) You simply can't admit that you and Rush are completely and utterly wrong, so you are grasping at every conceivable straw.

or

C) It's a little bit of both.

Tell me, do you have insurance and does your insurance premium cover the entire cost of the services you receive and only the cost of services you receive.?

For that matter, why should the Uni or the Insurance company pay for Flukes' reproductive habits?

Why shouldn't they?

Birth Control and Health Insurance
The Facts

Over half of the states in the U.S. have enacted legislation requiring insurers that provide prescription drug benefits to also offer some birth control coverage. In 1998, women’s right proponents also won a major victory that required health insurance coverage for contraceptive drugs and devices for all federal employees. Many liken health insurers’ reluctance to cover contraceptives to their former hesitation to cover prenatal care. In fact, health insurers did not begin covering prenatal care until about 25 years ago. Here are some other interesting facts on insurance coverage for birth control:

  • 49% of large group health plans do not routinely cover birth control
  • 97% of large group plans cover prescription drugs, but only 33% of those plans cover oral contraceptives, which are the most popular method of reversible female birth control in the country
  • A paltry 15% of large group plans cover the five most common forms of birth control: oral contraceptives, diaphragms, IUDs, Depo Provera, and Norplant
  • Women age 15-44 pay 68% more for out-of-pocket healthcare costs than their male counterparts, largely due to the cost of reproductive healthcare
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Dead on. Limbaugh rarely has anything intelligent to say. His show, which is the intellectual equivalent of the WWE, thrives on controversy. Intelligent thought has very little do do with the poison that comes out of this idiot's mouth. In fact intellignet thought would be completely wasted on his core audience.
Yep. He plays to the low-average intelligence. It works for him. He isn't really an idiot, though. But he's not of above-average intelligence.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
Yep. He plays to the low-average intelligence.

But his fans point to his popularity as proof of his abilities. These same fans, incidentally, disappear when asked about Justin Beiber's and Britney Spears' popularity. I've always wondered why popular equals good in the infotainment industry but not in the entertainment industry.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Yep. He plays to the low-average intelligence. It works for him. He isn't really an idiot, though. But he's not of above-average intelligence.

Well, it seems advertisers are growing tired of the right-wing Obama is a socialist hatefest. First Beck started hemorrhaging advertisers, eventually losing his TV show on FoxNews, now he's only on the radio. Now Limbaugh is losing advertisers:
A 7th advertiser backs away from Limbaugh's show after he calls law student 'slut' - chicagotribune.com

And it's not like his ratings are going up...it's a bunch of old people who listen to that ideological shock jock talk radio. The median age is somewhere in the 55-65 range, and getting older and more grey all the time.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Limbaugh


Looks skilled at placing long round things in his mouth.
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
If I were an insurance company and covered abortion, you bet I'd cover any contraception simply because it's a lot cheaper than abortion.
Here's a little info about the effectiveness of contraceptive methods:
https://www.optionsforsexualhealth.org/birth-control-pregnancy/birth-control-options/effectiveness
and here's a little info on the costs of the various methods:
The High Costs of Birth Control: A Major Barrier to Access | RH Reality Check
and what the gov't thinks about contraceptives in comparison to pregnancies:
The economic value of contraception: a co... [Am J Public Health. 1995] - PubMed - NCBI

Abortion costs? The average cost for an abortion is $468 in the States. That's just the procedure minus the clinic visits and other stuff.

But his fans point to his popularity as proof of his abilities. These same fans, incidentally, disappear when asked about Justin Beiber's and Britney Spears' popularity. I've always wondered why popular equals good in the infotainment industry but not in the entertainment industry.
I never noticed. I'd say probably because individual choice about the various celebs overrides objective choice about celebrity issues. Like "my celebrity is next to perfect" but "the collective opinion of people must be accurate because so many people can't be wrong" sort of thing.

Well, it seems advertisers are growing tired of the right-wing Obama is a socialist hatefest. First Beck started hemorrhaging advertisers, eventually losing his TV show on FoxNews, now he's only on the radio. Now Limbaugh is losing advertisers:
A 7th advertiser backs away from Limbaugh's show after he calls law student '****' - chicagotribune.com

And it's not like his ratings are going up...it's a bunch of old people who listen to that ideological shock jock talk radio. The median age is somewhere in the 55-65 range, and getting older and more grey all the time.
So much the better, IMO. I think the idea that people are getting pretty annoyed with the amount of advertising they are being subjected to and that is what is taking a toll on advertising more than anything else, though. And advertisers are less willing to keep supporting the more extreme ends of opinion for fear of losing consumers. So losing female consumers because of stupid comments by editorial jerks like Limpbag is pretty much a taboo to advertisers.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
My understanding is that she would be paying for her own birth control through her insurance much like I am paying for my own "free" prescriptions through my Blue Cross coverage.
You pay for your own Blue Cross coverage?
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Why would she have to pay extra? Her insurance covers prescription medication up to $5000 yearly with co-pay...:roll:

Explain that to Cannuck. He's a little unclear on the concept

I can't speak for her but I know that if I had to pay the total cost of my dental and prescriptions, I probably wouldn't bother with insurance in the first place as it would kind of defeat the purpose. I think either...

You can answer that question yourself simply by looking into the business model that the Insurance companies follow, it's no big secret and it will go a long way towards providing you with a functional knowledge of the industry.

*Hint #1: Your 'free' prescriptions are not in fact 'free'
*Hint #2: The Insurance companies are not in business to lose money.

Let's see if you can connect the dots on this.


Why shouldn't they?

Why should they?
 

bluebyrd35

Council Member
Aug 9, 2008
2,373
0
36
Ormstown.Chat.Valley
I see... So, if contraceptives were included on the policy, do you think that Flukes would be OK with paying an extra $1000 in premiums?.. You know, the actual cost of the pill?



The University is denying women anything on the insurance front.. It is the insurance company that has instituted the policy.. How is Georgetown Uni responsible for the insurer's policy. For that matter, why should the Uni or the Insurance company pay for Flukes' reproductive habits?

Quite true!! In fact, the fight for inclusion of birthcontrol into insurance policies was being fought state by state, insurance company by insurance company for twenty years. Enough already, they pay for men's sexual and reproductive habits, and they save NO money there. Pregnancy is covered, so by preventing it is a bonus. So it is out and out discrimination. That is what the whole shmozzle is all about, not about cost, nor about Catholism but about control of the uterus. Good grief.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
If it wasnt about Catholisism, then why pick a Catholic University?
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
*Hint #1: Your 'free' prescriptions are not in fact 'free'

In my case they mostly are because, with three kids, I cost the insurance company far more than they collect from me. That's how insurance works.

*Hint #2: The Insurance companies are not in business to lose money.

Are you suggesting that providing a service that people want will make insurance companies lose money. Perhaps you can explain your business model to me?

Why should they?

It's called free enterprise. People want a service. A company steps up and provides it. Are you against free enterprise?

If it wasnt about Catholisism, then why pick a Catholic University?

Because she was a student there. Try and keep up Gerry.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Ya, you really should try to keep. She picked that university based on the insurance nit covering contraceptives. Big surprise that a Catholic University would want to make sure that an insurance policy it condones does not contravene Catholic policy.
 

critter171

Hey all from the USA
Feb 24, 2010
318
2
18
38
Usa, New hampshire
Limbaugh



Conservative and controversial radio host Rush Limbaugh is once again causing a furor, following comments he made earlier this week calling a Georgetown University law student “a ****” and suggesting she and her female classmates should post videos of themselves having sex if their contraception was subsidized.

Limbaugh made the comments following the appearance of Sandra Fluke, a third-year law student, at a congressional panel. Fluke testified on Feb. 23 about the Obama administration’s new policy requiring that employees of religion-affiliated institutions have access to health insurance that covers birth control.

She said students at Georgetown, a Jesuit university, pay as much as $1,000 a year for birth control because campus health plans do not cover contraception for women, the Washington Post reported. She also spoke of a friend who had an ovary removed because the insurance company wouldn’t cover the prescription birth control she needed to stop the growth of cysts.

On his Wednesday radio show, Limbaugh said: “What does it say about the college coed Fluke, who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex. What does that make her? It makes her a ****, right? It makes her a prostitute.”

He went on to suggest that Fluke distribute sex tapes of herself.

“If we are going to pay for your contraceptives, and thus pay for you to have sex, we want something for it,” he said. “We want you post the videos online so we can all watch.”

President Barack Obama phoned Fluke on Friday to express his support, spokesman Jay Carney said.

Obama considers Limbaugh’s remarks “reprehensible,” Carney said. He said the president called Fluke to “express his disappointment that she has been the subject of inappropriate personal attacks” and to thank her for speaking out on an issue of public policy.

“The fact that our political discourse has become debased in many ways is bad enough,” Carney said. “It is worse when it’s directed at a private citizen who was simply expressing her views.”

Obama reached Fluke as she was waiting to go on MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell Reports. “What was really personal for me was that he said to tell my parents that they should be proud,” a choked-up Fluke told Mitchell. “And that meant a lot because Rush Limbaugh questioned whether or not my family would be proud of me.”

Limbaugh was still defiant Friday. “Amazingly, when there is the slightest bit of opposition to this new welfare entitlement being created, then all of a sudden we hate women! We want ’em barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen,” he said on his show. “And now, at the end of this week, I am the person that the women of America are to fear the most.”

More than 130 Georgetown faculty members signed a letter praising Fluke for her “grace and strength” and condemning Limbaugh’s remarks. And Republican House Speaker John Boehner called Limbaugh’s remarks “inappropriate,” a spokesman said.

Calls for Limbaugh’s sponsors to pull their ads from his radio talk show rocketed through cyberspace, and at least two companies, bedding retailers Sleep Train and Sleep Number, said on their Twitter accounts that they were complying with the demands.

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

LOL This sh!t can't get any funnier.. Limbaugh is a nut bar.. and women who want to have sex.. Gad bless you.. more the merrier.
not insutling anyone but rush is just a moron the only people who listen to him are sheep who follow fox news.... that about it i hate riding with my dad in his truck sometiems cause he has rush talking but he no more than a pest in this case.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Quite true!! In fact, the fight for inclusion of birthcontrol into insurance policies was being fought state by state, insurance company by insurance company for twenty years. Enough already, they pay for men's sexual and reproductive habits, and they save NO money there. Pregnancy is covered, so by preventing it is a bonus. So it is out and out discrimination. That is what the whole shmozzle is all about, not about cost, nor about Catholism but about control of the uterus. Good grief.

Good luck in your quest.

I might suggest that you lobby the insurance provider on this as opposed to the University, you'll stand a much better chance of seeing tangible results.

It's called free enterprise. People want a service. A company steps up and provides it. Are you against free enterprise?


Finally, something from you that is founded in reality.

The problem for you is that it is the insurance company that makes the policy - not you.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
The problem for you is that it is the insurance company that makes the policy - not you.

That's not a problem for me at all. I can shop around and buy they policy I want. I'm not sure where you are doing business but you should think about going elsewhere.

If you and Rush want to buy insurance from a company that doesn't provide coverage for the pill, you are free to do so.