Regarding N's concept of an egalitarian society, there is nothing in the constitution about the process of health care delivery, nor is there any reference to money as a corrupting influence. The Supreme Court, as we all know, in fact gave a damning indictment of the Medicare delivery process.
This is the relevant section of the Bill of Rights:
1. It is hereby recognized and declared that in Canada there have existed and shall continue to exist without discrimination by reason of race, national origin, colour, religion or sex, the following human rights and fundamental freedoms, namely,
(a) the right of the individual to life, liberty, security of the person and enjoyment of property, and the right not to be deprived thereof except by due process of law;
It is generally understood that "race, national origin, colour, religion or sex" is an incomplete list of unreasonable grounds for discrimination. The right to life and security of the person is broad language which includes health care: proof of concept, the case you mentioned used this section to make a ruling on the inadequacy of the current makeup.
The question is whether the government has an interest and/or responsibility to homogenize the enjoyment of those rights to prevent discrimination based on class.
I really should read that case in detail...