Least Popular Prime Minister

Which PM was the Worst?


  • Total voters
    43
  • Poll closed .

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
I love this voting against someone because of whatever party they belong to. Childish, but friggin hilarious. Does Harper support terrorist organisations with Canadian supplies and money like aPAULing MArtin did? Does Harper balance the budget at the expense of seniors and students? Is he involved in some sort of multibillion $ scam? Did he write a "red book" full of promises in order to get elected and then reverse on every single promise while scoffing "Screw the Red Book... Don't tell me what's in the Red Book. I wrote the goddamned thing. And I know that it's a lot of crap." lmao
Has Harpy done ANYTHING that has a serious and deep deleterious effect on something? Or is just belonging to the Con Party enough?
 

mapleleafgirl

Electoral Member
Dec 13, 2006
864
12
18
35
windsor,ontario
His ideas are irrelevant in Quebec and he wiped out the Liberal Party in the West. So two of the four regions of the country wanted nothing to do with him.


wht has that to do with him as a prime minister? he changed the whole country and gave us a bold new direction for the future, and because of him we actually do not have to go to england anymore to change our constitution.he was the best thing that happened to canada, imo.
 

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
55
Oshawa
Maybe I should trot out the list of 100 Liberal scandals that we have over at CKA. Harper is the best thing that's happened to this country in 13 years.

My laundry list is only after one year, give them 12 more and we'll compare.
 

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
wht has that to do with him as a prime minister? he changed the whole country and gave us a bold new direction for the future, and because of him we actually do not have to go to england anymore to change our constitution.he was the best thing that happened to canada, imo.

He was despised in western Canada. His policies that supposedly made him great were vehemently opposed in that part of the country, so much so it destroyed his own party from which they've never recovered. How can he possibly be great when a significant part of the country so totally rejects him?

The constitution was never signed by Quebec. His vision of Canada was rejected in his home province and is a non-starter today. How can he possibly be great when a significant part of the country so totally rejects his vision for the country?
 

westmanguy

Council Member
Feb 3, 2007
1,651
18
38
I don't like Trudeau.. he was one of the worst:

He single handedly destroyed Alberta's economy and sent it into a deep recession with his NEP. He is the reason Alberta will never vote Liberal again.

The West hates him, and I hate him too.
 

gc

Electoral Member
May 9, 2006
931
20
18
I don't like Trudeau.. he was one of the worst:

He single handedly destroyed Alberta's economy and sent it into a deep recession with his NEP. He is the reason Alberta will never vote Liberal again.

The West hates him, and I hate him too.

Speaking of hating someone because of the party they belong to....why should Albertans still hold a grudge against the Liberals because of the NEP and Trudeau who is now long gone? If what you are saying is true, you are saying that Albertans hate anyone who is Liberal just because of something that happened in the past? I'd say there are other reasons why Albertans hate the Liberals....they simply aren't conservative enough.
 

westmanguy

Council Member
Feb 3, 2007
1,651
18
38
Alberta has been voting Conservative for years, and they had a full sweep of BLUE last election.

Alberta is Blue through and through.

And look how much they benifit: HUGE economic boom.

Liberals are good for social programs
Conservatives are good for the economy.

I put the economy over social programs.
 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
74
Ottawa ,Canada








karra
Quote:
Calling him an American lackey is typical liberal tactics. Could you explain how he is a lackey?
Alas, alors, colin de bin, by gar, an ess tea too - don hexpekt a hanser hany time soon. .___________________________

....a jak to po naszemu?
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
Lyin' Brian gave us about a fifty billion dollar deficit every year he was in office. The only surplus was his arrogance.

He needed the GST to pay the interest on the massive debt he accumulated.

Free trade was better for the Americans than for us.

I'm glad he worked on apartheid in Africa.....He should have gone there .....and stayed..

Tuesday 3 October 2000 LOCAL BUSINESS
Trudeau's economic legacy dismal

The 'Just Society' came about through aggressive taxation and government
spending that has saddled us with debt today.
Michael Campbell Vancouver Sun
In reading and watching all the commentary discussing the legacy of Pierre Elliott
Trudeau I was amazed at how one of his most lasting and profound influences is regularly
overlooked.
Certainly the repatriation of the Constitution and the creation of the Charter of Rights are
worthy of a great deal of discussion, but no less of a monumental legacy is his economic
policy.
Trudeau is the godfather of Canada's interventionist government policies regarding the
economy. It was Trudeau who spearheaded the drive for the "Just Society" through
aggressive increases in government spending and wealth redistribution that led to Canada
leading the world in the growth of taxation.
It was the Trudeau government that brought Canada's federal deficit from zero in 1968 to
$38 billion by the time he left office in 1984. It was the buildup of debt during the
Trudeau years that laid the foundation for today's $40 billion in interest payments.
While socialists or Marxists may like to take credit for the philosophical underpinnings of
his economic policy, it was Trudeau who put the thoughts into action.
In 1968 the federal government launched what was then called the short-term bailout of
the Cape Breton Coal company that finally this year, after $1.7 billion in subsidies, shut
down.
It was during the Trudeau era that employment insurance subsidies became a way of life
for some in the Maritimes with the results still well in evidence today.
Under Trudeau we got nationalization of companies and industries. Canada curtailed
foreign investment and exploded the government bureaucracy.
But his legacy extends beyond specific economic policies and into a mindset that
dominates the landscape today.
It was during the Trudeau years that the anti-business, anti-success attitude -- referred to
by Nobel Prize-winner Robert Mundel as the chief obstacle to our economic prosperity --
took hold and flourished.
Marketing all government policies as part of the pursuit of the Just Society has
permanently linked the concepts of government intervention and justice in many people's
mind.
We see the results today where opposition to extending government programs is regularly
regarded as a form of incivility at best and godlessness at worst.
As Prime Minister Jean Chretien has told us regularly, only the selfish and greedy want to
lower taxes. Only the most cold-hearted could oppose a national day-care program or
business subsidies.
What's interesting to note is that before we headed on the path toward the Just Society,
Canada had the second-highest economic output per person in the world.
The latest numbers from the OECD put us at 20th out of 29 in the developed world. Our
economy grew at an average pace of five per cent, excluding inflation, before 1968,
which is 40 per cent higher than the average since.
Our federal debt has grown from 0 to $750 billion, while our currency has gone from
being at par with the U.S. dollar to 66.5 cents today.
Also interesting to note is the fact that our satisfaction with government institutions like
health care and education has also declined in the past 30 years in spite of huge increases
in government spending.
As for the pursuit of the Just Society, poverty advocates tell us nothing has changed,
which always leaves me somewhat startled considering that so many Canadians continue
to call for more of the same policies.
Comments about this article? Send an e-mail to the writer.

Send a copy of this story to a friend. Click here.

http://www.vancouversun.com/newsite/business/001003/4621498.html
 

tamarin

House Member
Jun 12, 2006
3,197
22
38
Oshawa ON
Trudeau indeed was the father of the debt. A man contemptuous of Old Canada, its traditions and cultural institutions, he singlehandedly and singlemindedly, remade the country into one of his own choosing. When the country finally dissolves in the future, I can't see how he won't be given the lion's share of the blame.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
The working people of both the USA and Canada got screwed by Free Trade which rewarded corporate pigs, I can remember that lying bag of pus Mulboney promising hundreds of thousands of new jobs, and he delivered to, Tim Hortons and Macdonalds. Only the upper class profited from free trade nobody else.:wave: