So you mean his pay was over $50 grand a month? That makes no sense to me at all. (oooooooops I forgot about the "new math")
I believe the article said he had either 14 or 18 years of service.
So you mean his pay was over $50 grand a month? That makes no sense to me at all. (oooooooops I forgot about the "new math")
I believe the article said he had either 14 or 18 years of service.
Take a look at the government website and it tells you the pay of all the top civil serpents. Nanaimo for instance has six fire dept. officers that make over 100G a year. What politicians bilk us for is a mere pittance compared to the amount the legions of senior civil servants at all levels of government rip us for.
Yeah, I was a little remiss there, I was just counting the four years as chief. But having said that, I served for 35 years and got zero severence. My point being severence is bullsh*t.
If there is going to be severence it should be for every position from the floor sweeper to the C.E.O. as a percentage of their salary. That would still be wrong but at least it would be fair. It's time to put an end to the "fat cats"..........:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
hmmmmm..... so I guess the 3 months severance after 1 years employment I got from AT&T should have been turned down?
This is an outrage.