You're missing the point: they created the sh*tstorm, therefore it is absolutely on them.
How far do you think that would get in court? Actually they didn't create the sh*tstorm, the sh*tstorm was how others chose to take it!
You're missing the point: they created the sh*tstorm, therefore it is absolutely on them.
How far do you think that would get in court?
Actually they didn't create the sh*tstorm, the sh*tstorm was how others chose to take it!
.. They did create it... They made the decision to call under the guise of the Queen and family.. No one had a gun to their head(s) on this.
Did you never phone anyone pretending to be someone else?
A doctor is being interviewed on C.B.C. radio right now about this case. So far it has NOT been established that this is a suicide, it could be a heart attack or cerebral hemmorhage. His take on it is the whole thing has been overblown!
I understand that the police have not issued a statement that indicates what the cause is... But that is secondary to the issue that no one forced these 2 Australians to make that crank call.. They alone made the decision and they alone should shoulder the brunt of any fall out.
The notion that people 'do it' all the time is irrelevant; fact is, these 2 did it and if there are any consequences, they alone must pay that cost
I don't think they're to blame for the death
They're morning show shock jocks, their job is to be cutting edge funny.
I don't think they're to blame for the death, nor do they deserve to lose their jobs.
I understand that the police have not issued a statement that indicates what the cause is...
Well there ya have, Blackleaf says so.Yes, they are.
That isn't what they did, but I'm forced to ask...It's just a pity that a lot of modern "comedy" involves poking fun and making cruel and sick jokes against other peoples.
They still have those. I hear there's one at London SW1A 1AA, United Kingdom.It's reminiscent of the Victorian freak shows.
No it didn't. She killed herself.Such "humour" has become more and more prevalent in recent years and now it has finally killed somebody.
Not even remotely similar, other than being funny, somewhat.If we haven't learnt from the 2008 Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand affair that such cruel and sick pranks need to stop then maybe we will learn that from this affair.
There's enough real blame to go around, where needed. it isn't needed here.Good to see there is someone with a sensible "take" on this matter! There is already enough "fault" and "blame" in the world, without having to attach them to situations where NO ONE could have predicted a tragic outcome!
Not legally anyway.We're talking oranges and apples here, I'm talking blame for the death, you're talking breach of protocol! There is NO way they are to blame for the death.
Good thing that isn't what they did."Oh, I didn't know it was unethical to yell "fire!" in a mall and I didn't intent for anyone to get hurt, let alone trampled in the rush".
Unless it's in the publics interest."I didn't know it was unethical to look in the folder sitting on the doctor's desk and pretend to be a close relative of who the folder's files were about and spread the info around town".
So that means that what they did was ethical?Good thing that isn't what they did.
Yeah, the public knows nothing of this and hasn't an interest in ethics. No effect whatsoever on the public.Unless it's in the publics interest.
Does it have to be?So that means that what they did was ethical?
I was referring to your doctors folder analogy.Yeah, the public knows nothing of this and hasn't an interest in ethics. No effect whatsoever on the public.
Me either.I still dont get how perpetrating fraud to access someone's medical files, is something the stations lawyers said would be fine
They got access to personal files?I still dont get how perpetrating fraud to access someone's medical files, is something the stations lawyers said would be fine
They got access to personal files?
I thought they were told that she was fine just tired and dehydrated.
How delicate.
Tired and dehydrated. Meh. It was already common knowledge in the media.They were givn that medical info based on fraudulent info. Yeah, it is delicate. Its personal medical info.
Nah, we should all be able to pull off whatever tricks n practical jokes we want in order to get our jollies.Does it have to be?
Ah. Sidetracking the discussion by referring to an example and not the real issue. strawmanI was referring to your doctors folder analogy.
One's medical info shouldn't be available or made available to anyone other than the doc's or the patient's regardless of the conten of the medical info.Tired and dehydrated. Meh. It was already common knowledge in the media.
I can think of bigger worries in life.
Sounds a lot like first world problems to me.