Actually, as I keep telling people, Harper did not appoint Senators until the Liberals began using their majority in the Senate to thwart the will of the elected House. Then Harper had no choice....it was let the Liberal Senate run the country against the will of the House, or appoint Conservative Senators. He did what was necessary.
The Senate is something we'd like to change...........really change, not "pretend" change.
And appointing Senators through some kind of elitist vetting program is not an improvement.
I have to call BS here, sorry.
When the
Liberal Party of Canada held a majority in the Senate,
it only delayed legislation. If the House of Commons insisted upon a bill or amendments to it, then the Senate ultimately, every time, allowed the legislation to continue on through the process. It was only after the
Conservative Party of Canada gained a majority in the Senate that the Upper House
defeated the Climate Change Accountability Act and decided to "thwart the will of the elected House."
Stephen Harper "let the
Conservative Senate run the country against the will of the House."