It's time to Grade Trudeau

[MHz]

F. for Failure

Psychopaths don't get a vote as it is the same answer no matter whose name is there. (except another psychopath and then all is good)

 

[MHz]

Is that why you're here.. We need a lefty for the circle jerk?

Unnatural sex or killing innocents, not too many sides to you is there creep?

 

[White_Unifier]

He is losing his pretty hair though .

But he wears nice suits.

 

[MHz]

Is it wise to let out the only standard you actually care about. People will take advantage now that 'we' know stylish clothes are the key to your 'soul'.

 

[Twin_Moose]

Corbella: Krause questions why Trudeau changed charity laws for activists

Why did Prime Minister Justin Trudeau order his revenue minister to stop the Canada Revenue Agency from auditing politically active charities? Was it to protect his best friend and former principal secretary, Gerald Butts?
Those are just two of the many questions asked by Vivian Krause during a sold out Calgary Chamber of Commerce luncheon Wednesday at the Fairmont Palliser Hotel and during a scrum with reporters afterwards.
Krause, the Vancouver-based researcher who has single-handedly exposed the foreign-funded campaign to “land-lock Alberta crude” — which Alberta Premier Jason Kenney vows to hold a public inquiry into — pointed out that her popular blog and Twitter account are called Fair Questions, because she doesn’t claim to have all of the answers.
Toward the end of her more than one-hour discussion — complete with numerous slides showing the paper trail behind $600 million of American money from U.S. foundations to Canadian environmental groups to “demarket” Canadian oil and gas — Krause turned her attention to how questions surrounding CRA audits of political charities in Canada “go right to the office of our prime minister.”
“When the current government came to office, the prime minister characterized these audits as ‘political harassment’ in his mandate letter to the national revenue minister, and the finalization of the political activity audits was suspended (by the CRA),” she told the attentive crowd of 170 chamber members and their guests.
Krause testified before the House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance about changes made by the Trudeau government to the income tax act with regard to charities.
The main changes to the legislation are the removal of restrictions on the extent to which charities are allowed to engage in political activity — something that was not historically allowed except by registered political parties.
Suspiciously, seven days after she testified, the CRA eliminated the online access to more than one million tax returns, says Krause.
“Every single tax return for every single registered charity for 14 years. All that historical data, gone,” she said, saying that only the five most recent years remain online.
A spokesperson for the CRA, reached past business hours in Ottawa on Wednesday, was unable to find out why those documents were removed from public view but is attempting to obtain that information.
“This fall we’ve got an election coming up and a lot of this goes right to the prime minister’s office,” said Krause. “The fact that he suspended all the political activity audits for four years, then changed the law retroactively and then finalized the audits, I think it’s something we need to talk about but it’s going to be very difficult unless those tax returns are restored.”
Krause called on chambers of commerce groups across the country to write letters to the CRA and to politicians to put the data back online.
“In practice, what this means is that some of the charities that would have had their status revoked will be off the hook because the law was changed retroactively,” she told the Commons committee.
Krause said one of the findings the CRA reported was “‘serious noncompliance’ unrelated to political activity, including an ‘undue benefit’ .
“This was what I was concerned about with regard to a payment of roughly $400,000 to the president of an environmental charity. Subsequently, the individual who received this payment, Mr. Gerald Butts, became the principal secretary to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Mr. Butts has confirmed via Twitter that he did receive this payment as severance (from the World Wildlife Fund) after he voluntarily resigned (to run Trudeau’s successful 2015 federal election campaign.)
“From the way these audits were handled, some charities and individuals may have benefited. Some of these charities and individuals have very close involvement with the Office of the Prime Minister and his former principal secretary. Therefore, I believe the handling of these audits raises serious questions that merit answers,” she told the committee.
Krause also points out that the same U.S. foundations that have spent hundreds of millions of dollars successfully blocking Canadian energy pipelines to tidewater also funded groups that helped Trudeau win the 2015 election.
Krause showed slides that prove that foreign money “moved the needle” in the 2015 federal election campaign, with groups claiming credit for defeating 26 Conservative incumbents. These foreign funded groups, such as OPEN and Leadnow, pumped millions of dollars into Canada’s federal election, a dangerous loophole in Canadian law that the Trudeau government refuses — perhaps not surprisingly — to close. Leadnow admitted that it received foreign funding before the 2015 election but claims that money was not used in its Vote Together campaign to defeat the Harper Conservative government.
“They didn’t do this because of how we treat refugees or immigrants, or First Nations people or anyone else,” Krause told the crowd.
“This was done as part of the campaign to land-lock our crude. To defeat the one political party (the Conservatives) that was committed to breaking the American monopoly that’s keeping our country over a barrel,” she said.
Krause then showed a slide with a massive tangle of red lines representing pipelines and dots representing tankers on our coasts, which wasn’t lost on the oil-friendly group to reflect on the recent passing of Bill C-48, the tanker ban, and Bill C-69, which has been dubbed the “no more pipelines” law.
“The only ones against which there is a multimillion-dollar, decade-long campaign are the pipelines that would take your oil to overseas markets. No campaign against Texas,” she states.
“Why us?” she asks. “Why not Texas?”
Fair questions. We need some answers. Perhaps Butts can help.

 

[Danbones]

Venezuela, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, or Libya being the results of the other oil business landlock containment model.

 

[Durry]

F is my rating

 

[Durry]

But he wears nice suits.

Have you noticed his socks?

 

[Hoid]

Loonie Soars as the Canadian Economy Firms While U.S. Wobbles

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-the-canadian-economy-firms-while-u-s-wobbles

I guess you have to give the Liberals an A+ on the economy

 

[Danbones]

1 CAD = 0.766316 USD
1 USD = 1.30494 CAD
https://www.xe.com/currencyconverter/convert/?From=USD&To=CAD

I guess soaring would be something one does with a crack pipe in one hand.

...and NO! I will not give then "A" crack pipe. Damned Crackerbarrels.

Canadian manufacturing activity contracted for the third consecutive month in June, as a measure of production fell to a 3-1/2-year low, data showed.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/inv...es-mondays-decline-as-greenback-rally-stalls/

YOU LIEBARRELS; Gee, a 3-1/2-year low! An EFFE YOU get.

 

[Mowich]

Trudeau should try walking the walk on climate change

You have the dullards at home and abroad resisting the need for action. There are the petty critics leveling accusations of hypocrisy at those bold enough to take action on things like single-use plastics. And then there’s the tinfoil brigade who thinks carbon dioxide is simply wonderful stuff and the Earth can’t have enough of it. No, it’s not easy being green.

Say a prayer, then, for Justin “Carbon Tax” Trudeau who just winged his way to Japan on his 35-year old plane (GHG emissions = ?) for the G-20 Summit, where the debate on climate change won’t last as long as a fart in a hurricane, such is the geopolitical distemper of our times.

How weak will the climate change program be in the land of the Kyoto Accord? Well, the Americans have apparently already pressured the Japanese into downgrading the G-20’s previously agreed climate change language on the Paris Accord in the Summit communiqué.

Sorry climate emergency, the G-20 will instead be about Donald Trump and Xi Jingping, as the world waits to see whether a showdown can be averted between the United States and China. Will a trade truce be struck? Will the tariff walls come down? Will Huawei be allowed to resume its rapid creep across the West’s critical telecommunications infrastructure? Will Huawei’s Meng Wangzhou be bartered as part of a deal?

One thing we do know is Trump is coming into the meeting on blazing form. He’s already dumped on host (and frequent golfing buddy) Shinzo Abe, accusing him of being willing to sit back and watch a World War III between the U.S. and China on a Sony TV.

He’s also been tetchy about people asking about his bilateral meeting with his Russian handler. And he’s gone and accused former Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller of committing crimes ahead of Muller’s appearance before Congress.

No, even Mother Nature couldn’t push climate up the agenda under these circumstances. But given climate change is so central to the Trudeau brand and its prospects for re-election, what could Trudeau do to put it front and centre at home and abroad?

For one, he could start by staying at home at bit more often.

Air travel is a huge contributor to carbon emissions and much of international summitry is useless. Why go be a carbon-emitting fly on the wall in the Trump-Xi show, i.e. where Canada’s views aren’t solicited or listened to when given? Sure, it would be wonderful if Trudeau could buttonhole Xi on the margins of the G-20 to demand the release of our two abducted Canadians, but given the Chinese won’t even take our phone calls right now the chances of such a meeting are slim.

Instead of being ignored, why not announce that until further notice Canada will be dialling into future Summit sessions? Sure, it will drive the Global Affairs bureaucracy nuts, but it would send a message and be talked about. The Greenies would love it. And, sure, if another global economic depression arrives you go and meet face-to-face, but has a G-20 meeting truly mattered since about 2011 or so?

The same flight discipline should be applied at home, too. Instead of running a contest to ride the Liberal campaign plane around the country, as the Liberals are now doing, or taking the Challenger to Florida on holiday twice in one week, Trudeau should announce that, going forward, he will be restricting his travel and doing his announcements via video conference. Imagine how a campaign full of digital rallies, or a good old-fashioned (and less carbon intensive) train ride across Canada, would look and feel?

Mixing the Luddite with the high tech would start a different green conversation to the merits of carbon taxation and help counter any allegations of hypocrisy. It would finally put Trudeau’s money where his mouth has been for the past four years.

Because one of Trudeau’s main weaknesses is absolutely that he is a “do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do” politician. He railed against rich people getting child benefits throughout the 2015 campaign and then put two nannies on the 24 Sussex payroll the day after he won. He said the woman must always be believed on sexual harassment and kicked members out of his caucus for abuse, but then threw away the standard when a credible allegation was made against him. And he banned single-use plastics only to use them a few days later at a constituency meeting.

Yes, the flak for the single-use gaffe was overdone, but it does illustrate the difficulty in changing embedded behaviour. That is the climate change conundrum in a nutshell: everybody wants to do something as long as they don’t have to do much of anything.

Seeing a leader like Trudeau walking the walk—truly walking the walk—by restricting his enormous footprint and doing things differently would be a welcome bit of principle on climate change. Because as it stands, the Liberals’ position is that their plan would do a better job at not meeting Canada’s targets than the Tory plan.

Being a climate champion is hard work because it involves upending an entire way of life. If the Prime Minister of Canada is willing to do it, it makes it harder for others to say they won’t do their bit.

https://www.macleans.ca/opinion/trudeau-should-try-walking-the-walk-on-climate-change/

​

 

[pgs]

Trudeau should try walking the walk on climate change

You have the dullards at home and abroad resisting the need for action. There are the petty critics leveling accusations of hypocrisy at those bold enough to take action on things like single-use plastics. And then there’s the tinfoil brigade who thinks carbon dioxide is simply wonderful stuff and the Earth can’t have enough of it. No, it’s not easy being green.

Say a prayer, then, for Justin “Carbon Tax” Trudeau who just winged his way to Japan on his 35-year old plane (GHG emissions = ?) for the G-20 Summit, where the debate on climate change won’t last as long as a fart in a hurricane, such is the geopolitical distemper of our times.

How weak will the climate change program be in the land of the Kyoto Accord? Well, the Americans have apparently already pressured the Japanese into downgrading the G-20’s previously agreed climate change language on the Paris Accord in the Summit communiqué.

Sorry climate emergency, the G-20 will instead be about Donald Trump and Xi Jingping, as the world waits to see whether a showdown can be averted between the United States and China. Will a trade truce be struck? Will the tariff walls come down? Will Huawei be allowed to resume its rapid creep across the West’s critical telecommunications infrastructure? Will Huawei’s Meng Wangzhou be bartered as part of a deal?

One thing we do know is Trump is coming into the meeting on blazing form. He’s already dumped on host (and frequent golfing buddy) Shinzo Abe, accusing him of being willing to sit back and watch a World War III between the U.S. and China on a Sony TV.

He’s also been tetchy about people asking about his bilateral meeting with his Russian handler. And he’s gone and accused former Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller of committing crimes ahead of Muller’s appearance before Congress.

No, even Mother Nature couldn’t push climate up the agenda under these circumstances. But given climate change is so central to the Trudeau brand and its prospects for re-election, what could Trudeau do to put it front and centre at home and abroad?

For one, he could start by staying at home at bit more often.

Air travel is a huge contributor to carbon emissions and much of international summitry is useless. Why go be a carbon-emitting fly on the wall in the Trump-Xi show, i.e. where Canada’s views aren’t solicited or listened to when given? Sure, it would be wonderful if Trudeau could buttonhole Xi on the margins of the G-20 to demand the release of our two abducted Canadians, but given the Chinese won’t even take our phone calls right now the chances of such a meeting are slim.

Instead of being ignored, why not announce that until further notice Canada will be dialling into future Summit sessions? Sure, it will drive the Global Affairs bureaucracy nuts, but it would send a message and be talked about. The Greenies would love it. And, sure, if another global economic depression arrives you go and meet face-to-face, but has a G-20 meeting truly mattered since about 2011 or so?

The same flight discipline should be applied at home, too. Instead of running a contest to ride the Liberal campaign plane around the country, as the Liberals are now doing, or taking the Challenger to Florida on holiday twice in one week, Trudeau should announce that, going forward, he will be restricting his travel and doing his announcements via video conference. Imagine how a campaign full of digital rallies, or a good old-fashioned (and less carbon intensive) train ride across Canada, would look and feel?

Mixing the Luddite with the high tech would start a different green conversation to the merits of carbon taxation and help counter any allegations of hypocrisy. It would finally put Trudeau’s money where his mouth has been for the past four years.

Because one of Trudeau’s main weaknesses is absolutely that he is a “do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do” politician. He railed against rich people getting child benefits throughout the 2015 campaign and then put two nannies on the 24 Sussex payroll the day after he won. He said the woman must always be believed on sexual harassment and kicked members out of his caucus for abuse, but then threw away the standard when a credible allegation was made against him. And he banned single-use plastics only to use them a few days later at a constituency meeting.

Yes, the flak for the single-use gaffe was overdone, but it does illustrate the difficulty in changing embedded behaviour. That is the climate change conundrum in a nutshell: everybody wants to do something as long as they don’t have to do much of anything.

Seeing a leader like Trudeau walking the walk—truly walking the walk—by restricting his enormous footprint and doing things differently would be a welcome bit of principle on climate change. Because as it stands, the Liberals’ position is that their plan would do a better job at not meeting Canada’s targets than the Tory plan.

Being a climate champion is hard work because it involves upending an entire way of life. If the Prime Minister of Canada is willing to do it, it makes it harder for others to say they won’t do their bit.

https://www.macleans.ca/opinion/trudeau-should-try-walking-the-walk-on-climate-change/

​

But if the Prime Minister won’t do his bit , why should I ?

 

[Jinentonix]

It's not just Groper though. I've noticed that those with money who scream the loudest about the climate are the worst offenders when it comes to emissions and other aspects of their "carbon footprint".

But here's the thing the AGW crowd doesn't get. Zero emissions is a total impossibility until we figure out zero point power generation. And even then we'll still need fossil fuels and other carbon-based resources for all the shit we like to have.

 

[Danbones]

Inheritance does not necessarily equate to intelligence or actual scientific acumen.

 

[Danbones]

We could always be using a system based on Hydrogen peroxide, but noe, that would be feasible, affordable, easy to modify existing items for, would produce only pure air elements and water for pollution, and would make perfect sense.

 

[Curious Cdn]

We could always be using a system based on Hydrogen peroxide, but noe, that would be feasible, affordable, easy to modify existing items for, would produce only pure air elements and water for pollution, and would make perfect sense.

Meet HMS Explorer, a.k.a. HMS Exploder ... the Royal Navy's experimental Hydrogen Peroxide powered submarine in which the crew had neither hair nor eyebrows, the stuff is so unstable ....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Explorer_(submarine)

 

[Decapoda]

Here's how Justin Trudeau promised change and didn't deliver

Budget not balanced

Electoral reform reneged

Indigenous reform still rocky

Scandals overshadowed


Disregarding the many failures this CTV article missed....just taking into consideration the points in article alone, he deserves a...

--FAIL--

 

[Hoid]

But if the Prime Minister won’t do his bit , why should I ?

Why should you actively oppose it?

If you want to pose a real question.

 

[Danbones]

Meet HMS Explorer, a.k.a. HMS Exploder ... the Royal Navy's experimental Hydrogen Peroxide powered submarine in which the crew had neither hair nor eyebrows, the stuff is so unstable ....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Explorer_(submarine)

So what are you saying...?


You drink g ass all the time and it's perfectly safe....like the weed killer is?
(LOL!)
Have a nice shot of chlorine gas, it's safe and stable like horse poop stink too.

say...

Who knew?

Madeleine Albright says 500,000 dead Iraqi Children was "worth it" wins Medal of Freedom


ttj1776
Published on May 2, 2012
Madeleine Albright says 500,000 dead Iraqi Children was "worth it".....wins Presidential Medal of Freedom from Obama

As the anniversary of probably one of the most infamous responses in broadcasting history approaches, the woman who uttered it is shortly to be awarded "the highest honour" that America bestows upon civilians — the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Madeleine Albright, Iraq's Grim Reaper, of course, confirmed on Sixty Minutes (May 12, 1996) that the deaths of half a million children as a result of the absolute, all-embracing deprivations of the UN embargo were: "A hard choice, but the price, we think the price is worth it."

One cynical blogger, was so incensed that the header read: "Genocidal war criminal wins Presidential Medal whilst invoking Holocaust memories."

Yep...GAS and isr oil is perfectly safe for everyone young and old.

 

[MHz]

"A hard choice, but the price, we think the price is worth it."
What makes you think 'we' was a reference to America and not 'the Jewish people that are in control as that is who she takes her orders from.


What makes you think the decade of sanctions was the only time those methods have been used in the past. Cuba, Iran after 1979 (the year she also became a nuclear threat) or even Russia after the 1990 fall.


Economic sanctions would include bad medicine as well as no usefull. The 1918 flu is an example of how many they are willing to kill via 'medicine'. The total possible deaths would have to include the Black Death and the 200M it may have and even the death in Venezuela this year should be included to qualify just how little they care about 500,000 rag-tag children.
DU munitions used to be in the news a lot back then as some villages were dusted with that material and the birth defects were 'monitored' with no relief offered. That all stopped as soon a Japan blew up 4 reactors in a week, they now have a whole island that can be studied because that radiation is 'good for people'. A low dose that keeps on giving for a few 100 years will get them 'changes' that aren't the overdose that went on in Iraq.

A vid on South Africa admits diseases were used as the first shot in a war mean to exterminate the local as the war that followed would be 'one sided in the extreme there as well as Australia and North America rather than there were many accidental deaths. Diseases would have worked both ways and no explorers died from diseases they caught from 'the locals'.


The 'wicked witch of the world' would have been using 500M people in all when she said 500,000 was low enough to be worth it. That many probably means the sanctions were doing just what they were supposed to do. Gaza and the long term effects on a persons mental outlook has had 70 decades were they were not interrupted by having to kill all the witnesses. I'm going to go out on a limb and saw she had already stopped caring about the numbers long before she was ever in the position she reached when she laid the law down for all 'lesser races'. The stench includes the lie about recently finding out she was Jewish. Jerod may have clued her in.

https://time.com/4649987/madeleine-albright-donald-trump-muslim/

Madeleine Albright Says She's 'Ready to Register as Muslim' to Protest President Trump

Albright called attention to her own diverse background in a post on Twitter, noting that she was “raised Catholic, became Episcopalian & found out later my family was Jewish.”