It's Climate Change I tell'ya!! IT'S CLIMATE CHANGE!!

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
28,980
10,947
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Maybe they can collect the smoke from the fire in Washington just across the border from Osoyos.
Some kind of big shop vac or something? Then run it through a DPF filter (stock up on DEF), and have that fail chronically and consistently, expensively, with problematic sensors, etc…
We would like to know if our governments have any plans to mitigate wildfires as well. Most especially, the ones set by climate change truthers.
🤫. It’s job creation until the wind changes direction unexpectedly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

Taxslave2

Senate Member
Aug 13, 2022
5,010
2,828
113
Some kind of big shop vac or something? Then run it through a DPF filter (stock up on DEF), and have that fail chronically and consistently, expensively, with problematic sensors, etc…

🤫. It’s job creation until the wind changes direction unexpectedly.
Tough to get a job firefighting in BC. Have to take the course first.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,769
3,544
113
Burning of fossil fuels caused 1,500 deaths in recent European heat wave, study estimates
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Seth Borenstein
Published Jul 09, 2025 • 4 minute read

WASHINGTON — Human-caused climate change is responsible for killing about 1,500 people in last week’s European heat wave, a first-of-its-kind rapid study found.


Those 1,500 people “have only died because of climate change, so they would not have died if it would not have been for our burning of oil, coal and gas in the last century,” said study co-author Friederike Otto, a climate scientist at Imperial College in London.


Scientists at Imperial and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine used peer-reviewed techniques to calculate that about 2,300 people in 12 cities likely died from the heat in last week’s bout of high temperatures, with nearly two-thirds of them dying because of the extra degrees that climate change added to the natural summer warmth.

Past rapid attribution studies have not gone beyond evaluating climate change’s role in meteorological effects such as extra heat, flooding or drought. This study goes a step further in directly connecting coal, oil and natural gas use to people dying.


“Heat waves are silent killers and their health impact is very hard to measure,″ said co-author Gary Konstantinoudis, a biostatistician at Imperial College. “People do not understand the actual mortality toll of heat waves and this is because (doctors, hospitals and governments) do not report heat as an underlying cause of death” and instead attribute it to heart or lung or other organ problems.

Of the 1,500 deaths attributed to climate change, the study found more than 1,100 were people 75 or older.

Climate change made a heat wave hotter

“It’s summer, so it’s sometimes hot,” study lead author Ben Clarke of Imperial College said in a Tuesday news conference. “The influence of climate change has pushed it up by several degrees and what that does is it brings certain groups of people more into dangerous territory and that’s what’s important. That’s what we really want to highlight here. For some people it’s still warm fine weather but for now a huge sector of the population it’s more dangerous.”


Researchers looked at June 23 to July 2 in London; Paris; Frankfurt, Germany; Budapest, Hungary; Zagreb, Croatia; Athens, Greece; Barcelona, Spain; Madrid; Lisbon, Portugal; Rome; Milan and Sassari, Italy. They found that except in Lisbon, the extra warmth from greenhouse gases added 2 to 4 degrees Celsius (3.6 to 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit) to what would have been a more natural heat wave. London got the most at nearly 4 degrees (7.2 degrees Fahrenheit). Climate change only added about a degree to Lisbon’s peak temperature, the study calculated, mostly because of the Atlantic Ocean’s moderating effect, Otto said.

That extra climate-change-caused heat added the most extra deaths in Milan, Barcelona and Paris and the least in Sassari, Frankfort and Lisbon, the study found. The 1,500 figure is the middle of the range of overall climate-related death estimates that go from about 1,250 to around 1,700.


How scientists weigh climate change, calculate deaths
Wednesday’s study is not yet peer-reviewed. It is an extension of work done by an international team of scientists who do rapid attribution studies to search for global warming’s fingerprints in the growing number of extreme weather events worldwide, and combine that with long-established epidemiological research that examines death trends that differ from what’s considered normal.

Researchers compared what the thermometers read last week to what computer simulations say would have happened in a world without planet-warming greenhouse gases from fossil fuel use. Health researchers then compared estimates — there are no solid figures yet _ for heat deaths in what just happened to what heat deaths would be expected for each city without those extra degrees of warmth.


There are long-established formulas that calculate excess deaths differing from normal based on location, demographics, temperatures and other factors and those are used, Otto and Konstantinoudis said. And health researchers take into account many variables like smoking and chronic diseases, so it’s comparing similar people except for temperature so they know that’s what’s to blame, Konstantinoudis said.



Studies in 2021 generally linked excess heat deaths to human-caused climate change and carbon emissions, but not specific events like last week’s hot spell. A 2023 study in Nature Medicine estimated that since 2015, for every degree Celsius the temperature rises in Europe, there’s an extra 18,547 summer heat deaths.


Studies like Wednesday’s are “ending the guessing game on the health harms from continued burning of fossil fuels,” said Dr. Jonathan Patz, director of the Center for Health, Energy and Environmental Research at the University of Wisconsin. He was not part of the research but said it “combined the most up-to-date climate and health methods and found that every fraction of a degree of warming matters regarding extreme heat waves.”

Dr. Courtney Howard, a Canadian emergency room physician and chair of the Global Climate and Health Alliance, said, “Studies like this help us see that reducing fossil fuel use is health care.”
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Taxslave2

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,183
14,241
113
Low Earth Orbit
Ya fuck around with gasoline, YOU'LL be atomized pretty damn quick.
Dude...not a get a reaction... but I make my own potassium perchlorate for shits and giggles and buy ammonium nitrate by the tonne. Gasoline is for crackheads and debutantes. Maybe awesome for mowing up a lawn, not so much for blowing up a lawn.
It’s amazing how much stuff is flammable when it’s atomized with enough oxygen in it, from most dusts to flour.
See above. Enough farts into a fridge will blow the door off when the fan cuts in.

If your going to spend $15K and 32 months learning chemistry, it'd be a shame not to apply the knowledge even if it's for hobby purposes. Nothing nefariousish. Close but no sitar.
 
Last edited:

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,183
14,241
113
Low Earth Orbit
Basically anything that's flammable at all, if ya get it so it all burns at once (which atomizing will do). A pretty fair definition for "explosion" is "a really, really FAST fire."
Fire is just a by-product of the heat created by an exotermic chemical reaction . It's the reactive capacity of the fuel (the less carbon the better) and the rate of the reaction that creates a huge release of gasses/plasma at hypersonic speeds at a pressure higher than atmospheric pressure (over pressure) inducing a high pressure shockwave followed by a sonic boom to be an explosion. It's all about gas.

There are mechanical explosions as well without an exothermic reaction.

Thanks for dropping by.
 
Last edited:

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,141
9,424
113
Washington DC
Fire is just a by-product of the heat created by an exotermic chemical reaction . It's the reactive capacity of the fuel (the less carbon the better) and the rate of the reaction that creates a huge release of gasses/plasma at hypersonic speeds at a pressure higher than atmospheric pressure (over pressure) inducing a high pressure shockwave followed by a sonic boom to be an explosion. It's all about gas.

There are mechanical explosions as well without an exothermic reaction.

Thanks for dropping by.
There are nuclear explosions that are not "chemical reactions" nor "mechanical explosions."

Thanks for dropping by.
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,279
3,988
113
Edmonton
Jesus, can’t Trump just threaten Mount Rainier with tariffs or something? Guilbeault threaten it with carbon taxes or whatever? Anyway, in a Tuesday letter to Ambassador to the U.S. Kirsten Hillman, representatives Tom Tiffany, Brad Finstad, Tom Emmer, Michelle Fischbach, Glenn Grothman and Pete Stauber of Wisconsin and Minnesota said their constituents are coping with suffocating smoke from Canadian wildfires.

"As we are entering the height of the fire season, we would like to know how your government plans on mitigating wildfires and the smoke that makes its way south," the letter said.

The lawmakers said successive years of wildfires in Canada have undermined air quality in their states and robbed Americans of their ability to enjoy the summer.

(They pointed to forest management and arson as possible factors behind the fires. They did not mention climate change)

The lawmakers urged Hillman to relay their concerns to Ottawa, in particular to Natural Resources Canada and the Canadian Forest Service.

The Canadian Embassy in Washington confirmed it had received the letter and said it will be shared with the relevant agencies. Spokesperson Tarryn Elliott said in an email that "Canada takes the prevention, response and mitigation of wildfires very seriously, etc…”
Magic?