I know, Zzarkov, I've heard that advice before. It is very difficult to truly believe anything one finds in print. There is a saying in German: "Papier ist geduldig." Meaning, paper is tolerant.
To a degree its tolerant, but the truth comes out when the paper is out of one groups reach so to speak.
If this info on Jew Watch is false, couldn't they be charged for slander? The Jews are otherwise so alert and go after anybody who says something about them that, in their opinion, isn't true. How can they let this slide?
Well for starters, its slander on dead people. You can't sue someone (a civil case) for a wrong that doesn't involve you.
And even if you did, the laws don't cross country to country, what county is the site hosted in? Who do you deliver papers to? What do the laws in that country say? If its Iran it might say that anything anti-jewish is fine. The internet is world wide.
Encyclopedias and wikipedias have to conform to the official Jewish version of events. One does not find the truth there either. It's too one-sided.
No, they don't. There is no "Jewish Version" of events, there is no massive Jewish conspiracy. There is just historical documented fact. Its "one sided" because there is one side thats correct. Likewise if you went reading to see if the sky was blue or polka dot, it would be pretty "one sided" that people agree the sky is blue. That doesn't mean it isn't somehow true. The Jewish faith is not as all powerful as people make it out to be, they are a tiny portion of the population. Its no different than Claiming the masons run everything or the Arabs run everything.
What is called "Revisionist" stuff is totally denied, no matter how well documented. I find it hard to believe historians will rather go to jail than retracting their findings as lies, or made up for the fun of it.
Germany is a different can of worms when it comes to their laws. But yes, alot of people will go to jail for what they believe is true. But believing something is true and it being true are different. Most of the "holocaust denial" documentation has shown to be false, repeatedly. But I welcome any scholarly work into the subject, as do most people, because its simply not possible to refute it when hundreds of thousands of people saw it with their own eyes.
The danger is that as time goes by, that will be glossed over, much in the same way people gloss over the Tyranny of Genghis Khan or the Aztecs.
If the Jews have to resort to this scare tactic to silence people, then, I think, they have something to hide.
What, in your opinion, is the reason for this almost world-wide law on silence?
1, there is no world wide law on silence. There is Germany, and perhaps Austria though I am not sure. The Germans use this "Scare tactic" because too many German people were trying to simply cover up what happened for the sake of national pride, pretend it didn't happen like a housewife who finds out her new husband is molesting her child. Pretend nothing is happening and lie.
The opposition to holocaust denial comes strongest not from Jewish citizens, but the Christian and Atheist veterans (And their relatives) who saw first hand and refuse to let this sink quietly away.
2, there is no "The Jews". Seriously. There is no "Jew International" or "Elders of Zion" or any other group of Jews. They aren't even like Catholics and do not have a pope. They are individuals, thats it.
Poland, apparently, is now also threatening to persecute people who say something unflattering about their State.
When will Germany follow suit?;-)
Germany already tried to go through with that, thats why the current laws in Germany on denying the holocaust are in place. Otherwise back in the late 40's people would have swept the issue under the rug.