Just noting that all the gung-ho hard men seemed to be missing when it was their turn.
You know, chickenhawks.
Islam has started a world war conflict
- Thread starter Angstrom
- Start date
Just noting that all the gung-ho hard men seemed to be missing when it was their turn.
You know, chickenhawks.
I too have been reading the few articles available on the net about no go zones in Europe and agree that many countries are facing some pretty severe problems regarding the refugee/migrant crisis. But when you write - "If police can't enforce our countries laws in a zone, we no longer have control over this land. It is occupied" - you lose me. I have yet to hear of one no go zone in Canada.
Oh really? Let's see "Islam has started a world war conflict." I didn't realize that Europe was the entire world. You really are a sad little man.
When you have a good argument, I'll be happy to discuss, until then....
Looks like you don't have enough brain capacity to read and comprehend past the title. Not that I'm surprised. But I appreciate the time your spending here to prove how stupid you are. It's not like anything you say can be taken seriously, sinse we can all tell you don't understand the simplest of things.
Go back to the children part of the forum. This takes a little more then two brain cells to understand.
Sure, But that's not even a argument. It's hard to believe you have more then two functioning brain cells, because it's not relevant to the subject. Keep trying. A dead clock is right twice a day.
Yes thankfully, I care more for our European brothers then you?
You'll never learn because in your mind you already have things figured out. But if you could see your self from the eyes of others, I'm sure you'd be quite embarrassed. Stop trying to sound like an intellectual. You can't even string a collection of words together that make sense. All you can seem to do I call others retard, stupid, etc,etc. Not only that, your grammar sucks. you call ohers stupid and yet you can't even spell. You are truly pathetic.
I've argued with you enough to know there's no point. You'll stack fallacy upon falsity upon undemonstrated assertion, and nothing will change that. So taunting you for a chickenhawk is really all that's left.
Thank you for your very mediocre contribution to the forum.
Many members have argued with me and I've admited they are right. After they proved to have a better explanation for how things are then me. If your persuaded that I'm wrong, I'd still like to here why, because I'm always looking to grow as a person. If your arguments are BS, then you can't blame me for your own stupidity.
It is common for stupid people to not assum the responcibility of it. A viscous cycle. Since learning is having the ability to accept your own limits..
Here's a report from Bloomberg (not a notably left-wing publication) that does a pretty good job of demonstrating that no-go zones are a myth.
Debunking the Muslim No-Go Zone Myth - Bloomberg
I'll await your admission that no-go zones are a myth, Chickenhawk Little.
I'd like to add to the argument, that government agency, especially police are naturally reluctant to admit, There is a problem. Police services are not supposed to fail.
A police chief admiting this, is like asking to be fired.
I watched a 60 min show camera crew get hit by a car a few minutes after they arrived in a zone, And attacked not long after again. In a "no go zone".
Video: Muslim migrants punch, kick, ram journalists with car in Sweden’s “Little Mogadishu” no-go zone
A police chief admiting this, is like asking to be fired.
I watched a 60 min show camera crew get hit by a car a few minutes after they arrived in a zone, And attacked not long after again. In a "no go zone".
Video: Muslim migrants punch, kick, ram journalists with car in Sweden’s “Little Mogadishu” no-go zone
Well there was that 60 Minutes episode where the Swedish Police officer said it would be best if he not accompany the 60 Minutes film crew. It was all on film.
And of course, there could be a number of reasons "it would be best." Like perhaps the officer knew the film crew would get less cooperation from the people if they were accompanied by a police officer.
Nah. . . it must be because THE MUZZIES HAVE TAKEN OVER SWEDEN!
How many times have I heard this crap? "No-go zones" in U.S. cities (it was blacks, then Hispanics, and now Muzzies). "No-go zones" in the countryside (redskin savages out there).
The propaganda never really changes.
Most likely it was because the presence of a police officer would be provocative.... since the officer agreed that him entering the area would be very aggressive.
LMAO... whatever.
The police in that video, said just the sight of them will provoke violence. He says he won't go in. This police officer is so not aggressive, he won't even enter the zone. How less un aggressive do these police need to be?
They are so not aggressive that they have stopped policing the zone altogether.
Maybe just being a cop and being there is aggressive.
Clearly a number of the people in the area got so upset that they attacked the camera crew even without the police being present. It is all there to see T-Bones.
Now let's have one of your amusing disproportionate retorts!
Listen, I'm not the one presenting a single anecdote as proof that there are 55 (count 'em!) "no-go" zones in Sweden.
That'd be you and Jody over there.