Honestly I have to say that this is actually what they want. We're giving them the attention they want - negative or not doesn't matter - and we're giving them the fight they want.
This isn't some family dispute where it ends at suppertime. 'We're' giving them the things they need so peace will never happen. When you say that are you wanting the Mid-East to be under the same level of control that the US had over Iran from 1953-1979 because that is almost what Saudi Arabia and Bahraine are like today, if human rights for the locals of the area then those two places would need liberation before Syria who just had an election. Really Bahraine hosts a huge US Naval facility so tyhey should be aware of the stress the Government is putting on the citizens. Given just that why would any Nation not resist occupation by forces friendly to the West. The money that should go to the people goes to shareholders of international corporation and then off to their owners.
We're giving them the proof that the West is out to take over/control the ME instead of leaving it to itself to find its own way.
The 'West' has been after full control of that whole area for 100's of years. They want about the same thing that happened to the North American Indians to happen to the locals there. So far that goal has eluded them and when the West can't control something they make sure it makes progress with as much dificulty as possible.
I think if left to themselves sure ISIS would likely control a large area but other people in the region would have to step up and do something about it eventually, but they won't because of conflicts of religion.
That wouldn't work with ISIS because they take their orders from the West. The path is the same one Afghanistan was taking in the 1970's when the university students starting fighting against the Overlords and they almost had it won. By won that means the UN Human rights docruments and their recomendations were being willinging implemented by the local, . . . until the Werst saw am opportunity to wage war against the USSR. The 'published story' and the facts are miles apart on that. We are the biggest obsticle to peace in the area but you better look at why events over there are more important than events at home.
So to help 'stabilize' the region, "we" have to step in.
Stepping in means signing onto UN 181 and making sure the ones trampelled on by that never get it to court becaus they would win in a trial that lasted about 30 minutes.
Except we're the Great Satan and want all Muslims wiped off the planet.
You wish, Satan doesn't have to act in the shadows to change things in the light. Satan's bank account rises in value each second, the US and all other nations are going deeper into debt. With you not even knowing who the biggest enenmy is (next to death as that will always be #1) they are assured a long and fruitful life.
I really wish somebody would explain why there is $100T sitting in storage when it should be circulating throughout the globe in a perpetual flow. With the world trying to keep most working there should be a huge party going on, as it is 1% see the world that way. They don't need Satan, people are naturally a bit stupid and docile when it comes to taking mneedless abuse. The US takes from people to give to corporations, same as the founding fathers did. The instruction on how to avoid that were written down for a reason, the instructions were not followed and this is the result. Perhaps a look back at the beginning would show a pattern that is taking place in Syria and such just in this century and Iraq 10 years earlier as that is Gulf War I. Make the stak of material as thick or thin as you like, the summation will be the same, the Us is working for somebody other than the citizens of that country, always have and always will be.
Biblically speaking America would be included in 'all the Nations on the face of the earth' part in Jeremiah 25 and as such gets the same punishment as all the other ones, if accuracy means anything, I admit it does make a spin story more difficult to make up and still have it at least appear accurate. If America was actually in charge Africa would look like the wild west with all sorts of building going on, instead it is kept as primitive as possible and it is a mirror of the North American fur trade where the locals gets some beads that are worth $1 and the traders who do no work sell them for $1,000. Today the Natives deserve 95% of that 1,000 and it can be sent back to the Nations for productsa that are more useful that decoration for art. That is called progression of society, business men got protection from the Royals with the Magna Carta nor 'thye business men' are highly reluctent to allow those same protections to protect their consumers, not because the demands are unreasonable but because it means they don't get to collect all the money at the end of each day. The world would run better if they kept 5% of the amount they have created and the 95% stays with the people that create a need for money to exist in the first place. If the fur trade numbers from above are used the business people would have made $50 and the trappers $950 of which would be given back to the Traders in exchange for the extra wagon loads of merchandise that was produced bak in their homelands rather than it all going into a deep dark cave and the Teader and the Trappers are getting the worst deal possible. It doesn't matter how good the harness is if the wheels fall off the wagon isn't going anywhere.
No, we're giving them what they want, exactly; a great scape goat to excuse what they do and shove their ideals and ideology down the throats of the region because better extremist Muslims who are at least 'brothers', than Infidels.
Wow, would you get the message they were pissed off if NA experienced as many explosions as (Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq) experience in a day? That is 'them' fight 'us', it is not 'them' fighting 'them'. When Iraq fought a war agains Iran for 8 years they were under the direction of the US because Iranian university student overthrew a brutal dictatorship, one that the US has in control because them western businesses got all the money that would belong to the people if the event happened in North America. NA fought a big war because the 'locals' didn't thing England deserved most of the money that 'came from the natural treasures of America' when their effort for input was nil.
If we allow ourselves to act like thugs it is hardly right to condem others for doing thugish acts.
