Is the Pope on crack?

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
Re: RE: Is the Pope on crack?

FiveParadox said:
Years ago, England also used to be Catholic, didn't it?

Yes.

Catholic means universal. For the most part it was "Christianity".
 

Finder

House Member
Dec 18, 2005
3,786
0
36
Toronto
www.mytimenow.net
selfactivated said:
(post 1) No it was Anglican. Its not the same but I think its close.

http://www.anglicancatholic.org/

(post 2)Im wrong your right ;)

BUT Theres a type of Protestant too.

(post 3)
FiveParadox said:
Years ago, England also used to be Catholic, didn't it?


http://www.victorianweb.org/philosophy/philtl.html



This might help too.


editted so the 3 posts didnt come off as trolling.


Tes England used to be Catholic until a famous King who loved to behead his wives wanted a divorce between him and yet another wife. The Pope said no and thus the king divorce england from Rome.

a source: http://www.britannia.com/history/monarchs/mon41.html
 

dekhqonbacha

Electoral Member
Apr 30, 2006
985
1
18
CsL, Mtl, Qc, Ca, NA, Er, SS,MW, Un
quinton said:
Pope benedict thinks slowed population growth is bad.

http://www.cbc.ca/cp/world/060520/w052050.html

Is this guy crazy?

He is talking as though Canada's low birth rate is bad and is resulting from the "pervasive effects of secularism".

Doesn't he realize the earth's resources are finite and we are already losing species to extinction?

Thank "god" for secularism or things would be worse!

You interpreted the message of Pope incorrectly!



Pope benedict thinks slowed population growth is bad.

When I read this, I thought that the population of world. But, in the link it says only about Canada.

The birth rate is high where poeple are poor. Once those nations also make political and economical reforms succesfully then the birth rate of those county also fall.
 

Vereya

Council Member
Apr 20, 2006
2,003
54
48
Tula
dekhqonbacha said:
The birth rate is high where poeple are poor. Once those nations also make political and economical reforms succesfully then the birth rate of those county also fall.

I wonder why. It would make so much more sense if it was vice versa...
 

dekhqonbacha

Electoral Member
Apr 30, 2006
985
1
18
CsL, Mtl, Qc, Ca, NA, Er, SS,MW, Un
The rise in material standards of living brings sharp increases in the of population growth: the population explosion. But as material standards of living rises for above subsistence, countries begin to undergo the demographic transition.

Birth control means that those who don't wish to have more children can exercise their choice.Parents begin to find more satisfaction in having a few children and paying a great deal of attention to each.

In the world not all countiries have gone through their demographic transitions. Many countries are not rich enough to have begun the population growth declines seen in developped/industrialized countries.

Up until year 1800 human populations grew very slowly, and human living standards low. After 1800, there is a increase in living standards. And after 1800 population grew as the population explosion took hold. At first the rise in material standard of living brought sharp increases in rate of population growth: population explosion. But as material standard of living rose, countries began to undergo the demographic transition; population growth rates peaked and began to decline.



Contries with high population growth rate: above 2%
Congo
Iraq
Ethiopia
Pakistan
Tanzanie
NIgeria
Nepal
Sudan

Contries with low, below 0.5% or negative population growth rate.

Canada
France
Britian
Poland
Japan
Germany
Ukraine

with negative growth rate:
Russia
Spain
Italy
 

LittleRunningGag

Electoral Member
Jan 11, 2006
611
2
18
Calgary, Alberta
members.shaw.ca
Vereya said:
dekhqonbacha said:
The birth rate is high where poeple are poor. Once those nations also make political and economical reforms succesfully then the birth rate of those county also fall.

I wonder why. It would make so much more sense if it was vice versa...

There are many areas in the world where the average life span of children is very low, and parents need to have many children in order to ensure that some of them live.

Also, in some of these cultures they believe that men require a male child in order to get into their heaven. As a result couples have child after child until they feel safe that they will have a living male child to usher them into the afterlife.

Catholicism, and other organized religions, play a big role in their attempt to limit birth control education. The Catholic Church actively distributes propaganda of misinformation among poverty ridden nations, punishing nations that choose not to participate by reducing or eliminating aid relief. This is also one of the main reasons for the spread of AIDS in Africa.

So basically you can blame religion and a lack of education. Which is a result of which is up to you to decide.
 

dekhqonbacha

Electoral Member
Apr 30, 2006
985
1
18
CsL, Mtl, Qc, Ca, NA, Er, SS,MW, Un
What religion is that? that requires male child in orger to get into heaven?

I've never heard about it.

However, in previous post I talked about the causes for population decline, whatever is not inverse to that automatically does not slow population growth.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Re: RE: Is the Pope on crack?

quinton said:
Then, what space and resources would be left for other people let alone wildlife and biodiversity?

Presumably god will take care of everything, as long as the multi-billions of humans follow the proper rituals as laid down by the church authorities. But if enough people fail at that (a virtual certainty), then god can indulge himself in another of those Old Testament style mass murders of the unrighteous. The proximate cause, of course, will be ecological suicide caused by a plague of humans on the planet, but really, the true explanation will be that god did it as punishment for us not behaving properly. He's done it before, many times according to the Old Testament. Faith can explain anything, without regard for facts.

But to answer the OP's question simply, as Finder implicitly suggested we should (sorry Finder, but a question like that just begs for a little hyperbole in the answer): no, the Pope isn't on crack. But he might as well be for all the sense he makes. He's just a silly shallow man who's lived a fairly privileged and sheltered life and is thus a little out of touch with reality.

And another thought: I can't be the only one who's noticed that birth rates seem to be highest where the status of women is lowest.
 

LittleRunningGag

Electoral Member
Jan 11, 2006
611
2
18
Calgary, Alberta
members.shaw.ca
A quick internet search brings up Hinduism. I don't know if this is the case with all sects however, as there are quite a few different brands of Hinduism.

A son is generally preferred because he upholds the family values and ensures its continuity. A family without a male child is considered accursed. Male children are preferred for many reasons. Financially a male child is an asset. Socially he stands for the continuity and the exalted image of the family. Spiritually he helps his parents in their afterlife, by performing their funeral rites when they die and saving them from the hell of Punnama where people without sons are believed to go. Thereafter he performs the shradda ceremonies at regular intervals to ensure their well being in the heavens. The female children are excluded from participating in funeral ceremonies and are not even allowed to visit the cremation grounds. If a couple has more than one son, the elder one and the younger one would lit the funeral pyres of their father and mother respectively.

Link
 

Vereya

Council Member
Apr 20, 2006
2,003
54
48
Tula
Re: RE: Is the Pope on crack?

Dexter Sinister said:
LittleRunningGag said:
A son is generally preferred...etc.

That's sick. Stupid, sexist, and sick. Wow, there's just nothing like organized religion for generating random folly and authoritarian nonsense.

While I do agree with you about the organized religions, I don't think that preference for sons is a sexist thing. In a lot of countries everyday life is hard enough. A son would be a real help, an extra man in the household, to earn more money, or to do more work, whatever. And a daughter is just an extra mouth to feed until she gets married and leaves the family altogether. So, I don't know about heaven, but sons often make it a lot easier in this life.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Re: RE: Is the Pope on crack?

Vereya said:
...sons often make it a lot easier in this life.

But that's the essential point, isn't it? A society organized in such a way as to favour sons, with daughters being second class, just a burden on the family until they leave and become a burden on someone else, seems seriously unbalanced and misguided to me. Biology has arranged things so that about equal numbers of males and females will be conceived*, and there's a reason for that. Needless to say, if everyone had only sons, there'd be no humanity pretty soon, so favouring one gender over another like that is ultimately self-defeating.

Time for the women to rise up and kick a few of the self-satisfied butts on the guys who think they're running things there... :lol:


*actually, slightly more males are conceived and slightly more of them die young, so the numbers stay about equal in the long term, as far as reproductive numbers go. There are a lot more old ladies than old men, but that's another issue.
 

tracy

House Member
Nov 10, 2005
3,500
48
48
California
That's only because modern "family planning" methods haven't been available in some of those places until recently. Contrast that with China where in some areas it is already becoming difficult for men to find wives because they outnumber them so much.
 

Nuggler

kind and gentle
Feb 27, 2006
11,596
141
63
Backwater, Ontario.
:D Read all the previous posts, put an add in the paper offering stud service, with conception being the goal of course. So far, not one reply.

Damn it Popey, I'm a tryin. 8)

:idea:
 

Nuggler

kind and gentle
Feb 27, 2006
11,596
141
63
Backwater, Ontario.
Dexter Sinister said:
Maybe if you didn't advertise yourself as old'n'ugly...

:idea: Thanks Dex: Never woulda thoughta thet ther :lol: :lol:

:? Why didn't I....................think.........of.....................

Ah well :roll: