But who or what defines the good? I've no doubt you'd say it's god, but I don't believe in any god, and by any measure I understand I'm a good person. I've also no doubt you'd explain that as god working in me without my knowledge, but I don't believe that either. It's not necessary to invoke a deity to explain human morality and ethics, they follow quite naturally from our nature as social animals and the need to make rules about how we're going to get along with each other. Religious explanations are merely post hoc justifications of existing social conditions.
It is hard to explain without evoking the name of a diety, for around it rests all answers.
Each one of us has within a sense of goodness contrasted with the outer sense of lusts.
There is no discrimination on who it is, for all of us fall in that catagory.
If we excercised the goodness over the lusts that is without, we are good people.
Goodness is giving, lusts is taking.
Now religion is a vehicle by which understanding comes, the problem is that it can be man made religious manipulation which falls in the lusts catagory.
In your case, I judge that your a good man without the religious stigma, and by what I know and understand of God, your not alone in this world.
Much is required of me for my understanding of God, so I must be careful to lead and to guide gently, kindly and compasionately so as to represent who God realy is.
I believe that if you continue to do good to others that rewards follow.
Peace>>>AJ