Love is not sentiment
To be sentimental, to be emotional, is not love, because sentimentality and emotion are mere sensations. A religious person who weeps about mother or father, Jesus or Krishna, about his guru and somebody else is merely sentimental, emotional. He is indulging in sensation, which is a process of thought, and thought is not love.Obviously thought is the result of sensation, so the person who is sentimental, who is emotional, cannot possibly know love. I think sentimentality, emotionalism, is merely a form of self-expansion. To be full of emotion is obviously not love, because a sentimental person can be cruel when his sentiments are not responded to, when his feelings have no outlet. An emotional person can be stirred to hatred, to war, to butchery. A man who is sentimental, full of tears for his religion( I'm sure that we are familiar with some ) , surely, has no love.
To be sentimental, to be emotional, is not love, because sentimentality and emotion are mere sensations. A religious person who weeps about mother or father, Jesus or Krishna, about his guru and somebody else is merely sentimental, emotional. He is indulging in sensation, which is a process of thought, and thought is not love.Obviously thought is the result of sensation, so the person who is sentimental, who is emotional, cannot possibly know love. I think sentimentality, emotionalism, is merely a form of self-expansion. To be full of emotion is obviously not love, because a sentimental person can be cruel when his sentiments are not responded to, when his feelings have no outlet. An emotional person can be stirred to hatred, to war, to butchery. A man who is sentimental, full of tears for his religion( I'm sure that we are familiar with some ) , surely, has no love.