Is it moral for our governments to impose poverty on us?
Taxation determines what poverty levels will exist within it’sdemographic form. It controls the graph shown below. Governments controltaxation and thus control poverty levels directly.
Imagine if you will, the real truth of that taxation, ifused correctly, to move the wealth shown in this graph wherever it wants to, withminimal effect on the whole. The fact is, experts say that such a reality wouldbe a win win for everyone.
https://www.upworthy.com/9-out-of-10-americans-are-completely-wrong-about-this-mind-blowing-fact-2
Not how little of a change would be needed to reach theideal.
Wise and moral people throughout history, as well as mostreligious movements, put poverty as the number one enemy to man’s firstpriority, which is security.
For perhaps the first time in history, we have the wealthwhere we could end poverty quite easily, --- just with our collective loosechange.
It would seem to me that governments are not actingethically and should be chastised.
I guess that George Carlin, a wise person, was correct in whathe said of what Americans cannot feel in their anal orifices. I apply the samecondition to the vast majority of the world.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-14SllPPLxY
If true that we are being willfully ignorant, and do noteven care about each other to insure we live in a moral environment, then ourowners have succeeded in cowering man’s moral nature to a state of subservience.We have given up our freedom. If we ever had any.
We have all accepted to be slaves. Shame on us all.
We do not live in a Democracy. We live in a Hypocrisy.
We can easily rid ourselves of poverty.
Should we?
Morality says yes.
Will we do the right thing?
Not till hell freezes over.
Regards
DL
Taxation determines what poverty levels will exist within it’sdemographic form. It controls the graph shown below. Governments controltaxation and thus control poverty levels directly.
Imagine if you will, the real truth of that taxation, ifused correctly, to move the wealth shown in this graph wherever it wants to, withminimal effect on the whole. The fact is, experts say that such a reality wouldbe a win win for everyone.
https://www.upworthy.com/9-out-of-10-americans-are-completely-wrong-about-this-mind-blowing-fact-2
Not how little of a change would be needed to reach theideal.
Wise and moral people throughout history, as well as mostreligious movements, put poverty as the number one enemy to man’s firstpriority, which is security.
For perhaps the first time in history, we have the wealthwhere we could end poverty quite easily, --- just with our collective loosechange.
It would seem to me that governments are not actingethically and should be chastised.
I guess that George Carlin, a wise person, was correct in whathe said of what Americans cannot feel in their anal orifices. I apply the samecondition to the vast majority of the world.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-14SllPPLxY
If true that we are being willfully ignorant, and do noteven care about each other to insure we live in a moral environment, then ourowners have succeeded in cowering man’s moral nature to a state of subservience.We have given up our freedom. If we ever had any.
We have all accepted to be slaves. Shame on us all.
We do not live in a Democracy. We live in a Hypocrisy.
We can easily rid ourselves of poverty.
Should we?
Morality says yes.
Will we do the right thing?
Not till hell freezes over.
Regards
DL
