IRAN'S FASTEST UNDERWATER MISSLE

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Too bad the only kill this torpedo has is the Russian sub that carried it.

Keep dreaming DB.

It is a scam and US Carriers will sail untouched. You know it and I know it and most importantly the Iranians know it. It is tough to fire torpedos if the subs are sitting at the bottom next to their moorings.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
RE: IRAN'S FASTEST UNDERW

Since none of your contributions on this thread were correct I see no reason to give your empty boasting much credit, it's nice to have team spirit but the facts speak for themselves and the sites I looked at had US navy sources, at the time of thier posting the torpedo in question was considered a real threat by your own military and US developement of the same weapon was years behind the Russian design.
 

jimmoyer

jimmoyer
Apr 3, 2005
5,101
22
38
69
Winchester Virginia
www.contactcorp.net
I don't much care who is technically right. All I know
is you should never underestimate, and never over-react
and have the wisdom to know when to break those 2 rules.


In addition I don't care which team you cheer, or
which side you are on, this news bodes nothing but
bad for all of us if the Persian Gulf is shut down.

Some of you may jump for joy before the worldwide
depression sets in.

And then all of your care for the little guy was a joke
anyway because of your glee over this.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
RE: IRAN'S FASTEST UNDERW

I never overestimate or underestimate, and you do care about which team I cheer for, I cheer for the world, not just our part of the team, but the whole team, life for the little guys can not get much worse JimMoyer and you should know that, there must be eaqul distribution of wealth, the events unfolding will move the world along that path, to accept anything less is inhuman.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Re: RE: IRAN'S FASTEST UNDERWATER MISSLE

jimmoyer said:
I don't much care who is technically right. All I know
is you should never underestimate, and never over-react
and have the wisdom to know when to break those 2 rules.


In addition I don't care which team you cheer, or
which side you are on, this news bodes nothing but
bad for all of us if the Persian Gulf is shut down.

Some of you may jump for joy before the worldwide
depression sets in.

And then all of your care for the little guy was a joke
anyway because of your glee over this.

A two hundred mile an hour torpedo, Wow.

This topic could have generated all sorts of interesting debate but it turned instead into a pissing contest.

Who is going to shut down the Persian Gulf? Four Iranian subs with a few new torpedoes? What would be truly unfortunate is for Russia to sell nuclear warheads to go with the torpedoes.

The biggest contribution to worldwide depression was more than likely the invasion of Iraq. The American people are soon going to demand that their troops are pulled out of Iraq. The civil war that is already happening will likely spread.
 

Finder

House Member
Dec 18, 2005
3,786
0
36
Toronto
www.mytimenow.net
Re: RE: IRAN'S FASTEST UNDERWATER MISSLE

jimmoyer said:
I don't much care who is technically right. All I know
is you should never underestimate, and never over-react
and have the wisdom to know when to break those 2 rules.


In addition I don't care which team you cheer, or
which side you are on, this news bodes nothing but
bad for all of us if the Persian Gulf is shut down.

Some of you may jump for joy before the worldwide
depression sets in.

And then all of your care for the little guy was a joke
anyway because of your glee over this.


"All I know is you should never underestimate, and never over-react
and have the wisdom to know when to break those 2 rules."

Very true and that is why I say the Iranian's are would not be an easy target, as well as if they wanted to be they could pose a big threat in the region to american forces and merchant shipping.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
RE: IRAN'S FASTEST UNDERW

I hope for peaceful resolution I don't want to see anyone killed but what will it take to make the US and UK and Canada see that this stupid grab for oil is disasterous and misguided,when the wrong people are placed in positions of power warfare and death always result, for some this is just good business.
 

Finder

House Member
Dec 18, 2005
3,786
0
36
Toronto
www.mytimenow.net
Re: RE: IRAN'S FASTEST UNDERW

darkbeaver said:
I hope for peaceful resolution I don't want to see anyone killed but what will it take to make the US and UK and Canada see that this stupid grab for oil is disasterous and misguided,when the wrong people are placed in positions of power warfare and death always result, for some this is just good business.

Well the grab for oil didn't really work the first time since oil production is down and the price of occupation is so high. I do not think the USA and the UK will make the same mistake twice, xp if it's just over oil.
 

jimmoyer

jimmoyer
Apr 3, 2005
5,101
22
38
69
Winchester Virginia
www.contactcorp.net
I repeat :

I don't care which team you cheer, or
which side you are on, this news bodes nothing but
bad for all of us if the Persian Gulf is shut down.

Some of you may jump for joy before the worldwide
depression sets in.

And then all of your care for the little guy was a joke
anyway because of your glee over this.

Most world leaders know this better than the average
politically responsible citizen.
 

Finder

House Member
Dec 18, 2005
3,786
0
36
Toronto
www.mytimenow.net
Re: RE: IRAN'S FASTEST UNDERWATER MISSLE

jimmoyer said:
I repeat :

I don't care which team you cheer, or
which side you are on, this news bodes nothing but
bad for all of us if the Persian Gulf is shut down.

Some of you may jump for joy before the worldwide
depression sets in.

And then all of your care for the little guy was a joke
anyway because of your glee over this.

Most world leaders know this better than the average
politically responsible citizen.

Even Bush has stated that The USA (and really the world) needs to get off the addication to oil. Both Canada and the USA should be heavily investing in making other substitutions available sooner.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
RE: IRAN'S FASTEST UNDERW

American military supremacy has fueled arms development, since air superiority has been the problem to address in modren conflict I would expect that there are in existance very capable air defence systems, 60 years of R & D must have come up with strong anti-aircraft systems by now.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Re: RE: IRAN'S FASTEST UNDERW

darkbeaver said:
Since none of your contributions on this thread were correct I see no reason to give your empty boasting much credit, it's nice to have team spirit but the facts speak for themselves and the sites I looked at had US navy sources, at the time of thier posting the torpedo in question was considered a real threat by your own military and US developement of the same weapon was years behind the Russian design.

All of my contributions have been accurate. You just want to believe what you want. You secretly hope for one day to see an American Aircraft carrier be sunk by ANYBODY.

It isn't going to happen.

You have always been jealous and envious of the US that is why you jump with glee at Iranian propaganda.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Re: RE: IRAN'S FASTEST UNDERW

darkbeaver said:
American military supremacy has fueled arms development, since air superiority has been the problem to address in modren conflict I would expect that there are in existance very capable air defence systems, 60 years of R & D must have come up with strong anti-aircraft systems by now.

Because you want to see more US planes shot down right?
 

The Gunslinger

Electoral Member
May 12, 2005
169
0
16
Wetaskiwin, AB
The American navy is littered with so many sensor arrays that I have many suspicions about anything getting through them. Not it that it can't happen, just that it is extremely unlikely.

And what's the range of the torpedo/missile? Is it far enough that they can shoot it from a long ways away? Because anything less than 10km is spittint distance to a modern day well equipped navy.

And lastly. In the Falklands War, the Royal Navy managed to wound the ARA Sante Fe (a submarine) so bably that she was abandoned.
 

jimmoyer

jimmoyer
Apr 3, 2005
5,101
22
38
69
Winchester Virginia
www.contactcorp.net
Even Bush has stated that The USA (and really the world) needs to get off the addication to oil. Both Canada and the USA should be heavily investing in making other substitutions available sooner.
---------------------------Finder---------------------------

Finder, I totally agree.

After all the noise, after all the arguments, all the levels
that run deeper than left and right, you will find that
most of the Western World would support any leader
that leads us away from OIL DEPENDENCE.

Even in America, this deep sentiment is untapped.

The Western world is sick of its prostitution to this
God.

And we really need to fornicate those who own it.

It will be the best sex Civilization will ever record.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Re: RE: IRAN'S FASTEST UNDERWATER MISSLE

The Gunslinger said:
The American navy is littered with so many sensor arrays that I have many suspicions about anything getting through them. Not it that it can't happen, just that it is extremely unlikely.

And what's the range of the torpedo/missile? Is it far enough that they can shoot it from a long ways away? Because anything less than 10km is spittint distance to a modern day well equipped navy.

And lastly. In the Falklands War, the Royal Navy managed to wound the ARA Sante Fe (a submarine) so bably that she was abandoned.

That is what I have been trying to say and have been posting links talking about the short comings about this torpedo.

The max effective range is 7Km. Much too close for modern day sub tactics.

But some folks are so excited to think that a carrier could possibly be hit that they ignore the facts of the issue and dream.

And with any subs being a threat I know that the bottom of the Iranian coasts are covered with fixed underwater sensors that monitor the coming and going of these subs. Just as it was in the North Atlantic for the Soviets. When the Soviet subs left port the US knew it and then would send attack subs to follow them. If these subs pose a threat the US Attack Subs will shadow every move.
 

diaeagle

Diaeagle
Apr 6, 2006
158
0
16
oh oh eaglesmake you speaking as confident from that....as you see BUSH tell you about big army of iraq and iraqi people believe him before you...... but as you see your soldiers come to iraq and they hope know to go out you think you have win....... so the real issue that when you see irans power to be big and big you go dirctly and deride from it but if you think as BUSH you want realy to destroy it just to be sure there are no one can stands on the world as america .... so it easy
# iraq hasnt weighty weapon====>>>>>your soldiers destroy it...if you see
# iran will have nuclear weapon and heavy weapon=====>>> your BUSH hope to erase it from world

and but some other country as.... BUSH say that they must keep them self and they must developed their weapon.... but please know that israel have technology and weapon iran must work for hundred of years to reach them... and and america tell the world she must protect israel from iraq......>>iran......>>which after????
we must wait when america finish from iran and then we can see...
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
diaeagle said:
oh oh eaglesmake you speaking as confident from that....as you see BUSH tell you about big army of iraq and iraqi people believe him before you...... but as you see your soldiers come to iraq and they hope know to go out you think you have win....... so the real issue that when you see irans power to be big and big you go dirctly and deride from it but if you think as BUSH you want realy to destroy it just to be sure there are no one can stands on the world as america .... so it easy
# iraq hasnt weighty weapon====>>>>>your soldiers destroy it...if you see
# iran will have nuclear weapon and heavy weapon=====>>> your BUSH hope to erase it from world

and but some other country as.... BUSH say that they must keep them self and they must developed their weapon.... but please know that israel have technology and weapon iran must work for hundred of years to reach them... and and america tell the world she must protect israel from iraq......>>iran......>>which after????
we must wait when america finish from iran and then we can see...

Liberals at their finest. :lol:

Let me speak to you in a language that you may understand...

Oh you see you oh but when iran you go see... huh... but you BUSH when he go Iraq and you soldiers say HUH and say no that you can know and do know >>> now that iran has weapon and you say oh no we know that you no have weapon but isreal and BUSH know >>> how you know that we know iraq and iran and BUSH know.

Correct me if I'm wrong EagleSmack,

but it sounds very much like you are belittling a new poster because of his apparent weakness in English. How well do you speak Farsi, or Arabic?
I don't want to see any more of this trash. You will not get a second warning!


#juan......Moderator
 

nettoffee

New Member
Nov 2, 2006
28
0
1
51
Cakgary, AB
Yes the states in stronger, but the problem is the states army lost less than 4000 soldiers in Iraq in four years and they are very sad about it. The http://www.iraqbodycount.org/ web site shows that Iraq lost from 59326 to 65160 and in wars for every 10 soldiers you lose, if enemy loses 15 then this is victory. Is US ready for such victory?