Personally, I think it should be a privilege, like driving. As soon as you make it a right, then any brain dead nutjob can have firearms if he has not shown any signs of violence before. So, one of these nutjobs is relatively non-violent for a while, then purchases or steals a few thousand rounds and several weapons and sits in a bell tower plinking away at people or mowing them down in a crowded theater. But that is solvable, too, because we could arrange for people to qualify to have firearms. It's just more work than keeping firearms ownership a privilege, IMO.@ bobnoorduyn - you misunderstand me. I am not anti-gun - not even pro-gun registry - to be honest.
My point is - no where in our constitution does it say that "to bear arms" is a fundamental right. Because other countries deem it so, does not mean that we can import their standards.
If gun ownership is a basic right, then it should be codified. If not (a basic right), then they should be controlled and registered.