I politics

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
I just refreshed my memory reading Wikipedia. Very sad case, two other idiots are also serving 12-15 years as they supplied the gun.



One is now out on full parole, and they didn't get as long as wiki states.
 

personal touch

House Member
Sep 17, 2014
3,023
0
36
alberta/B.C.
Wrong, they had a warrant on the day they returned and were gunned down. They had a legal right, on that day, to do the search.

Try again, next.
misinformed,there was big problems with the warrant,as I understand the signers of the warrant did not believe the police should be there,and was hesitant to sign ANY warrant,it was also a civil matter and the cops should have not been there in the first place.


provided inside knowledge was there was game playing with the rookie cops,having a little fun with their brother in arms I guess,this was unfortunate because the cops who were killed were not suppose to be there in the first place,true or not,it was information which was passed onto me by other cops,as I understand it was the rookie cops day off,such a pity.
my interest does not lay itself with the end results but the events which lead up to the tragedy, and what interests me more is when management manipulates the information so that owness or responsibility does not direct the public to question motives.
Questions like why the gun/rifle had no finger prints,and was as reported wiped clean of finger prints, I like to dwell into these type of questions.
for all your knowledge,do you think the public and the families were purposely cheated out of correct information?
based on my information the families were played to believe truths which were not truths,
in the end designs of inquests/inquiries can be tampered with,do we want this as Canadians?