[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
How a man from Canada - a 'human rights lawyer' - has tried to stop David Icke and so many others having the right to express their freedom of speech.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Does anyone know anything that we should know about Richard Warman?[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
If so contact ... info@archipelagopr.co.uk[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Here is a documentary on David Icke and featuring Warman in 2001 (not all that is said in the reporter's commentary about David Icke is correct).[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Click here to watch ...[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
..................................................[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Richard Warman receives award from the Canadian Jewish Congress (Bronfman family) which has also campaigned to deny David Icke's freedom of speech. Just a coincidence, nothing to worry about.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Warman's modus operandi:[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
'I’ve come to the conclusion that I can be most effective by using what I like to describe as a ‘maximum disruption’ approach. … If I think that they’ve violated the Canadian Human Rights Act, then I’ll look at all of the potential targets and file complaints against them starting on a ‘worst offender’ basis, although sometimes if I just find people to be particularly annoying this may move them up the list a bit'[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Warman continues:[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
'The ‘maximum disruption’ part comes in because wherever I think it will be most helpful, or even if I just feel it will be the most fun, I strongly believe in hitting the neo-nazis on as many of these fronts as possible either at the same time or one after the other. I say this because it keeps them off-balance and forces them to respond to things that focus their energies on defending themselves …'[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Read more ...[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
.........................................................[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
On Warman pretending to be a woman named: Mary Dufford.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
'It's an account that I previously used to correspond with Mr. [Eldon] Warman. Whenever there were questions about issues surrounding the case, or if there was something that I wished to know more about his theories, then I would simply send him e-mails using this pseudonym account, posing as a supporter of his.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
I apologize for the wording of the initiating e-mail, but I have found in the past that you tend to get a better response or a more rapid response if you pose as a supporter who accepts the theories, or at least is interested in knowing more about.'[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Testimony of Richard Warman[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Read more ...[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
.......................................................... [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Yes! Canadian Human Rights Commission Exposed in Federal Court[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
'Despite an Eastern Ontario snowfall that delayed the appearance of his counsel, Barbara Kulaszka, for an hour and a half, Marc Lemire walked out of Federal Court in Toronto today a happy man. By sheer persistence, he had wrung out of the Canadian Human Rights Commissions some amazing admissions.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
At least one investigator for the Canadian Human Rights Commission has adopted a false Internet persona and trolled the Internet engaging in conversations with prospective victims. In other words, the CHRC is spying on Canadians, not observing and investigating, but participating and instigating ...' [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
... 'Ironically, this was the biggest crowd of supporters ever to attend one of the Lemire hearings and it included several victims of Richard Warman. The atmosphere was enthusiastic but peaceful. “The bogus threat of security and the drama queen scene of Mr. Warman and Commission lawyers even being accompanied to the washroom by bodyguards has been a costly and deliberate tactic to vilify the victims, to make us appear to be a threat. I’m glad that this time, both sides were allowed to approach the bench on a level playing field,” Paul Fromm commented.'[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Read more ...[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
....................................[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
'The evidence Marc Lemire is challenging before the Federal Court is explosive and will blow the whole agenda of the CHRC into the open. In a 300 page record, prepared by lead counsel Barbara Kulaszka, the abuse of Section 37 by the Commission was laid out in amazingly clear detail. Those 300 pages decimate the Canadian Human Rights Commission’s claims and expose the spying operations of Canada’s Thought Control apparatus.'[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Read more ...[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
....................................[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Senator Cools[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
'Is Richard Warman a racist bigot, or was he "just following orders" issued by his masters at the Canadian Human Rights Commission when he posted the headlined message above on a Freedomsite forum on September 5, 2003? Whatever the answer, the same CHRC that has ruled Bible verses to be hate speech doesn't seem to consider these words to be a problem. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
But they are a big problem, for both Richard Warman and the CHRC, and the rest of what he wrote only makes matters worse. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
“Not only is Canadian Senator Anne Cools a Negro, she is also an immigrant! And she is also one helluva preachy ****. She does NOT belong in my Canada. My Anglo-Germanic people were here before there was a Canada and her kind have jumped in, polluted our race, and forced their bull**** down our throats.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Time to go back to when the women nigger imports knew their place…
And that place was NOT in public!"[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
It may be mere coincidence that Richard Warman is in fact an Anglo-German, but it is not likely a coincidence at all that the owner of the website where Richard Warman posted this racist screed against Sen. Anne Cools came under attack by the CHRC shortly after Richard Warman began his complaint-less investigation there.'[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Read more ...[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
....................................[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]At last, the mainstream media is asking the obvious question ... who the hell is Richard Warman?[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Warman pulls down a David Icke talk poster[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Why should Richard Warman be the only citizen to have his own personal inquisition?[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
From Macleans Magazine[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
'Who has availed themselves of the "human rights" protected by Section XIII? In its entire history, over half of all cases have been brought by a sole "complainant," one Richard Warman. Indeed, Mr. Warman has been a plaintiff on every single Section XIII case before the federal "human rights" star chamber since 2002 — and he's won every one.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
That would suggest that no man in any free society anywhere on the planet has been so comprehensively deprived of his human rights. Well, no. Mr. Warman doesn't have to demonstrate that he's been deprived of his human rights, only that it's "likely" (i.e. "highly un-") that someone somewhere will be deprived of some right sometime. Who is Richard Warman? What's his story? Well, he's a former employee of the Canadian Human Rights Commission: an investigator. Same as Shirlene McGovern.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Isn't there something a little odd in a supposedly necessary Canadian federal "human rights" system used all but exclusively by one lone Canadian who served as a long-time employee of that system? Why should Richard Warman be the only citizen to have his own personal inquisition?'[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
A must see.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Read more ...[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Another fact: In the three decades of the Canadian 'Human Rights' Tribunal's existence, not a single 'defendant' in such cases has ever been 'acquitted'.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
....................................[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]What 'human rights' lawyer Richard Warman thinks of David Icke's right to free speech and your right to hear it[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
This is what Canadian 'human rights' lawyer Richard Warman told the London Independent on Sunday when asked why he sought to have David Icke's public events banned:[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
'He has taken all the conspiracy theories that ever existed and melded them together to create an even greater conspiracy of his own. His writings may be the work of a madman, or of a genuine racist. Either way they are very dangerous ...[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
... 'If he's unstable then so are his followers, who hang on his every word. What benefit can there be in allowing him to speak?'[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
That's right, a self-styled 'human rights' campaigner actually said: 'What benefit can there be in allowing him to speak?'[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
No, actually, they are also the opinions of David Icke[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Please circulate all of this information far and and wide. Thank-you.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Click here for more background to Richard Warman ...[/FONT]
