This brings up a question that's crossed my mind a few times.
Are the media ever embarrassed by the dumb questions they ask of athletes or are they (media) really that dumb?
Because as you say most athletes certainly aren't.
I watch the media very closely every day, I listen to team
1040 a little every day, and I listen to one on one interviews with players, coaches etc., and I know they aren't dumb, but they play a game that they seem to need
to play to keep their own jobs, but they have no shame, they
purposely embarrass themselves with the repetition of
questions, that have obvious answers, but they ask them
as though it really is a puzzle, and they need an answer
that will create either controversy or surprise, so they
can run back to their papers or radio shows and throw
it out to the public like a huge announcement.
eg. today I listened to salo give very intelligent answers
to their questions, but they kept coming back to the thing
they wanted to dig for, and that is, 'why' was he not practicing with the team. He told them it was a personal
thing, and that he was fine, and would be playing the first
playoff game, should have been enough right? wrong, they
kept coming back to that point, trying to get him to slip
up and say something they could get their heads around
that would make a story. He did well, and made them look
silly, and they are.
They thrive on the negative and the controversial, and
don't really like having to deal with the good that
happens and the success of others.
It is really quite pitiful.
I like the hockey analysts, mostly ex players, (some are not), eg. bob mcKenzie is excellent, and they address the
actual situations about teams, in an intelligent way, and
enlighten us as to what is going on with players in the NHL,
probabilities of trades etc., as the year goes by.
Dave Tomlinson, Ray Fararo and other Ex players are very good, they have lived the life, know the game inside and out, and tell it like it is.