History Lesson For Anti-Americans

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
I Think Not

Salutations!

You’re a proud American and that’s just swell, but having the power and opportunity to conquer the world and citing the fact that the United States didn’t do it and expecting to rally support on that basis is a peculiar argument in battling “Anti-Americanism”!

It’s like claiming moral superiority for not having committed a crime when presented with the opportunity. Britain was so busy fighting France and Spain and establishing empire all over the place (China, India, Canada, and Africa etc. etc. that it didn’t squash the thirteen colonies. Is it then reasonable to laud the British Empire for its history? Maybe there wouldn’t be so much Anti-Americanism if Britain had!

I’ve been participating in forums all over the world for more than ten years and the topic of American “evil” arises time and time again. And I’m willing to bet that this frequency of “Anti-Americanism” arises not because America has managed to NOT inflict great damage on other societies and cultures but because it has.

Great energy was expended both overtly and insidiously blowing the “threat” of communism into a giant bogyman. American military actions in many places all over the world were undertaken in the name of fighting communism. The Bay of Pigs, the Cuban Missile Crisis, American interference in Nicaragua, support for Suharto and Pinochet and a lengthy list of not so very nice folk hasn’t convinced the world to trust America. The war in Viet Nam, support for the Marcos regime in the Philippines, insurrections in East Timor and countless other petro-sites around the world instigated funded and supported by the United States are facts of history, not myths dreamed up by someone with an axe to grind.

It was both Soviet Russia and the United States of America that gave the world the Cold War and necessitated such wonderful phraseology as MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) and who both now control sufficient nuclear weapons to destroy the earth several times over… and you’re suggesting America should get a pat on the back for this?



Empires come and go, and so do politicians, but to pretend that the United States hasn’t participated in and been responsible for creating abetting and promulgating great hardship death and destruction all over the planet is nonsense.

Our current geopolitical dynamic is a direct result of America playing both sides of many many dirty little wars all over the place.

Great wealth (whereby the U.S. can supply weapons to both Iraq and Iran to name two) brings with it great responsibility. And America has wasted the far greater opportunity it has enjoyed to bring peace to the world in a variety of ways other than not flexing its military muscles.

The people of the United States present the largest single marketplace and appetite for everything from cocaine and heroin to methamphetamines and yet America has wailed about Afghans growing poppies and selling drugs as a means of raising money for the Taliban. The same goes for Venezuela Bolivia Columbia, Thailand, Mexico and so on. The finger is pointed at the suppliers and those nations and people are identified as the evil folk but the reality is that it is the United States that is the demand driving that particular marketplace.

The combination of Britain and the United States gave the world Israel and decades of simmering volatility that has forced Palestinians (Arab nations in general) to take up the cause of the Palestinian people in fighting an occupying force given that opportunity and supported in doing so by the United States and Britain. The United States supplies weapons of all kinds to Israel (won’t admit to nukes but everyone knows this to be true as well) and billions upon billions of dollars to Israel and turns a blind eye to the atrocities and inhumanity of the IDF and was happy to identify Arafat as a terrorist while completely ignoring the terrorism that Sharon has been documented as committing.

Many highly respected American authors statesmen and educators have soundly renounced many policies of the United States for decades. Noam Chomsky, Gore Vidal, for instance. Most recently Kurt Vonnegut was interviewed on CBC and all but cried for the level of corruption and witness of the rapid decline of American integrity and the actions of both the Clinton and the Bush administrations.

Benjamin Barber, Michael Adams and many many authors have (cuz they really like selling books and making money) taken significant time examining the American ethos and found significant issues of injustice and deep-seated malaise within the American “culture”.

Now the ‘come-back’ on much of the criticism leveled at America is that these kinds of issues are as valid in examining many nations not just America, but America NEVER admits to anything and swaggers around with pompous superiority telling the world that the American hold on moral behaviour and the “moral high road” belongs to America when the rest of the world knows this simply isn’t the case.

I’m not Anti-American I’m Anti-Bullshit and if that’s offensive to your patriotic sensibilities, then we’ll just have to agree to disagree but don’t think for a moment that the halo you’d have bobbing around the heads of Americans is believed by anyone!

Americans have treated the world with arrogance and disdain for a very long time.

The current undermining of the United Nations over the hoax of WMD in Iraq and the embarrassment that Colin Powel suffered presenting that pack of lies to the UN will never be forgotten by anyone. The Bush agenda of neo-conservative petro and econo-imperialism in conjunction with the chutzpah of telling the world that it is the right of America to tell nations who and who may not develop nuclear weapons is destroying America.

Is North Korea a nasty bad place run by a manman?? Maybe but the solution of building missile defense shields and promoting energy weapons development as the U.S. has done for years isn’t movement to peace but an invitation to practice asymmetrical warfare on a bully with no conscience and who’s demonstrated repeatedly that the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave is in fact just what Bob Zimmerman called it years ago, the Neighbourhood Bully.

Be proud, Americans have a great deal to be proud of….but don’t imagine for a moment that America is faultless in the mess this planet is in.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Wow!

Where to start.....

Well, first of all, if you think communism was an invented bogeyman, you have a problem with reality. That reality wouldinclude something like 15 or 20 million Russians killed by their communist regime, and perhaps 50 million Chinese killed by the regime that still exists in China.......to say nothing of 4 million Cambodians, etc. Communism is the force that murdered the most people in the twentieth century, by a very large margin. It was a great evil.

That does NOT excuse America for its support of Pinochet, Samoza, Suharto, and on and on, but America was by far the lesser of two evils ANYWHERE in the world, and to place those two clashing ideologies as relatively equal in worth is disengenuous at best.

You speak of the inhumanity of the IDF in the face of Palestinian terrorism? That says a lot right there. The Palestinians have been used as a pawn by the Arab nations, who have refused for 40 years to negotiate over the West Bank and Gaza. Thus the Palestinian refuges, some 750,000 of them, become almost 3 million, still at sea, still in all ways not accepted by the huge Arab nations surrounding them.........while little Israel absorbs 800,000 Jewish refugees kicked out of Arab countries with nothing............who is to blame for the Palestinian problem?

Noam Chomsky is an ivory-tower, hypocritical moron. Kurt Vonnegut is a great writer, but so shell-shocked and therefore pessimistic as to be not quite right. I do love his books, though. Gore Vidal is a good writer without any other claim to be an authority on anything.

EVERYBODY was fooled by WMDs in Iraq. Even the intelligence services of France and Germany believed they were there. A fact the anti-Americans consistently forget.

And yes, you are viciously anti-American. You ignore any good they have done in the world. You complain that they are corrupt and arrogant. You compare them on equal terms with the worst mass-murdering regimes known to history. You sneer at the suggestion of American "culture".

I think that puts you solidly in the camp of the anti-Americans.
 

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
MikeyDB said:
I’ve been participating in forums all over the world for more than ten years and the topic of American “evil” arises time and time again.

MikeyDB said:
Great energy was expended both overtly and insidiously blowing the “threat” of communism into a giant bogyman.

MikeyDB said:
The war in Viet Nam

Its interesting that Vietnamese officials are actively promoting their country for American investment.

Great wealth ... brings with it great responsibility.



Sorry. I couldn't resist.

And America has wasted the far greater opportunity it has enjoyed to bring peace to the world in a variety of ways other than not flexing its military muscles.

Why is it America's responsibility to bring peace to the world?

This is the problem with the critics of America. America is criticized when it uses its military and when it doesn't use its military. The critics want it both ways. It doesn't seem to dawn on them that there are other nations in the world.

Many highly respected American authors statesmen and educators have soundly renounced many policies of the United States for decades. Noam Chomsky, Gore Vidal, for instance. Most recently Kurt Vonnegut was interviewed on CBC and all but cried for the level of corruption and witness of the rapid decline of American integrity and the actions of both the Clinton and the Bush administrations.

So?

Benjamin Barber, Michael Adams and many many authors have (cuz they really like selling books and making money) taken significant time examining the American ethos and found significant issues of injustice and deep-seated malaise within the American “culture”.

Interesting that you use apostrophes around the word "culture." Below, you claim you are not anti-American. Such comments make it appear that you are.

but America NEVER admits to anything

Are you kidding? Where have you been the past 20 years? Have you not seen the self-flagellation this country has undergone over Vietnam?

and swaggers around with pompous superiority telling the world that the American hold on moral behaviour and the “moral high road” belongs to ...

I'll finish your sentence for you

"Canada".

And substitute "Canadian" for "American" as well.

Maybe you should look at the smug, self-righteous moralizing that goes on in Canada about the US.

I’m not Anti-American I’m Anti-Bullshit and if that’s offensive to your patriotic sensibilities, then we’ll just have to agree to disagree but don’t think for a moment that the halo you’d have bobbing around the heads of Americans is believed by anyone!

This sure seems anti-American.

telling the world that it is the right of America to tell nations who and who may not develop nuclear weapons is destroying America.

Well, actually, Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, I believe. So its the rest of the world who is telling Iran not to develop nuclear weapons. And it was the rest of the world who was telling Saddam, through various UN resolutions, to not have WMD.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Re: RE: History Lesson For Anti-Americans

Colpy said:
Noam Chomsky is an ivory-tower, hypocritical moron. Kurt Vonnegut is a great writer, but so shell-shocked and therefore pessimistic as to be not quite right. I do love his books, though. Gore Vidal is a good writer without any other claim to be an authority on anything.


You can have 85 kurt vonnegut , to at least balance noam chumsky opinion, and that is a fact, noam chumsky is a genious, period, you just can't refute that.


Colpy said:
EVERYBODY was fooled by WMDs in Iraq. Even the intelligence services of France and Germany believed they were there. A fact the anti-Americans consistently forget.

.


Wrong, and wrong, germany and france didnt believe there was WMD in iraq, actually wmd was a bureaucratic reason to get support for the war in iraq, simple as that, there was no intelligence error, only guillable and naive people will believe it.



The decision to highlight weapons of mass destruction as the main justification for going to war in Iraq was taken for "bureaucratic reasons", according to the US deputy defence secretary.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2945750.stm


Channel 4 News has seen minutes from that meeting, which took place in the White House on 31 January 2003. The two leaders discussed the possibility of securing further UN support, but President Bush made it clear that he had already decided to go to war. The details are contained in a new version of the book 'Lawless World' written by a leading British human rights lawyer, Philippe Sands QC.

President Bush said that:

"The US would put its full weight behind efforts to get another resolution and would 'twist arms' and 'even threaten'. But he had to say that if ultimately we failed, military action would follow anyway.''



http://www.channel4.com/news/special-reports/special-reports-storypage.jsp?id=1661




So try something else, than WMD, it just don't work with people who knows what happened these days.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
You fail to refute my claim that intelligence services the world over believed Iraq had WMD......because you can't.

Even those countries vehemently opposed to the invasion, such as France, Germany and China believed there were WMDs.

That is the truth. Bush et al did not lie about this, everyone (with the exception of some UN officials) thought there were WMDs.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Re: RE: History Lesson For Anti-Americans

Colpy said:
You fail to refute my claim that intelligence services the world over believed Iraq had WMD......because you can't.

Even those countries vehemently opposed to the invasion, such as France, Germany and China believed there were WMDs.

That is the truth. Bush et al did not lie about this, everyone (with the exception of some UN officials) thought there were WMDs.

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0601-02.htm

'French intelligence was telling us that there was effectively no real evidence of a WMD program That's why France wanted a longer extension on the weapons inspections. The French, the Germans and the Russians all knew there were no weapons there -- and so did Blair and Bush as that's what the French told them directly. Blair ignored what the French told us and instead listened to the Americans.'


http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/04/23/cia.iraq/


"[The source] told us that there were no active weapons of mass destruction programs," Drumheller is quoted as saying. "The [White House] group that was dealing with preparation for the Iraq war came back and said they were no longer interested. And we said 'Well, what about the intel?' And they said 'Well, this isn't about intel anymore. This is about regime change.' "


The CIA in 2002 had sent former ambassador Joseph Wilson to Niger to investigate the claims, and he went public in July 2003 criticizing the Bush administration's case for going to war in Iraq. The subsequent publication of his wife's identity as a CIA employee spawned an investigation that resulted in the indictment of Cheney's chief of staff and is still ongoing. (Full story)




So i say it again, french and german never said there was wmd in iraq before the war.
 

gc

Electoral Member
May 9, 2006
931
20
18
Stalin was a MUCH worse man than Hitler. Stalin purposely starved to death 10 million Ukrainians because he found them hard to get along with..........that is besides the other 10 million of his own people he murdered in various little political pogroms.......it is hard to even imagine living in stalinist Russia, where you could be (and people often were) shot for being late for work. On the murder scale, Hitler ranks only third, after Mao Tse-Tung and Joe Stalin.

If Hitler had not been stopped, he probably would have ranked first. Hitler is still worse in my opinion.
 

Wildnative

New Member
Jun 13, 2006
1
0
1
Vancouver, BC
I consider myself Canadian not American, Everyone in this world knows that if you say you're American automatically they think you live in the US. I have yet to meet a American that doesnt have a ego or who isnt arrogant. They think they're all that and a bag of chips. I love how in debt they are nice to know Canada's economy isnt as bad as the States, not saying ours is any better but hell they are waaaaaaaaay in debt as a nation.
 

gc

Electoral Member
May 9, 2006
931
20
18
Re: RE: History Lesson For Anti-Americans

Wildnative said:
I consider myself Canadian not American, Everyone in this world knows that if you say you're American automatically they think you live in the US. I have yet to meet a American that doesnt have a ego or who isnt arrogant. They think they're all that and a bag of chips. I love how in debt they are nice to know Canada's economy isnt as bad as the States, not saying ours is any better but hell they are waaaaaaaaay in debt as a nation.

Thier debt isn't that much bigger than ours, when you consider it per person. The U.S. is about 10 times the population of Canada, and has only a little more than 10 times the debt.
 

Hotshot

Electoral Member
May 31, 2006
330
0
16
Re: RE: History Lesson For Anti-Americans

Dexter Sinister said:
jimmoyer said:
Canadians are Americans too.

Aw knock if off jim. In common usage, that's simply not true. Identify yourself almost anywhere in the world as an American and you'll be taken to mean you're a citizen of the United States of America.

Call 'em Yankees: That is what they rterally are. I hate the United Snakes of America being called America. It ain't so.
 

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
Re: RE: History Lesson For Anti-Americans

Wildnative said:
I have yet to meet a American that doesnt have a ego or who isnt arrogant.

You haven't met many Americans then.

I find Americans to be generally friendlier and more outgoing than Canadians.
 

unclepercy

Electoral Member
Jun 4, 2005
821
15
18
Baja Canada
Re: RE: History Lesson For Anti-Americans

I think not said:
fuzzylogix said:
Even more than Canadians, the Mexicans, Latin Americans and South Americans will tell you that they are AMERICAN. In the common usage of the self centered US of A, America means the US of A, but in the rest of the world, many countries are insulted by this attitude as in THEIR common usage they are American.

Well then they should send a letter of complaint to the British and Europeans that started referring to the residents of the 13 colonies as Americans, in a condescending way I might add.

And I have been to Mexico and other areas of Central America, I have never heard of anyone even touch the subject.

I enjoyed your post so much, I wish you would continue on with more discussion of this subject.

I can't understand if we call Mexicans, "Mexican Americans" and Blacks, "African Americans" - then why not the term: "Canadian Americans?" The South Americans call themselves South Americans , but -then- they identify their country, i.e., Venezuela. Only the Canadians seem to bristle at such a suggestion, and I have no idea why.

Uncle
 

Anonymous

Electoral Member
Mar 24, 2002
783
0
16
Re: RE: History Lesson For Anti-Americans

Hotshot said:
Dexter Sinister said:
jimmoyer said:
Canadians are Americans too.

Aw knock if off jim. In common usage, that's simply not true. Identify yourself almost anywhere in the world as an American and you'll be taken to mean you're a citizen of the United States of America.

Call 'em Yankees: That is what they rterally are. I hate the United Snakes of America being called America. It ain't so.

Well that's ok, you'll just have to live with it.
 

fuzzylogix

Council Member
Apr 7, 2006
1,204
7
38
Re: RE: History Lesson For Anti-Americans

Said1 said:
fuzzylogix said:
Visit these countries. It's one of the first things you'll be told.

I was in Costa Rica, didn't hear that - in fact, they seemed more concerned about what Americans were up to, fashion wise, stuff like that - not all, but many of the young were. Not that i'm saying your full of crap, or anything.

But that was a loooooooong time ago, before I cared about culture and stuff.

Oh, but you are saying I am full of crap.

I must admit that I havent been to Costa Rica so maybe youre right. Maybe they care more about fashion than politics, or maybe you were just on a beach where politics werent discussed. I am amazed that someone who is apparently in the political sphere of Ottawa would not know that the rest of the Americas consider themselves American too. At least that is what many many people in Mexico, Brazil, Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, Peru, Panama, Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador told me. But what do they know?
 

jimmoyer

jimmoyer
Apr 3, 2005
5,101
22
38
69
Winchester Virginia
www.contactcorp.net
They'll tell you their South Americans, but if they
travel anywhere like say Europe, they'll say they are
Venezuelans (especially since Hugo Chavez commandeers a lot of air time) or they'll say they
are from their country, like Ecuador.

Chileans won't say they're Americans when visiting
Spain or France.

This subject of "We're all Americans too" has an
intellectual artificial dose of self righteousness to it. It's one of the more sillier aspects to the
self righteous bias of the times.

We've all discussed the historical orgins, and we all
know the common usage.

Let's hear some more whining about it.
 
Jun 19, 2006
4
0
1
russia
I think not said:
How many nations could genuinely say that they had the potential to conquer the world or destroy it? How many nations ever had an arsenal capable of obliterating any other nation without risking retaliation?

How many nations, with an army and navy superior to any others, and an economy capable of producing more weapons and material than any other, with forces already deployed for conquest, would try to conquer the world while they had such advantages?
Sixty years ago, this was exactly situation in which our nation, the United States of America, found itself.

American military forces were already deployed around the world in 1946. The American economy was already mobilized for war - and was already the arsenal for all other world powers. America was in sole possession of the most destructive weapon ever invented by human beings and could, quite conceivably, destroy whatever was remaining of the rest of the world without being at risk.

Nations like the Soviet Union, Britain, Germany, Japan and China were near ruin. Their populations were demoralized, their military forces and arsenals depleted. Their cities and towns were demolished. We could easily have conquered the world.
If we Americans were the imperialists "peace" proponents say we are, we would have.

What actions did we take? What was the response of our "imperialist" government? Did we conquer other nations? Did we use our nuclear weapons to demand ransom for other countries? Did we impose reparations or invade our former allies? Did we exploit our advantages to conquer the world?
No, instead we offered to rebuild the nations destroyed by war. We allowed other nation's armies to occupy the territory we conquered. However, most of all, in a gesture that was the most altruistic in human history, we offered to destroy our nuclear weapons.

The United States of America, the world's only nuclear superpower, in June 1946, presented to the United Nations a plan that eliminated America's atomic bomb monopoly. This plan, called the Baruch Plan after FDR's adviser Bernard Baruch, proposed the creation of an international commission to monitor and develop nuclear power for peaceful purposes only, and to ensure no other country would develop nuclear weapons.

Would Stalin's Soviet Union have done such a thing?
How about Nazi Germany? Fascist Italy? Imperial Japan?
What about Communist China or North Korea - nations that many of America's critics adore?
How about the peace-loving peoples of Castro's Cuba or Chavez' Venezuela?
What about Baathist Iraq? Would there have been a Saddam Hussein Disarmament Plan presented to the U.N.?
How about Iran?

Instead of using our nuclear weapons to conquer, we offered to disarm ourselves. We wanted to create a world where nuclear energy was used only for peace.
The U.N. rejected the plan. It was vetoed by the U.S.S.R.
Yet, some people, like USA Today columnist Julianne Malveaux, say America is a terrorist nation. We are lectured that we are a nation whose only concern is controlling the world.
When you hear such claims, remember the Baruch Plan. Especially remember this as we are treated, by the mainstream media, to the sight of anti-war protestors, led by anti-Americans, who will tell us that America has murdered more civilians than any other country and mention that we are the only country ever to use nuclear weapons.

Of course, these "peace" activists will not mention the Baruch plan.
The "peace" protesters will say that Japan was close to surrendering and we did not have to use the bomb.
This is not true. If Japan were close to surrendering, why did they not do so even after Hiroshima? Another bomb had to be used at Nagasaki, which, if anything, indicated the fanaticism of the Japanese Empire of the Sun.

These "protestors" will never tell you that more civilians were killed during the Battle of Berlin or the Battle of Stalingrad between the U.S.S.R. and the Nazis, than were killed at Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. They will not say that about as many civilians were killed during the Battle of Manila. Therefore, in this sense, the bombings at Hiroshima and Nagasaki probably saved lives.

None of these pertinent facts will be mentioned because those who lead the campaign for peace are not concerned about peace. They are concerned about obtaining political and economic control of the United States.

When Baruch spoke to the U.N. to present his plan, he began his speech by saying, "We are here to make a choice between the quick and the dead. That is our business...If we fail, then we have damned every man to be the slave of fear."
Damning people is exactly what the so-called peace activists have in mind.

http://www.theeveningbulletin.com/s...6766004&BRD=2737&PAG=461&dept_id=574088&rfi=6[/quote

IGNORANCE IS VERY DANGEROUS!!!!!