Has climate change been disproved? Large Hadron cast DOUBT on global warming

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,123
8,141
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
Has climate change been disproved? Large Hadron boffins cast shock DOUBT on global warming



Boffins from CERN have also discovered projected temperature increases over the next century may have been over estimated.

Researchers found trees may have been putting similar aerosols into the air as burning fossil fuels, long before the industrial revolution, meaning humans may have had less impact on the climate than we thought.

Scientists made the discovery during an experiment to create an artificial cloud that was thought could help cool Earth and reverse global warming.

A study published this week in the journal Nature has looked more closely at the tiny particles within clouds, known as cloud seeds, that help cool the planet and found they can be produced naturally.

Clouds, including natural ones and those from aerosols, are seen by the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as the single biggest source of uncertainty about the so-called human-caused climate change.

The problem stems from not knowing how cloudy the world was before the industrial era, and the fact that some of the gases produced by burning fossil fuels said to warm the plant in the long-term, actually help cool it in the short-term through cloud formation.

But now CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, have left the issue even more confusing after discovering, while creating the fake cloud, that trees could have been putting these aerosols into the atmosphere since they first grew at the time of the dinosaurs.



Their scientists run the LCH - the world's biggest physics experiment in Geneva, Switzerland.

To make matters more confusing, there are two types of partials.

Direct aerosol particles come from dust, sea salt, and the burning of biomass.

Secondary aerosol particles are formed when gas is converted into a particle, and are responsible for more than half of all cloud seeds in our atmosphere.

Until this study, scientists thought sulphuric acid, largely produced with fossil fuel emissions, was needed to form secondary aerosols, and therefore responsible for the bulk of global warming aerosols.

However, the research found the Earth actually produces these particles naturally, without any interference from man.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIeY7Zj27IM

The particles are created by a mix of tree vapours and cosmic rays - high-energy particles bombarding the atmosphere from outside our solar system.

Jasper Kirkby, CERN particle physicist and originator and spokesperson of the CLOUD experiment, said: "We found that nature produces particles without pollution.

"That is going to require a rethink of how human activities have increased aerosols in clouds."

The results may turn the whole climate change debate and projected temperature increases upside down, they said.

Climate change projections had always taken it that the amount of aerosol seeded clouds in the pre-industrial age would have been much less than since industrialisation.

But the findings mean the amounts could have been the same or just slightly less.

An abundance of clouds in the preindustrial era - something the new study hints at - would mean less warming in the future.

This means current estimates of projected warming in the 21st century could be reduced, the study concluded.



Compared to the massive LCH, the cloud chamber for the Cosmics Leaving Outdoor Droplets (CLOUD) experiment at CERN was just a three-metre-wide stainless-steel chamber.

Inside, experts used vapours to recreate Earth’s atmosphere before injecting ultraviolet rays to simulate sunlight.

They directed a beam of artificial cosmic rays from a CERN particle accelerator at the chamber.

They found aerosol particles form 10 to 100 times more abundantly if an ion from a cosmic ray is in the centre of the cluster.

Mr Kirby said: "Since time immemorial nature has had a perfectly good way of making cloud seeds throughout atmosphere by this gas to particle conversion and that’s new.

"Previous knowledge was that you required sulphuric acid - and that sulphuric acid is dominated by human activities."

Despite the findings, Mr Kirby stopped short of saying humans played no role in global warming, but stressed projected increases in temperature will come down.

He said: "Human impact is not going to go away.

"Temperature will still go up and warming will still occur. But now that we’ve got this important result that is going to pin down the pre-industrial atmosphere, it’s going to sharpen our results and shrink the range of predictions."

source: Has climate change been disproved? Large Hadron boffins cast shock DOUBT on global warming | Science | News | Daily Express

..............................................

Eh MentalFloss :)

What do you have to say about this... ?
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,884
124
63
Anthropogenic climate change has never been proved so it's very hard to disprove, that's why the ecotards like it..
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
27,856
10,362
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Anthropogenic climate change has never been proved so it's very hard to disprove, that's why the ecotards like it..
I’m sure we (humans) have some effect, as does cattle, as do ants and plankton and volcanoes and solar cycles and tectonic plate shifts and Milenković cycles and so on and so forth. How much of the “some effect” for each is what’s debatable.

The "butterfly effect" in chaos theory describes how small initial changes in a complex system can lead to large, unpredictable outcomes, often attributed to the idea that a butterfly flapping its wings could hypothetically cause a hurricane.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
115,692
13,690
113
Low Earth Orbit
I’m sure we (humans) have some effect, as does cattle, as do ants and plankton and volcanoes and solar cycles and tectonic plate shifts and Milenković cycles and so on and so forth. How much of the “some effect” for each is what’s debatable.

The "butterfly effect" in chaos theory describes how small initial changes in a complex system can lead to large, unpredictable outcomes, often attributed to the idea that a butterfly flapping its wings could hypothetically cause a hurricane.
It can't be proven without a control planet. Science n such has rules.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
27,856
10,362
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
It's doesn't impact the electromagnetics of the entire Universe.
What if it was a really big Mothra sized electrical rightwing butterfly flapping it’s lips wings on the other side of the planet?
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
115,692
13,690
113
Low Earth Orbit
What if it was a really big Mothra sized electrical rightwing butterfly flapping it’s lips wings on the other side of the planet?
Poor Tokyo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina