Caleb-Dain Matton what is your definition of terrorism?
I wonder if you can define it without pointing fingers. Think about it.
I wonder if you can define it without pointing fingers. Think about it.
Harper's Dirty Little Secret
- Thread starter Caleb-Dain Matton
- Start date
Caleb-Dain Matton
are you a:
1) hating hateful hater
2) hurtful hatemonger of hate
3) moron
answer honestly
are you a:
1) hating hateful hater
2) hurtful hatemonger of hate
3) moron
answer honestly
Re: RE: Harper's Dirty Little Secret
I'd have to go with 2, although it doesn't make alot of sense. Yes, I hate hateful people and hateful policies such as Harper, Israel and America's. Hope this clears it up.
iARTthere4iam said:
I'd have to go with 2, although it doesn't make alot of sense. Yes, I hate hateful people and hateful policies such as Harper, Israel and America's. Hope this clears it up.
I think the point was that our PM is more interested in being pals with the great powerfull Bush cabal than in representing the majority of Canadian opinion.
Harper is a warmonger,and a fossil fool , and is therefore leading us towards, rather than away from the two greatest threats we have now - global warming and global warfare between Islam and Christian Radicals.
But that would be off topic. The honest anwer is that none of the above apply to any of the polls here today!! Harper is A Bush Brownnoser, but I doubt if anything sexual is taking place, lol.
Besides, who could kiss that Condom-leaser Rice?
Harper is a warmonger,and a fossil fool , and is therefore leading us towards, rather than away from the two greatest threats we have now - global warming and global warfare between Islam and Christian Radicals.
But that would be off topic. The honest anwer is that none of the above apply to any of the polls here today!! Harper is A Bush Brownnoser, but I doubt if anything sexual is taking place, lol.
Besides, who could kiss that Condom-leaser Rice?
RE: Harper's Dirty Little
Ahh.. quick observation which I think is relevant to this-
Yesterday, Stevie Harper made that ridiculous crack about how he was going to continue to support Israel FULLY in the current agressive war they're waging and "our" stance in Afghanistan would not be altered, especially not to suit the positions of "special interest groups", and all's I could think was "since WHEN is a majority of our friggin population a 'special interest group'"???? man alive, it's the dubya-talk all over again... and when he cracked open the jug of "stay the course" I wondered if perhaps my radio hadn't drifted to an item about the US idiot in chief... but alas, it WAS our very own little-league idiot in chief... wish we had some aircraft carriers for Stevie to land on once we "accomplish" "our" "mission" in Afghanistan
Ahh.. quick observation which I think is relevant to this-
Yesterday, Stevie Harper made that ridiculous crack about how he was going to continue to support Israel FULLY in the current agressive war they're waging and "our" stance in Afghanistan would not be altered, especially not to suit the positions of "special interest groups", and all's I could think was "since WHEN is a majority of our friggin population a 'special interest group'"???? man alive, it's the dubya-talk all over again... and when he cracked open the jug of "stay the course" I wondered if perhaps my radio hadn't drifted to an item about the US idiot in chief... but alas, it WAS our very own little-league idiot in chief... wish we had some aircraft carriers for Stevie to land on once we "accomplish" "our" "mission" in Afghanistan
Re: RE: Harper's Dirty Little
So, if we are to be ruled by polls, why do we need a government at all? Hell, we'll just turn the whole mess over to Angus-Reid, and live happily ever after.
I was SO relieved to be rid of government by finger in the breeze when the Conservatives won the last election. I am even more pleased with them now that they are holding to a principled stand, even though it might be costing them politically. Many kudos to Harper et. al.
As for our mission in Afghanistan, I see the goal of stabilizing that fractious nation as a little pie-in-the-sky, but worth the attempt. If we are not successful, at least we will have succeeded in what is essentially a holding action, preventing the Taliban from returning to power and Afghanistan becoming Training and Control Central for whatever bunch of Islamist loonys fell like getting 72 virgins this month.
As for stabilizing the country? I would be surprized, and very pleased, if that happened in my lifetime.
mabudon said:Ahh.. quick observation which I think is relevant to this-
Yesterday, Stevie Harper made that ridiculous crack about how he was going to continue to support Israel FULLY in the current agressive war they're waging and "our" stance in Afghanistan would not be altered, especially not to suit the positions of "special interest groups", and all's I could think was "since WHEN is a majority of our friggin population a 'special interest group'"???? man alive, it's the dubya-talk all over again... and when he cracked open the jug of "stay the course" I wondered if perhaps my radio hadn't drifted to an item about the US idiot in chief... but alas, it WAS our very own little-league idiot in chief... wish we had some aircraft carriers for Stevie to land on once we "accomplish" "our" "mission" in Afghanistan
So, if we are to be ruled by polls, why do we need a government at all? Hell, we'll just turn the whole mess over to Angus-Reid, and live happily ever after.
I was SO relieved to be rid of government by finger in the breeze when the Conservatives won the last election. I am even more pleased with them now that they are holding to a principled stand, even though it might be costing them politically. Many kudos to Harper et. al.
As for our mission in Afghanistan, I see the goal of stabilizing that fractious nation as a little pie-in-the-sky, but worth the attempt. If we are not successful, at least we will have succeeded in what is essentially a holding action, preventing the Taliban from returning to power and Afghanistan becoming Training and Control Central for whatever bunch of Islamist loonys fell like getting 72 virgins this month.
As for stabilizing the country? I would be surprized, and very pleased, if that happened in my lifetime.
Re: RE: Harper's Dirty Little
No, I only feel that way some days.
I'm 51.
Caleb-Dain Matton said:
No, I only feel that way some days.
I'm 51.
I found the question in this thread amusing. I believe caleb is trying to be funny--which is splendid. I dont see the homophobia alluded to . Im no fan of Harper, but if he is in love with Bush and or Blair --that is his business--I would not hold that against him. Same sex relationships between international state terrrorists is a reality we might all have to accept--now that Maggie and Liz are getting too old and frail to pull their tricks for the good old boys.
I can't wait till GWB is out of office so that all the the Bush-wackers will have to find something/ someone else to blame the worlds problems on.
I don't think Bush is the puppetmaster of the globe. If Harper takes a stance on something, right or wrong, I have to hold him accountable not bush I don't vote for bush.
I don't think Bush is the puppetmaster of the globe. If Harper takes a stance on something, right or wrong, I have to hold him accountable not bush I don't vote for bush.