Hamas Wins

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
Re: RE: Hamas Wins

the caracal kid said:
the problems stem from petty tribalisms, thats how!

you say "we owe america",....

i say that all of humanity is part of the system and as such we owe, if anything, to our fellow humans. We owe not to constructs that divide such as nations.

Wednesday's Child from other thread said:
To Kill an American

You probably missed it in the rush of news last week, but there was actually a report that someone in Pakistan had published in a newspaper an offer of a reward to anyone who killed an American, any American.

So an Australian dentist wrote an editorial the following day to let everyone know what an American is . So they would know when they found one. (Good one, mate!!!!)

"An American is English, or French, or Italian, Irish, German, Spanish, Polish, Russian or Greek. An American may also be Canadian, Mexican, African, Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Australian, Iranian, Asian, or Arab, or Pakistani or Afghan. "

An American may also be a Comanche, Cherokee, Osage, Blackfoot, Navaho, Apache, Seminole or one of the many other tribes known as Native Americans.

An American is Christian, or he could be Jewish, or Buddhist, or Muslim. In fact, there are more Muslims in America than in Afghanistan. The only difference is that in America they are free to worship as each of them chooses.

An American is also free to believe in no religion. For that he will answer only to God, not to the government, or to armed thugs claiming to speak for the government and for God.

An American lives in the most prosperous land in the history of the world. The root of that prosperity can be found in the Declaration of Independence, which recognizes the God given right of each person to the pursuit of happiness.

An American is generous. Americans have helped out just about every other nation in the world in their time of need, never asking a thing in return.

When Afghanistan was over-run by the Soviet army 20 years ago, Americans came with arms and supplies to enable the people to win back their country!

As of the morning of September 11, Americans had given more than any other nation to the poor in Afghanistan. Americans welcome the best of everything...the best products, the best books, the best music, the best food, the best services. But they also welcome the least.

The national symbol of America, The Statue of Liberty, welcomes your tired and your poor, the wretched refuse of your teeming shores, the homeless, tempest tossed. These in fact are the people who built America.

Some of them were working in the Twin Towers the morning of September 11, 2001 earning a better life for their families. It's been told that the World Trade Center victims were from at least 30 different countries, cultures, and first languages, including those that aided and abetted the terrorists.

So you can try to kill an American if you must. Hitler did. So did General Tojo, and Stalin, and Mao Tse-Tung, and other blood-thirsty tyrants in the world. But, in doing so you would just be killing yourself. Because Americans are not a particular people from a particular place. They are the embodiment of the human spirit of freedom. Everyone who holds to that spirit, everywhere, is an American.
 

zoofer

Council Member
Dec 31, 2005
1,274
2
38
One would expect a decent newspaper to refuse to print that terrorist's offer. No other word fits the weirdo.
 

zoofer

Council Member
Dec 31, 2005
1,274
2
38
Many years ago, probably before Jay was born, :D I pasted an educational post by Dennis Prager. He wisely observed that peace would not come until after Palestine had a civil war. In other words Palestinians themselves have to defeat the terrorists.
So far it looks like the terrorists are winning that war. It may be a battle lost but the war is far from over. It will take decades, not one election.
[The Hamas electoral victory:] Democracy's bitter fruit
by Daniel Pipes
National Post
January 27, 2006
http://www.danielpipes.org/article/3321

Now that Hamas has apparently won the Palestinian elections, the West is hoist with its own petard.

On the one hand, Hamas is a terrorist group that unabashedly targets Israeli civilians and calls for the elimination of the Jewish state. On the other hand, it just won what observers deem to have been a reasonably fair election, and so enjoys the legitimacy that comes from the ballot box. Every foreign ministry now confronts a dilemma: Nudge it to moderation or give up on it as irredeemably extremist? Meet with Hamas members or avoid them? Continue to donate to the Palestinian Authority or starve it of funds?

This double bind is of our own making because, with Washington in the lead, virtually every Western government adopted a two-prong approach to solving the problems of the Middle East.

The negative prong consists of fighting terrorism. A "war on terror" is underway, involving military forces in the field, toughened financial laws, and an array of espionage tools.

The positive prong involves promoting democracy. The historical record shows that democratic countries almost never make war on each other, and tend to be prosperous. Therefore, elections appear to be what the doctor ordered for the maladies of the Middle East.

But that combination has failed this troubled region. The first functional election in the Palestinian Authority has thrown up Hamas. In December, 2005, the Egyptian electorate came out strongly for the Muslim Brotherhood, a radical Islamic party, and not for liberal elements. In Iraq, the post-Saddam electorate voted in a pro-Iranian Islamist as prime minister. In Lebanon, the voters celebrated the withdrawal of Syrian troops by voting Hezbollah into the government. Likewise, radical Islamic elements have prospered in elections in Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan.

In brief, elections are bringing to power the most deadly enemies of the West. What went wrong? Why has a democratic prescription that's proven successful in Germany, Japan and other formerly bellicose nations not worked in the Middle East?

It's not Islam or some cultural factor that accounts for this difference; rather, it is the fact that ideological enemies in the Middle East have not yet been defeated. Democratization took place in Germany, Japan, and the Soviet Union after their populations had endured the totalitarian crucible. By 1945 and 1991, they recognized what disasters fascism and communism had brought them, and were primed to try a different path.

That's not the case in the Middle East, where a totalitarian temptation remains powerfully in place. Muslims across the region – with the singular and important exception of Iran – are drawn to the Islamist program with its slogan that "Islam is the solution." That was the case from Iran in 1979 to Algeria in 1992 to Turkey in 2002 to the Palestinian Authority this week.

This pattern has several implications for Western governments:

Slow down: Take heed that an impatience to move the Middle East to democracy is consistently backfiring by bringing our most deadly enemies to power.
Settle in for the long run: However worthy the democratic goal, it will take decades to accomplish.
Defeat radical Islam: Only when Muslims see that this is a route doomed to failure will they be open to alternatives.
Appreciate stability: Stability must not be an end in itself, but its absence likely leads to anarchy and radicalization.
Returning to the dilemma posed by the Hamas victory, Western capitals need to show Palestinians that – like Germans electing Hitler in 1933 – they have made a decision gravely unacceptable to civilized opinion. The Hamas-led Palestinian Authority must be isolated and rejected at every turn, thereby encouraging Palestinians to see the error of their ways.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To see the Daniel Pipes archive, go to http://www.DanielPipes.org

You may freely forward this information, but on condition that you send the text as an integral whole along with complete information about its author, date, and source.
*Emphasis mine.
 

DasFX

Electoral Member
Dec 6, 2004
859
1
18
Whitby, Ontario
Re: RE: Hamas Wins

Jay said:
Everyone who holds to that spirit, everywhere, is an American.

Good lord, way to ruin my weekend. I thought there was no name-calling or personal attacks allowed on this site. Please, how could you call me an American? Sure I'll concede that I am a North American, but that is it.

It is easy to get all misty eyed when one talks only about the virtues and good parts of the USA, but I could write something equally as truthful which could paint the US as the most wretched place on earth.

There are two sides to every coin, can you at least for even a second trying looking at it from the other side.
 

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
Good lord, way to ruin my weekend. I thought there was no name-calling or personal attacks allowed on this site. Please, how could you call me an American? Sure I'll concede that I am a North American, but that is it.

It is easy to get all misty eyed when one talks only about the virtues and good parts of the USA, but I could write something equally as truthful which could paint the US as the most wretched place on earth.

There are two sides to every coin, can you at least for even a second trying looking at it from the other side.

Good point.

First the 33% of Americans who can't even get reasonable health care. The poor, as well.

The lack in union, the governments in America are pro-business, so it is easier to fire someone.
 

nitzomoe

Electoral Member
Dec 31, 2004
334
0
16
Toronto
Re: RE: Hamas Wins

Jay said:
Like it or not they are our largest trading partner, they make up alot of our bread and butter. We have also been riding their defense policy for some time now. We can also thank them for standing up to the Russians. Europe owes them too. They aren't perfect, but they are worthy of respect.

They are a great nieghbour IMO.

a lot of ppl tend to forget that before NAFTA the US still traded with us and in most cases they were a tad bit less arrogant than they are right now. They also depend on us for trade not so much but they still do. Canadians are justified in viewing america in in hostility because of the way US acts. It has never really followed international rules, flaunts its might whenever it pleases them and has f*cked many countries, sometimes beyond redemption. They dont deserve any respect whatsoever.

Standing up to the russians? hopefully your not talking about Reganomics cause that actually didnt work, most ppl(intellectuals, economists and regular joes) agree that the russian system collapsed on its own with little to to no effect by the US.

I personally think the states doesnt deserve an ounce of respect and the nation should be charged with a whole list of crimes, many of which they tend to charge others with. They act just like any otehr colonialist nation, blaming those who wish to defend their lands from hegemony as horrible ppl, justifing massacres and destruction of other nations and stealing the wealth of other nations while condemning those nations leaders as currupt or vile.

I have always had contempt for colonialist nations, mostly because they are the very same nations now denouncing current despots for mimicking them.
 

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
Hamas — Unacceptable

While the Hamas Government may have been elected by the people, that does not require the Government of Canada to treat said government like they would any other.

If our Government is aware that theirs would be associated with terrorism, then we are under an obligation to at least endeavour to correct their errors. For example, it couldn't hurt to invite (under extremely close supervision and security, of course) members of the Hamas Government to some sort of interparliamentary committee meetings.

In my opinion, it is possible for anyone to be reasoned with — even terrorists.

If we can show them that we are not their enemies (while still protecting the citizens of Canada from their potential threat), then we should exercise every reasonable avenue to that end.
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Jersay said:
Agree totally nitzomoe.

There are a few colonial countries still left in the world, but America is the biggest and strongest of them all.

Really Jersay? Care to share some information on all these colonies? Where might they be?
 

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
Really Jersay? Care to share some information on all these colonies? Where might they be?

Why certainly,

Georgia, India, Iraq, South America, and others.

You don't need troops to be imperial or colonial.

Just look at what America is trying to impose on India. :D
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Jersay said:
Really Jersay? Care to share some information on all these colonies? Where might they be?

Why certainly,

Georgia, India, Iraq, South America, and others.

You don't need troops to be imperial or colonial.

Just look at what America is trying to impose on India. :D

You don't need troops to be colonial or imperial? What do you need? Bad manners?

Are you freakin kidding me Jersay? The US is a colonial power? You should know better since you were a colony, and still have ties to that power.
 

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
Are you freakin kidding me Jersay? The US is a colonial power? You should know better since you were a colony, and still have ties to that power.

What's is Puerto Rico?

How about Hawaii?

Alaska?

When the time came for them to vote for independence, commonwealth, or becoming a state, how come in the 1950s, when the U.N consider these places colonies of America that independence wasn't offered.
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Hawaii and Alaska are states :?

Puerto Rico is a territory, you know, like YOUR Northwest Territories. And they voted on becoming a state and said no (big surprise, they pay no taxes).

Quit playing semantics Jersay, its not washing, go ask the people of Hawaii and Alaska if they consider themselves a colony.
 

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
What about the native people of Alaska and Hawaii.

And I would admit the same for the native people of the North West Territories.

look up UNPO,

Unrecognized Nations and Peoples Organization.
 

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
Canada was considered a "Dominion" of the United Kingdom until only a few decades ago; that's not a far cry from being a colony. I don't see why some seem to consider the term to be so negative! I cannot see any serious problem with acknowledging one's origin or history.
 

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
Canada was considered a "Dominion" of the United Kingdom until only a few decades ago; that's not a far cry from being a colony. I don't see why some seem to consider the term to be so negative! I cannot see any serious problem with acknowledging one's origin or history.

Sometimes colony can be good or bad. In European sense of Canada, colony was good but i wouldn't be so sure with the ethnic minorities and aboriginals in Canada.
 

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
I can certainly see your point.

In some ways, Canada's treatment of our First Nations people has been deplorable — and yet in other senses, perhaps equally as admirable. It is an extremely complex issue [relations with First Nations people in Canada].

I would think that we need to acknowledge both our feats, and our faults, and move forward from there, considering the needs of the First Nations people, in conjunction with the prosperity of Canada.