Why would the just let the prisoners go??
Wouldn't they deport them back to the sh:t hole country they belong???
Guantánamo reports 106 captives still on hunger strike
- Thread starter B00Mer
- Start date
Why would the just let the prisoners go??
Wouldn't they deport them back to the sh:t hole country they belong???
Well after turning Mecca into a nuclear wasteland.
What would the Muslim world do?
What do we do next?
You apparently think they are dumber than I do. I give them more credit for having enough smarts to not tempt the rest of the world.
I certainly don't think they as dumb as you. You would start the 3rd world war as a religious cleansing. I am appalled you live in the same country I do. You are obviously just as fanatical as those you would bomb. You disappoint me greatly, I thought you were a better person than to promote mass-murder based upon religion. You have no way out of this, you are equal, if not worse than those you espouse your hatred for.
As I said do you really think they would take the chance of risking Mecca? They aren't that stupid. Apparently you disagree and think they are that dumb!
The fanatics would gladly let it happen in order to mobilize a billion Muslims to all-out war against the west, which is what would happen. You are obviously not quite able to see the actual ramifications.
Besides all that what about the terrorism by the US and allies against Muslim states. Illegal invasion for oil and to install puppet regimes. No Christianna, there is no side without blood on their hands in this mess. Unfortunately people like you get convinced by propaganda that the west somehow has a right to interfere and invade other sovereign nations or retaliate against the retaliation of the other side. All you do is perpetuate an un-winnable war and escalate it to epic proportions.
Isn't that the same as letting them go? The republicans would have another fit about that.
They would not let Mecca go, pure and simple that is the one place ALL Muslims find sacred.
I can repost the links from Das that indicate that the President made those promises at a point in time when the Dems controlled both houses.
... So, what's the excuse now?
What's stopping him now, Obamacare was pushed through Congress without a majority of the American people's approval and certainly without bipartisan approval.. what's stopping him on Gitmo..
I know, I know.. Blame Bush.
Well actually much of it is the Cheney/Bush admins fault. It will take many many more years to clean up the mess they made.
Too funny. So if a Democrat wins the next Presidential election they will STILL blame Bush?
Me too. And look who the parrots are blaming AGAIN.
I can blame Bush for his illegal invasions and for opening the facility to begin with and the criminality of him filling it up. I can also blame Obama for saying multiple times he would close it and not doing so. I can also blame the congress & the Senate for their various roles in keeping it open and mostly I can blame the majority of American people for being so stupid as to blindly believe the sh*t they were spoon-fed by men with an agenda and allowing it all to happen.
There is plenty of blame to go around so share it evenly.
We have discussed this before - that was when HCR was the top priority.
Republicans can do it now if they wish and nobody is stopping them.
We have also discussed this before - Obamacare was priority one in the DNC platform when it got majority support. Too bad Obama allowed it to get watered down thanks to all the lobbying by the Tea Baggers are we would have had real reform just like you have in Canada.
Obama could pardon the Gitmo resisters and free them. Can anyone tell me why he doesn't adopt that simple approach?