Green groups begin campaign to tell Obama about Alberta's 'dirtiest oil'

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC

Environmental groups in Canada and the United States are running this advertisement in a Washington newspaper to send a message to U.S. President Barack Obama that Alberta's oilsands should not be part of America's new energy plan.

Green groups begin campaign to tell Obama about Alberta's 'dirtiest oil'

A coalition of Canadian and U.S. environmental groups has launched a cross-border campaign ahead of Barack Obama's visit to Canada, urging the U.S. president to stick to his new energy plan amid possible pleas for him to support oil production from the Alberta oilsands.

Toronto-based Environmental Defence, Washington-based Earthworks and 14 other groups have produced a newspaper advertising campaign that will start running Tuesday. They are also launching Obama2Canada.org and urging supporters to sign petitions to Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Obama, who will visit Ottawa on Feb. 19.

One ad — aimed at lawmakers and running in Roll Call, a prominent Capitol Hill newspaper in Washington — says: "On February 19 Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper will try to sell President Obama on a North American climate pact that gives special treatment to the tarsands in Alberta, the source of the dirtiest oil on earth. Tarsands don't fit into the new energy economy."

Matt Price, project manager at Environmental Defence, told CBC News the campaign is a reaction against the tarsands sales pitch. "We'd like a pursuit of a green jobs agenda in North America," he said.

Obama's "new energy economy means a green economy, and the tarsands just don't fit," Rick Smith, Environmental Defence Canada's executive director, said in a release. "Tarsands oil is dirty oil. We need to eliminate both the carbon emissions and the toxic pollution that is destroying the environment and harming human health."

The groups have long criticized the oilsands, pointing to the large amounts of energy required to extract bitumen and the waste created by the process.

Canada is the largest foreign supplier of oil to the U.S., exporting nearly two million barrels per day, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Environment Minister Jim Prentice has defended Alberta's oilsands production as "a reality" that is not going away, and has said the U.S. will realize oil from that source is important to its future.

Doesn't cover the environmental issues now does it? Tunnel Vision reality if you ask me.

This could be a dent in Alberta's profits, although I doubt Obama would stop getting oil from Canada, as his main goal was to stop getting oil from over seas..... kinda hard to do that without oil from us.
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
72
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Besides that, when the price of oil drops, it becomes quite costly to tap the oil sands. Crude from pools is easier to refine.
But, they are right, Canada should be looking towards dealing more with other countries and quit relying so much on US trade. The US has been known to bite the hand that feeds it.

Some color just for Prax.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.

Environmental groups in Canada and the United States are running this advertisement in a Washington newspaper to send a message to U.S. President Barack Obama that Alberta's oilsands should not be part of America's new energy plan.

Green groups begin campaign to tell Obama about Alberta's 'dirtiest oil'



Doesn't cover the environmental issues now does it? Tunnel Vision reality if you ask me.

This could be a dent in Alberta's profits, although I doubt Obama would stop getting oil from Canada, as his main goal was to stop getting oil from over seas..... kinda hard to do that without oil from us.

I'm wondering if perhaps the "Green Groups" should start listening more and talking less, as Obama seems to have his head screwed on straight and will probably reach a lot of the correct decisions regardless. Not all is perfect with the tarsands by any stretch of the imagination BUT by the same token we don't want to throw the baby out with the bath water.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Besides that, when the price of oil drops, it becomes quite costly to tap the oil sands. Crude from pools is easier to refine.
But, they are right, Canada should be looking towards dealing more with other countries and quit relying so much on US trade. The US has been known to bite the hand that feeds it.

.

And visa versa
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
I'm wondering if perhaps the "Green Groups" should start listening more and talking less, as Obama seems to have his head screwed on straight and will probably reach a lot of the correct decisions regardless. Not all is perfect with the tarsands by any stretch of the imagination BUT by the same token we don't want to throw the baby out with the bath water.

I would want to believe you but if his stimulus package is any indication of his term we may be deeper than we already are. His own VP said the package has a 1 in 3 chance of failing. Those aren't good odds. The Wall St. Journal said if the package fails we will have little ammunition left.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
I would want to believe you but if his stimulus package is any indication of his term we may be deeper than we already are. His own VP said the package has a 1 in 3 chance of failing. Those aren't good odds. The Wall St. Journal said if the package fails we will have little ammunition left.

That's ok, Canada is in the same boat..... the only difference is that most of Canada already knows this half assed plan of Harpers' really won't do anything and it's nothing but chucking money into the fan blades.... the chances of this budget working is practically zero.

At least you guys have better odds.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
I would want to believe you but if his stimulus package is any indication of his term we may be deeper than we already are. His own VP said the package has a 1 in 3 chance of failing. Those aren't good odds. The Wall St. Journal said if the package fails we will have little ammunition left.

I think you speak some good wisdom, but from what you say I tend to look at it as the glass being 2/3 full. Let's run with that.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
That's ok, Canada is in the same boat..... the only difference is that most of Canada already knows this half assed plan of Harpers' really won't do anything and it's nothing but chucking money into the fan blades.... the chances of this budget working is practically zero.

At least you guys have better odds.

I could not have said it better...

I have that feeling for our package as well...

But I hope we are so wrong... I really do.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
You can't dig your way out of a whole in a few months that was 8 yrs in the making

hole...:-?

Nobody said a few months... but he did run on the platform that he could fix the mess we are in. I just don't see how 850 BILLION in pork is going to stimulate the economy.
 

Tyr

Council Member
Nov 27, 2008
2,152
14
38
Sitting at my laptop
hole...:-?

Nobody said a few months... but he did run on the platform that he could fix the mess we are in. I just don't see how 850 BILLION in pork is going to stimulate the economy.

It's supply cash flow to the economy. Is it useful in the long term? Not that much. Remember the "Bridge to Nowhere" and other such boondoggles.

It just injects cash into the economic model and in strict financial terms is irresponsible

It's objective is to allay fears and get votes