A boycott would be staying at home. Here you are actively voting non-status-quo.Boycotts don't work and never have. People won't waste their time going to a polling station for nothing.
A boycott would be staying at home. Here you are actively voting non-status-quo.Boycotts don't work and never have. People won't waste their time going to a polling station for nothing.
People won't waste their time driving to a polling station to not vote.A boycott would be staying at home. Here you are actively voting non-status-quo.
A blank vote is counted like all the others, it is a valid 'none of the above' vote. Much better than not voting.
No it is counted as a rejected ballot. There were about 100,000 last election as reported. Well essentially we are, we are saying a rejected ballot is a perfectly valid none of the above vote.
Interesting...very interesting...
Someone seems to need to ask questions to gain an idea of someone elses position here, but when asked questions for the same reason elsewhere, he fails to live up to the challenge...
Very interesting indeed.
Transparent is an excellent word to describe some people.
Yes, you are transparent.yes, I am glad you brought this up, because this thread is a perfect example of transparancy.
That's Cannibal Troll, with a PhD in Asshology.CDNBear, your style is not the same, you are denying any objections and insisting on answers, and prepared to create/establish your own conclusions based on the absense of an answer. You sir, are a classic example of a troll.
A blank vote is counted like all the others, it is a valid 'none of the above' vote. Much better than not voting.
A boycott would be staying at home. Here you are actively voting non-status-quo.
So the great canadian blank ballot project is about a campaign towards getting a 'none of the above' option placed on the ballot? Well, i can respect that. But what if you are successful? What if the majority of voters vote 'none of the above'? Who gets to govern while the parties go back to a leadership campaign? Do we force all candidates to resign? Or just the ones that had a real chance of winning? What if voters never vote a party in? Can we forcce the existing gov out of power to replace them? Who would replace them? A coalition of the same losers that noone voted for?
Do we really want the 40 percent apathetic non-voters to come back to democracy if the only thing they can offer is negativity?