Geology

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
he Eye of the Storm, Part 1
By Andrew Hallhttp://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2019/03/31/the-eye-of-the-storm-part-1/


Earth’s geology and weather is a result of capacitance in Earth’s electric circuit. Forget anything you’ve been taught about geology. It’s wrong — provably wrong — from evidence you will soon see.
We are taught to associate geology with billions of years of “tectonic forces” is actually the result of capacitor discharge across Earth’s crust and atmosphere. The Earth’s own electric circuit electroplated, etched, and arced to form the land, patterned by the Earth’s electric field.
The first evidence of Earth’s electrical formation is provided by the landscape — all you need do is look at it. In this series of articles, you will be shown features created by electric winds. The challenge is to believe your eyes and take a serious look at the theory behind it.
The following images are just teasers. An explanation and even more dramatic evidence will take some explaining — several articles, in fact. But first, look at these basin and range mountains and contemplate what caused them.
They look as if a blowtorch blasted the land, don’t they? They are coherent flow patterns formed in concentric waves — exactly what a blowtorch would do. Just look.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
So earth's belly-button is an 'outee' rather than than an 'inee'?
An ozone hole would be created by what forces if lightening at very high altitudes is needed and the 'life' is only an hour long. A 'hole' over the poles would mean you get little lightening in cold dry air, that isn't rocket science. Are circular windstorms created as an 'outlet' or do the winds tend to wind something up, not always a happy ending when that happens.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Anything I knew about geology is long forgotten. Are you talking about rocks?
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
ABSTRACT
Multi-parametric Earthquake Forecastingthe New MadridFromElectromagnetic Coupling between Solar Corona and Earth SystemPrecursorsDisclosure: A condensed6-pageversion of this paper is currently under reviewwith The13thInternational Multi-Conference on Society, Cybernetics and Informatics: IMSCI Orlando 6 9 July, 2019.byBruce Leybourne, Ms., IEVPC CEO, Sebastian, Florida, USAValentino Straser,Department of Science and Environment, UPKL BrusselsHong-Chun Wu, Institute of Labor Occupational Safety and Health, Formosa Scientific Center, TaiwanGiovanni Gregori, PhD., Professor, Istituto di Acustica e Sensoristica O. M.Corbino(INM-CNR), Roma, ItalyArun Bapat, PhD. Former Head Earthquake Engineering -Central Water and Power Research Station (CWPRS), Pune, IndiaNatarajan Venkatanathan, PhD., Electrical and Electronics Engineering,SASTRA University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, IndiaLouis Hissink, IEVPC Research Director, NCGT Journal Chief Editor, NSW, AustraliaAcknowledgement: In recognition of Dr. Dong Choi’s tenacious research as past Director of InternationalEarthquake and Volcano Prediction Center (IEVPC) and from his persistent efforts as Chief Editor of New Concepts in Global Tectonics (NCGT) Journal toward the goals of this paper we honor his memoryby including him as an honorary Co-Author posthumously.ABSTRACTForecasting large earthquakes M 6.0 with satellite monitoring and Radio Direction Finding (RDF) techniques of Electro-Magnetic (EM)precursors associated with earthquakes are possible. ResearcheswithInternationalEarthquakeandVolcanoPredictionCenter(IEVPC -www.ievpc.org) haveuncoveredphenomena driving earthquakes that should be considered in a framework of strong global EM coupling between solar corona and the entire Earth system, throughEM induction drivingionosphere-air-earth currents. Catastrophic earthquakes have repeatedly stricken the New Madrid Seismic Zone during the last 4 major solar hibernation cycles since 1400 AD. Research suggests it is reasonableto expect another cycle of strongmagnitude6.0to 8.0 earthquakes in the New Madrid region during the upcoming, solar hibernation or solar minimum period starting around 2020. Possibly it’s already begun as evidenced by very little Sunspot activity. Large earthquakes generally occur early in thelower part of the cycle.The 181112 earthquakes, occurred in the midst of Dalton Solar Minimum (1793-1830), causingmany types of ground failures includinglateral spreading and ground subsidence by soil liquefaction across the Mississippi River flood plain and tributaries at least 15,000 square kilometers. The Mississippi River changed course in several places. Studies by the United States Geological Survey (USGS),and damage assessments by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA),estimate damages to infrastructure approaching$600 billion of damage.Understanding thecommon denominators between seismic precursors associated with a solar EM driver should be of concern. Analyzingdata on ionization phenomena in areas under tectonic stress such as: Outgoing Long-wave Radiation (OLR); Total Electron Content (TEC); atmospheric effects, such as Jet Stream and other meteorological phenomena related to earthquake clouds and lightsis necessary. IEVPC case studies show many M 6.0 earthquakesseismic locations were identified with Jet Stream precursorsthat interruptvelocity flow-lines crossingabove the earthquake epicenter 170 days prior to the eventlasting 612 hoursat 100 km distance fromJet Stream’s precursor. Maximum local temperatures within the potential earthquake zones becomehigher than normal by 5-7°C, gradually increasing over few days. Arise in the range of 7-12°C or more may indicate imminent earthquakes3-4 days beforehand. High regional OLR and TECvaluesindicatepossible earthquakes. Radio broadcasting may go tohigher frequencies, while landlines and inflight communications can be disturbed within the epicenter area 3-4 days beforehand, television broadcast within 15 hours of an event. While mobile phones within 30-40 km of an event may become non-functional within 100 minutes of an event. Global seismological archives indicate 3-4 weeks before large M ≥ 8.0earthquakes, dry wells, rivulets, and brooks may be flooded with oozing ground water. These innovative research and observational techniques for detectingEM and geomagnetic seismic precursors have rarely been implemented,as earthquakes are simplistically considered the result of grinding plate motions, and their true EM nature (solar EM induction triggering lightning from below) has been ignored. Crustalemission of radio waves (detected with RDF) at very low frequency in the band above 20kHzmanifests about 20 hours before an earthquake within the epicenter area. By combining RDF information of appropriately spaced antennae array stations (of some tens of km) one can locate the source of EM emission by triangulation discriminatingsource direction, position, and distance from the station, providingdata on the temporal variation of frequency, magnitude, and source intensity. Many of themethods above have been individually verified as valid for earthquake forecasting. See: http://www.ievpc.org/earthquake-papers.html.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Anything I knew about geology is long forgotten. Are you talking about rocks?


Yes ,but most of all about hot rocks squirted out of the earth by streams of electrical current.

 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Anything I knew about geology is long forgotten. Are you talking about rocks?
How rocks ended up with a polarity that is part of an 'electric grid'.

The inner core would be iron and heavier metals in vapor form. Electrical sparks would keep it at that state, HV bolts about as wide as twisters in the US.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Yes ,but most of all about hot rocks squirted out of the earth by streams of electrical current.

What about if the crust is reacting to conditions that start where the outer-core and the lower mantle start interacting. Currents in the core would be like spinning magnets around a mother of all magnets.

The Great Lakes is iron rich, would the core dip the land due to a magnetic attraction as well as iron being heavier that sandstone?
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
So earth's belly-button is an 'outee' rather than than an 'inee'?
An ozone hole would be created by what forces if lightening at very high altitudes is needed and the 'life' is only an hour long. A 'hole' over the poles would mean you get little lightening in cold dry air, that isn't rocket science. Are circular windstorms created as an 'outlet' or do the winds tend to wind something up, not always a happy ending when that happens.



Donald Scott: Modeling Birkeland Currents, Part 1 | EU Workshop

Don Scott, author of Electric Sky, made two major presentations at the EU Workshop, Nov 14-16, 2014 in Phoenix, Arizona. The first detailed how “polar configurations” are formed in space. Lacking familiarity with electrical phenomena in plasma, astronomers typically list these Herbig-Haro objects as “poorly understood.” Don’s second talk will…
Continue reading
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
What about if the crust is reacting to conditions that start where the outer-core and the lower mantle start interacting. Currents in the core would be like spinning magnets around a mother of all magnets.

The Great Lakes is iron rich, would the core dip the land due to a magnetic attraction as well as iron being heavier that sandstone?








Earthquakes and Volcanoes

Stephen Smith November 27, 2015 picture of the day


Lightning erupts from the crater of Mount Shinmoedake on the island of Kyushu in Japan. © Reuters News Agency


Nov 27, 2015


Lightning discharges in the atmosphere are familiar, but what about the ones underground?
The electrical phenomenon we call lightning is not well understood. The most common interpretation involves the circulation of water vapor up and down through clouds in a process called convection. Water is heated by the Sun until it evaporates, rising into the air where it collects into clouds. The water vapor continues to rise higher and higher, finally cooling enough to condense back into liquid. Earth’s gravity then pulls it back to the surface where the cycle repeats.
According to consensus opinions, water droplets tend to collide during convection, knocking electrons off one another, creating a charge separation. Electrons accumulate in the lower portion of the cloud, where it acquires a negative charge. As the droplets that have lost an electron continue to rise, they carry a positive charge into the top of the cloud.
The regions of charge differential, or charge separation, cause an electric field to form between them, with a strength directly proportional to the amount of charge in the cloud. The electric field can become so powerful that it repels electrons in the Earth’s surface, forcing it to become positively charged. A conductive pathway between the two regions can initiate a lighting leader stroke that eventually connects with some positive streamer rising from the ground.
Such a process cannot explain volcanic lightning. Most planetary scientists assume that the cause is similar, but there is no experimental evidence to confirm the idea.
Over the last two hundred years of reporting, lightning has been seen in the ash clouds spewing from numerous volcanic eruptions. Gigantic branching displays were photographed during the Mt. Chaiten eruption in May of 2008. There were reports of ball lightning bigger than beach balls rolling along the ground when Mt. St. Helens erupted in 1981. Eyjafjallajökull produced flashes that lit up the sky for many kilometers.
Large “telluric currents” have been found circulating through Earth’s crust because our magnetic field induces current flow in conductive strata. Thousands of amperes flow beneath the surface, varying according to conductivity. Since the Sun can affect Earth’s magnetic field through geomagnetic storms, fluctuations in telluric currents can occur when there is an increase in sunspots or solar flares, because they create oscillations in the ionosphere.
Sometimes earthquakes can produce flashes of light and other luminous events, as well. Ball lightning has been reported accompanying earthquakes, as have bright, colorful cloud-like formations floating in the sky above the fractured strata. It is not surprising that glow discharges occur before and after earthquakes: compressing quartz creates a flow of electric current. That is one reason why radio noise can be detected coming from areas under extreme stress. Is that stress only due to compression?
Quartz reacts to stress by producing electricity, but when electric charge flows through quartz it vibrates with a frequency coincident with the watts of power supplied to it. In a previous Picture of the Day, our planet was compared to a capacitor, capable of being charged and discharged by external electric fields.
A capacitor stores electric charge. Capacitors are constructed of two conductors, or “plates,” separated by a dielectric insulator. Electric charge on one plate attracts an opposite charge to the other, resulting in an electric field between them. As the capacitor’s charge increases, its electric field increases, stressing the insulator’s ability to separate opposite charges. If a high enough potential grows between the two conductive plates, the dielectric insulator will fail and the capacitor will short circuit, suddenly releasing the stored energy.
It is that phenomenon that most likely contributes to atmospheric lightning discharges. Stored electrical energy in the clouds and in the ground overcome the atmosphere’s ability to keep the two charges separate, so they reach out to each other as “leader strokes.” When the two lightning leaders meet, a circuit between the clouds and the ground (or between one cloud and another) is completed and a burst of electric current flashes along the conductive pathway.
Since magma can be considered a form of liquid plasma, it can also conduct electricity. As the ionosphere is charged up by solar flares, opposite charge is attracted to subterranean magma. Electric currents in plasma pinch down into filaments and form double layers. Electromagnetic forces between current filaments and between double layers can cause sudden pressure variations.
If, as stated above, the charge differential between layers becomes too great, a double layer can explode, releasing all of its energy flow instantaneously. So, earthquakes can be considered a form of underground lightning. If there is a break in the strata, permitting magma to reach the surface, the arc discharge might connect to the outside and a lightning bolt will leap from the cone of a volcano.
If earthquakes are underground lightning bolts, then perhaps seismic waves are the thunderclaps. In that case, it seems likely that the majority of energy release during an earthquake is not from the fracturing and movement of rock strata, but is the result of electrical energy detonating within the matrix.
Stephen Smith
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Electric Earth

Jan 8, 2018 All celestial bodies exhibit electrical activity, including Earth. NASA launched the four Magnetospheric Multiscale Satellites on March 12, 2015. Their primary mission includes studying the magnetic field around Earth, especially what mainstream astrophysicists call “magnetic reconnection”. The theory states that electromagnetic fields can break, cross and then…
Continue reading
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
NASA has been reading to many of Enoch's visions of the universe.

With a compass capable of letting the needle move up and down as well as in a circle how many degrees does the core bend the needle?
Say the moon puked out most of its metal core, would it take a magnetic charge as it cooled and became a solid as it passed through the earth's magnetic field?

Magnetic north is where a rain of iron salted the natural rock, enough that it created a wobble due to magnetic forces rather than an impact knocked earth off its normal orbit without making it a pile of rubble that stays that way forever.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
What about if the crust is reacting to conditions that start where the outer-core and the lower mantle start interacting. Currents in the core would be like spinning magnets around a mother of all magnets.

The Great Lakes is iron rich, would the core dip the land due to a magnetic attraction as well as iron being heavier that sandstone?


That circuit you visualize does not originate on earth, you are living on a motor more than a generator, although there is some feedback,. Life does not originate at the center of this earth.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
In that case, it seems likely that the majority of energy release during an earthquake is not from the fracturing and movement of rock strata, but is the result of electrical energy detonating within the matrix.
This will eventually lead to the black-hole photo so bear with me. I was having a hard time trying to pick a starting point to his theory. I don't discount that electrical forces are at work and have been at work from 'the beginning'. That being said other forces have also been at work just as long. Static charges are caused by friction and what is not measured is the heat transfer that takes place during the build-up and the release of the stored charge. Amps overcoming resistance in its basic form. Where the amps end up also experiences a localized heating compared to the rest of the path.
Voids in the solidified parts of the crust have a few causes, an electrical charge is not on the short list and there is no long list. Rock of a certain density being pushed up so it occupies more volume has to fracture to do that. Magma and oceanic-rifts are the factors behind those voids and over time the voids will fill up with some liquid or gas rising from below or water seeping down from the surface.
Heat that escapes into space originates at the core. The magma part is said to have a few areas where density takes a 'leap' so lets assume there is a transfer of heat and that mass stays within those few layers. If there are going to be 'storms' that is the region that will have them.

Lightening at it's highest levels transfers heat to the coldness of space. The heat lost is replaced at the core and another cycle begins. Earth is in balance, Mars is cold and getting colder and Pluto is so cold the core is shrinking and that is affecting the crust as that bond cannot be broken on a global scale.


Rain clouds see water vapor get closer together as they cool, they are also moving faster than they are at sea level and at some point the friction has to add some heat to the parameters and at a certain point a static charge is introduced that is either positive or negative.
Winds (rising heat) keep the clouds up where they are rather than there is a lack of gravity.


The earth spins so at some point when the core starts to cool it will shrink and the shape will change. The equator will shrink and the poles might even move outwards so an egg shape is the shape at that time. One thing it will not do is collapse equally from all angles. The sun also has a metal core and when it shrinks the planets will move in closer and that force should create bulging at its polar regions.

If the Milky Way even rotates in the direction it is promoted there is an imbalance at the core and that would prevent a black hole as you need gravity to be equal from all sides. If light is affected by gravity (which it isn't) then there is no constant speed of light and we know nothing about space as we measure it using light having a constant speed.

Light from the sun is slowed down how much before it reaches us?

Light from the center of the galaxy is slowed down how much??

Light that passes another galaxy, and is not swallowed up, is sped up how much before it reaches us?
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Sounds like it is easier to do in the lab than in the wild using the actual core of any planet or sun, Really?? Apply voltage and you end up with something we commonly call 'a motor'.

Controlled motion for lack of a better term, uncontrolled motion with magnets, with or without electricity being involved, is going to leave a mark.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
The s Sun being the nearest power supply to the earth is itself animated by galactic currents.



Cosmic Electromagnetism

Sep 11, 2018 The Universe is not only in motion. Galactic evolution occurs because large-scale plasma discharges form coherent filaments that exhibit electrodynamic behavior. Since the Universe is an electrical system that is constantly charging and discharging, instead of a gravitational system that is constantly contracting and expanding, gravity is…
Continue reading
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Sounds like it is easier to do in the lab than in the wild using the actual core of any planet or sun, Really?? Apply voltage and you end up with something we commonly call 'a motor'.

Controlled motion for lack of a better term, uncontrolled motion with magnets, with or without electricity being involved, is going to leave a mark.





Bruce Leybourne: Geometry of Earth’s Endogenous Electrical Energy — Geophysical Evidence | EU2016

: Bruce Leybourne’s presentation will examine the geometries of Earth’s electrical stellar transformer circuits. Both statistical data and geometric correlations suggest geophysical relationships between lightning and earthquakes. The basic “Delta-Y” electrical circuit geometry of the tetrahedron “fire element” is expanded to a little known geometric form that unifies the five…
Continue reading
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Geomagnetic field

Posted on February 18, 2019 by Louis Hissink
The Earth’s magnetic poles, especially the north pole, are doing strange things. Get this straight – the geomagnetic field is NOT caused by an internal dynamo effect driven by unseen upper core turbulence. It’s BS.
H/T Thunderbolts,info
Previous posts here on the geomagnetic field are listed below.

https://lhcrazyworld.wordpress.com/2018/07/12/earth-rotation-physics/

https://lhcrazyworld.wordpress.com/2018/08/25/magnetic-reversals-again/

https://lhcrazyworld.wordpress.com/2018/10/24/shifting-poles/

https://lhcrazyworld.wordpress.com/2014/10/13/source-of-the-geomagnetic-field/

https://lhcrazyworld.wordpress.com/2015/09/08/geomagnetic-mysteries/

https://lhcrazyworld.wordpress.com/2016/01/02/earthly-birkeland-currents-and-the-geomagnetic-field/
Magnetic fields and electric currents are inseparable.
The incoming polar Birkeland currents and the geomagnetic field are inseparable, with neither existing before the other.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Geomagnetic Mysteries

Posted on September 8, 2015 by Louis Hissink
How interesting – we seem to have a paradoxical core inside the Earth. It is the core that is supposed to form the geomagnetic by the flow of heat through the liquid outer core helps slosh the molten iron generating a magnetic field. Except that more recent deliberations considered the possibility that the core conducts heat more readily than previously thought, resulting in less mixing in the outer core and a younger earth with a weak magnetic field, if any at all. This is contradicted by palaeomagnetic data showing a powerful geomagnetic field billions of years ago. (source).
Whoopsies. We have a paradox. The paradox lies entirely in the virtual world of super-computing and the modelling of the geomagnetic field via the geophysical ‘dynamo’ theory. This theory is based on an assumed rotational differential between the solid inner core and the liquid outer core and the (mis)application of the Coriolis effect. The field is complex because it appears to have 2 dipole structures and is also slowly drifting westwards. And the field also has a diurnal component of a 24 hour period.
The main driving force of the dynamo model is ancient heat fueled by left-over energy by cosmic collisions that slowly conducted outwards through the liquid outerlayers that surround the solid inner core ultimately providing convection that swirls the molten iron in the outer core and that behaves as a dynamo which, if operating in an existing magnetic field, here the solar magnetic field, induces an electric current that strengthens the pre-existing weka field. If heat flow increases by conduction rather than convection then the induced field becomes weaker and so too the geomagnetic field.
I suspect there is a lot of circular reasoning at work here, apart from the adoption of some brave assumptions based on biblical, or if one is a secular humanist, secular creationism. You know, the problem of starting with nothing and then figuring out what happened next; especially difficult if you don’t understand the process of thinking in the first place, since it as this process of thinking that created the paradox in the first place.
What amuses me is a comment attributed to a geophyscist at the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington, D.C., where he admits that “rising and falling conductivity predictions may seem like scientists running in circles”.
Not only running but also thinking in circles.
Mind you, when this dynamo model was first mooted in the early 20th century, we assumed a clock-work like universe where planets and suns behaved like billiard balls suspended in a vacuum obeying Newton’s Laws of motion. We did not know of the solar wind or plasma and Kristiaan Birkeland’s work with auroras was studiously ignored. So it is fair enough that the model was limited to what we knew scientifically at the time. But today is 2015 and we now know that the conductive earth is surrounded by a co-rotating torus of electrical charge known as the Van Allen Belts; so guess what might be producing the geomagnetic field – the known Van Allen belts, or the mysterious, paradoxical, invisible process inside the Earth only known to the geomathematicians and their computerised simulations?