Genocide, the British don’t want you to know about

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Genocide, the British don’t want you to know about – They systematically starved to death over 60 millions of Eastern Indians!

The chronic want of food and water, the lack of sanitation and medical help, the neglect of means of communication, the poverty of educational provision, the all-pervading spirit of depression that I have myself seen to prevail in our villages after over a hundred years of British rule make me despair of its beneficence. — Rabindranath Tagore
If the history of British rule in India were to be condensed to a single fact, it is this: there was no increase in India’s per-capita income from 1757 to 1947.[1]
Churchill, explaining why he defended the stockpiling of food within Britain, while millions died of starvation in Bengal, told his private secretary that “the Hindus were a foul race, protected by their mere pullulation from the doom that is their due.”[2]
June 27— During its 190 years of looting and pillaging, the Indian Subcontininent as a whole underwent at least two dozen major famines, which collectively killed millions of Indians throughout the length and breadth of the land. How many millions succumbed to the famines cannot be fully ascertained. However, colonial rulers’ official numbers indicate it could be 60 million deaths. In reality, it could be significantly higher.





ritish colonial analysts cited droughts as the cause of fallen agricultural production that led to these famines, but that is a lie. British rulers, fighting wars in Europe and elsewhere, and colonizing parts of Africa, were exporting grains from India to keep up their colonial conquests—while famines were raging. People in the famineaffected areas, resembling skeletons covered by skin only, were wandering around, huddling in corners and dying by the millions. The Satanic nature of these British rulers cannot be overstated.


More: https://fbreporter.org/2015/07/07/g...-to-death-over-60-millions-of-eastern-indians


Yup, them Brits were right proper shit heads...
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113
We've had this conversation before about this shite: it was the Japanese who were responsible for the Bengal famine, not the British.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
We've had this conversation before about this shite: it was the Japanese who were responsible for the Bengal famine, not the British.
Can't take responsibility for your shitty country, eh. The Brits were the barbarians throughout the colonies, which was why the Hawaiians cut off Cook's head.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113
Can't take responsibility for your shitty country, eh. The Brits were the barbarians throughout the colonies, which was why the Hawaiians cut off Cook's head.

Well it was the Japanese who were responsible for the Bengal famine.

As for Hawaii, why's it okay for the United States to rule that once sovereign nation wth its own monarchy but not the United Kingdom?

As for the United States, it wouldn't even exist were it not for the British Empire, as you well know.

For a Canadian or an American to complain about the existence of the British Empire is like a person complaining that their mother existed.
 
Last edited:

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Well it was the Japanese who were responsible for the Bengal famine.
As for Hawaii, why's it okay for the United States to rule that once sovereign nation wth its own monarchy but not the United Kingdom?
As for the United States, it wouldn't even exist were it not for the British Empire, as you well know.
For a Canadian or an American to complain about the existence of the British Empire is like a person complaining that their mother existed.
How about Canada's early reliance on the French Empire?
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
As for Hawaii, why's it okay for the United States to rule that once sovereign nation wth its own monarchy but not the United Kingdom?
The US took over from the British Empire and now their empire are the barbarians phuking up the rest of the world, all in the name of democracy... hahahaha. What a phuking joke the British and the Yankees are.... well they would be if they weren't so freaking dangerous.
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,845
2,729
113
New Brunswick
As for Hawaii, why's it okay for the United States to rule that once sovereign nation wth its own monarchy but not the United Kingdom?


It's not, which is why there's still Royal Loyalists in Hawai'i, and there's a desire to return to it someday.

As for the United States, it wouldn't even exist were it not for the British Empire, as you well know.

For a Canadian or an American to complain about the existence of the British Empire is like a person complaining that their mother existed.


We've been over this before. Canada and the USA existed before the Brits showed, just not as their current existence. The Natives lived here first, with occasional visits from various sailors from other nations of Europe (Vikings) and possibly other nations.

Then the Spanish came, and the French, then the Brits.

If Canada was to look to any nation as it's 'mother', it'd be, I think, France more than Britain. Britain is like the Step-Mother from hell that took over and treated us like the redheaded stepchild it didn't want. France tried to fend the Brits off, but lost as you know.


You really have issues with world history, don't you?
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
It's not, which is why there's still Royal Loyalists in Hawai'i, and there's a desire to return to it someday.
We've been over this before. Canada and the USA existed before the Brits showed, just not as their current existence. The Natives lived here first, with occasional visits from various sailors from other nations of Europe (Vikings) and possibly other nations.
Then the Spanish came, and the French, then the Brits.
If Canada was to look to any nation as it's 'mother', it'd be, I think, France more than Britain. Britain is like the Step-Mother from hell that took over and treated us like the redheaded stepchild it didn't want. France tried to fend the Brits off, but lost as you know.
You really have issues with world history, don't you?
Oh yes. Two imperial powers but France was the kind, benevolent type of empire.:roll:
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,845
2,729
113
New Brunswick
Oh yes. Two imperial powers but France was the kind, benevolent type of empire.:roll:


Did I say France was kind or benevolent? Absolutely not.


And they weren't.


They took advantage of what they had as long as they could. They did treat the Natives a little better, but not much and in the end it didn't matter anyway.


But Blackie likes to make things out to be like the Brits were awesome, kind, benevolent types more than any other nation, and they weren't.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113
"Mainly"? ... I wonder.
Have ever visited here?

You don't need to visit Canada to see it's mainly a product of the British Empire. It's obvious the world over and a fact of history and current circumstances.

Canada would not exist were it not for the British Empire, as would many other countries.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
You don't need to visit Canada to see it's mainly a product of the British Empire. It's obvious the world over and a fact of history and current circumstances.
Canada would not exist were it not for the British Empire, as would many other countries.
Our history is far,far more complex than that. Canada wouldn't exist if it weren't for the Iroquois Confederacy who defended it at a time when the were less than a thousand Redcoats West of Montreal and we were bring repeatedly invaded.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,161
9,435
113
Washington DC
The British Empire was, and remains, the most powerful empire the world has ever seen.

Blackshirt just can't handle that the capital and center of power of the British Empire is now Washington, DC.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113
The British Empire was, and remains, the most powerful empire the world has ever seen.
Blackshirt just can't handle that the capital and center of power of the British Empire is now Washington, DC.

So the USA is part of the British Empire?