What point? That I believe in racially-neutral wording in official motions, bills, and laws? Ah, I guess it takes a White suppremacist to understand me. It's such a lonely life being a White supremacist in Canada.
'Freedom and liberty' demonstration outnumbered by 'anti-fascist' demonstrators
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
What point? That I believe in racially-neutral wording in official motions, bills, and laws? Ah, I guess it takes a White suppremacist to understand me. It's such a lonely life being a White supremacist in Canada.
We already have laws that cover every Religion.
It's Atheists who have everything to lose.
You're making less sense by the post.
Removing a harmless redundancy is not worth compromising awareness.
What awareness? Are you saying you were not aware that Islamophobia was a problem until this motion was introduced? I was well aware of it. How weren't you?
Based on that logic, we should also include a separate motion against racism emphasizing blacks. And then later a separate one emphasizing Asians. And then later a separate one emphasizing First Nations, etc. just to make sure we bring awareness on each of them.
No, I'm not saying that at all. In fact, I have no idea how you would even make that logical connection, seeing as we have been talking about the necessity for the existence of term in the motion and not about the term prior the motion.
But, anyway, I can't help your self provocations.
Weren't you saying that I would not have been aware of the problem of Islamophbia had it not been mentioned explicitly in the text?
You said we needed to include wording that singled out Islamophobia from other prejudices to raise awareness. That implies that the only way to raise awareness is to write motions, bills and laws that use wording that singles out one group or other.
I neither said that the term needs to be singled out, nor that awareness explicitly comes from a motion.
Good lord, you need to take your stupid pills today.
Good lord, you need to take your stupid pills today.
People will get angry over anything these days.
Windsor police stop things from turning violent at opposing protests over Islamophobia motion | Windsor Star
Windsor police stop things from turning violent at opposing protests over Islamophobia motion | Windsor Star
Amazing insight.
None of those who feel fascists should be barred from ever giving their opinion would support the same for communists, or certainly for Islamists who think women are dogs who need to be beaten until they obey.
Given the pictures I saw in the paper of 'angry' and violent people at these demonstrations seem to show that the 'anti-fascists' uniform du jour included masks I think their anger is self-evident. The violent anger of the indignant, self-righteous leftist that anyone be permitted to make political or social statements they don't agree with.