Forbes: China transitions to Clean Energy while Trump waffles

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
The law of inverse squares works against us too. For example, Norway being small with a decent hydroelectric capacity can easily supply power to its population with it. From a pure generating perspective, Ontario or Quebec alone could power the entire country of Canada with their very emissions-free generation. But that's where the law of inverse squares comes in and ruins everything. Damn science.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
The law of inverse squares works against us too. For example, Norway being small with a decent hydroelectric capacity can easily supply power to its population with it. From a pure generating perspective, Ontario or Quebec alone could power the entire country of Canada with their very emissions-free generation. But that's where the law of inverse squares comes in and ruins everything. Damn science.

Hydro-electric is not entirely emission free but close. It is definitely far from green. Every dam creates a huge lake and destroys vast areas of land. That is why the environmentalists fight against it so much. They don't want petro, they don't want hydro, now they don't want wind....I'm beginning to think what they want is a return to the stone age before man discovered and learned to control fire. Or maybe they just want mankind to be extinct.
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
15,281
2,909
113
Toronto, ON
Hydro-electric is not entirely emission free but close. It is definitely far from green. Every dam creates a huge lake and destroys vast areas of land. That is why the environmentalists fight against it so much. They don't want petro, they don't want hydro, now they don't want wind....I'm beginning to think what they want is a return to the stone age before man discovered and learned to control fire. Or maybe they just want mankind to be extinct.

Fire generates CO2. Fire BAD.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Well, that sure explains the great blue berries after on blows through
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,593
8,166
113
B.C.
No, it's not more accurate. When you compare Canada to European countries for example, the comparison isn't fair because of our vast geographical size and relatively small population. When a ship arrives in port, say in Rostock, a truck can deliver those goods anywhere in Germany within a little over 24 hours, or less. But when ships arrive in Vancouver, you're looking at close to 24 hours just to get to Alberta. Vast distances in Canada account for a sizable percentage of our per capita emissions. Then you also need to take into account that we ARE an arctic nation with areas that also have very hot summers so heating and a/c are going to be contributing factors year round.
It's not like Canada has the highest per capita emissions for sh*ts and giggles, there's a sound and very valid reason for it. Take the population of any industrialized country with lower per capita emissions than ours and plop them into Canada and watch how quickly their per captia emissions increase simply by virtue of our geography and climate.
Add to the fact Canada's civil service is at least twice the size of Germany's allowing their governments to spend more per capita on green energy solutions without causing their major industries to lose competitive advantage .
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Leggo my Eggo


China Is Going All In On Clean Energy As The U.S. Waffles. How Is That Making America Great Again?

For months, the clean energy discussion in the U.S. has been dominated by two questions: First, will the new administration really turn its back on the climate and clean energy policies that have helped create a burgeoning American industry? And if it does, how serious a blow will that be for the sector—and the global transition to clean energy?

China just answered the second question. On January 5, Reuters reported that China’s National Energy Administration (NEA) had announced in the next three years alone, China will invest $361 billion in renewable power generation. The spending comes as the cost of building large-scale solar plants has dropped by as much as 40 percent since 2010. While the Trump administration talks about renewing an outdated love affair with coal and oil, China’s investment is poised to generate over 13 million jobs in the clean energy sector.

In other words, the global energy transition is going to be fine. Whether we’ll be fine remains to be seen. Because if President-elect Trump follows through on his campaign promise to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement, he won't just be turning a blind eye to the science of climate change, he'll be hurting American businesses.

Climate progress creates jobs, innovation and investment opportunities in the clean energy economy, and protections for clean air and natural resources provide guardrails for long-term business resilience. The momentum we’ve established also positions the U.S. as a leader in the global discourse on climate.

By shirking America’s responsibilities as the world’s leading innovator and second largest emitter, Trump and his cabinet would be ringing the dinner bell for China and the European Union to assume the global leadership role on climate and clean energy, with all the job growth and economic opportunities that go with it.

Forbes Welcome

Bonds' idiot .Leading inivator of bullshjt.Trump is not a story.
He makes good film, you build arround the raw material with the right cutters. My cat has more brain cells than I do.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Thats OK
people brains are wired in series and cat brains are wired in parrallel
...while some leftie troll brainus never see the light
:)