"Food mile" produce

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
I just read an article in this month's Readers' Digest, pointing out that consuming "food mile" produce isn't all it's cracked up to be as far as less wear and tear on the environment. For instance a hectare of land in California will produce 5-7 times the amount of strawberries as Ontario can produce on a hectare. It also points out things like transporting thousands of tons of produce by freight train is far more economical than transporting 50 lbs, a mile or two in your car. The article made good sense to me - your opinion please.
 

VanIsle

Always thinking
Nov 12, 2008
7,046
43
48
Here is a little different point of view JLM. Also - what about the freshness or quality of food you buy near your home in comparison to food delivered to the stores. Most fruit is picked green so that it's ripe by the time you consume it.

n intereting concept related to carbon footprints is that of "food miles" - the distance food travels from where it is grown to where it is ultimately purchased or consumed by the end user.

[SIZE=-1]How much of the food you will eat today will be locally produced? And how much will travel hundreds, if not thousands, of miles before it is delivered to your plate? [/SIZE]The more food miles that attach to a given food, the less sustainable and the less environmentally desirable that food is. The term food miles has become part of the vernacular among food system professionals when describing the farm to consumer pathways of food.
For example, for every calorie of carrot flown in from South Africa to Europe, 66 calories of fuel is spent - contributing sgnificantly to CO2 emissions [SUSTAIN, 2002].
Food production, distribution and consumption patterns have undergone a major transformation over the past 50 years. Retailers have continued to develop ever more extensive and sophisticated outlets and distribution systems and import an increasing volume of produce. Consumers have become used to convenient, comfortable shopping facilities, and a large range of quality produce. But the vast distances that food travels 'from plough to plate' makes it vulnarable to oil supply, inefficient on a per calorie basis, and unsustainable in the long run. Combined with fair trade systems, many of these problems can be overcome by develoing regional and local food systems that highlight and use local produce.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
If you get a chance V.I. read the article on p. 70 of the R.D. It explains a lot of what you mention.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
I just read an article in this month's Readers' Digest, pointing out that consuming "food mile" produce isn't all it's cracked up to be as far as less wear and tear on the environment. For instance a hectare of land in California will produce 5-7 times the amount of strawberries as Ontario can produce on a hectare. It also points out things like transporting thousands of tons of produce by freight train is far more economical than transporting 50 lbs, a mile or two in your car. The article made good sense to me - your opinion please.

Well for starters, I think you also should then consider the large amounts of water that California withdraws to feed North America it's out of season fruits and vegetables. They are facing huge problems moving forward. Billions of dollars on securing reliable sources of water, including expensive desalination plants. Also, in Ontario, you don't have to put pressure on already strained estuarine fish species to produce strawberries.

If you're already traveling in your vehicle, and you have local produce along the way, then there is very little extra environmental cost.

But perhaps most importantly, eating local provides greater shifts in socio-economic, and cultural as well as environmental parameters. When the consumer has closer connections to the producing system, the interests of the two are easier to meet in a satisfactory manner.

The local label certainly I think needs scrutiny. It's a powerful marketing tool, and as such shouldn't be abused. Abuse could damage worthwhile ventures as well as rip off customers.