I believe there's a country out there that does interviews with EVERY person that is going to be flying on plane.. no exceptions.
why not?
why not?
not the point. they want to prevent it.
these idiots out there might come up with something that the current security teams havent' thought of!
how do you know?
they might some day come up with a liquid that they can poor on themselves that could explode when the air from the plane fans come on! or when their body temperature goes up.
maybe they're suicide bombers who will drink something that is perfectly harmless to them but when mixed with a drink or alcohol served on the plane or food they eat will cause a reaction that blows them up and the plane with them!
if you sit back and say "if if if.." maybe you should be thinking "when when when..."!!
:-? What are you, High?
Yeah and there might be some day when my farts repair the Ozone..... there might be some day when the Amish take over the world.... There might be a day coming soon where Bananas grow a brain and tell us the meaning to life if we stop eating them.
![]()
they're supposed to be Plastic not glass.
I believe there's a country out there that does interviews with EVERY person that is going to be flying on plane.. no exceptions.
why not?
ok well, that's fine. just don't fly then..
And you're just the man to do it!![]()
Weren't you already complaining about people refusing to get scanned or searched slowing down air traffic and thus that's why they should suck it up or not fly?
Doing the above would slow things down even longer...... and an interview doesn't prove someone is a threat or not either and people would be rejected from flying not because of evidence or facts, but due to assumptions and opinions over how someone didn't look at you the right way or answer a question the way you wanted.
^ Yet another failure of an idea that would solve nothing.
That's why.
Sorry, that doesn't make you automatically win the argument..... nor do I remember any specific person dying and making you Dictator of the Skies.
it's a necessity for Security! there's a big difference here.
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both" - Ben Franklin
blah. typical American quote.
don't want to give up any freedoms at all, even if it just might make sense!
blah. typical American quote.
If it makes reasonable sense, sure.... but none of the above is reasonable in anyway.don't want to give up any freedoms at all, even if it just might make sense!
So is "it's a necessity for Security!"
If it makes reasonable sense, sure.... but none of the above is reasonable in anyway.
Notice how you're pretty well on the losing side of the argument and very few agree with your point of view?
yet, the vast majority of Americans agree with me.. so
I doubt that very, very much.
then perhaps you should check the news.
they know already that 75% of Americans think it's fine.
blah. typical American quote.
don't want to give up any freedoms at all, even if it just might make sense!
yet, the vast majority of Americans agree with me.. so
then perhaps you should check the news.
they know already that 75% of Americans think it's fine.