Re: RE: Fido vs. Telus/Clearn
at least, Rogers has EDGE and GPRS everywhere of their coverage since it's fully digital. Telus and Bell 's digital coverage are smaller than Rogers' digital coverage.
kalok~
nitzomoe said:Unfortunately only theoretically can EDGE have data rates of 384 kbits/s, in the real world it will be able to provide a slightly less data rate than CDMA 1X. the link below will inform you of how I came to that conclusion. Also by the time EDGE has been fully implemented, TELUS will be moving on from 1X to CDMA2000 1xEV-DV clearly into 3G territory, and though its theoretical rate limit is 3.1 mbps (Oliver Valante, CDMA Development Group) its real-world data rate will actually be more along the lines of 1 Mbps. Its relatively cheaper for TELUS to venture such a task as upgrading infrastructure as opposed to GSM, as SCAPE has duly noted to upgrade GSM into WCDMA requires brand new infrastructure, which ROGERS won't be undertaking for at least another 5/6 years. Again since EDGE hs yet to be fully realised, I may be wrong, but current experimentation as well as the opinions of individuals whose primary mode is to review such technology seem to lend their names to CDMA as superior technology, easier to maintain service and easier to upgrade to 3G.
(http://www.newmobilecomputing.com/story.php?news_id=3091)
at least, Rogers has EDGE and GPRS everywhere of their coverage since it's fully digital. Telus and Bell 's digital coverage are smaller than Rogers' digital coverage.
kalok~