Federal government pulls funding to successful treatment program for sex offenders
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
Either it was a dingbat or it was an "oops". So either way, a mistake. Just one is on a larger scale than the other. Lol
But can't you tell?
I think I'm about to be the second...lol I'm starving and I want a nap....2 coffees both tasted like tap water and they were Keurig so no way it was the coffee *yawn*
'course it could just be psychological because I am about to do my income tax and I already know that I owe
question is just how much...I am praying it is less than what I am fearing but I doubt it...contracts mess with the amount taken off at times...
Don't lose any sleep over it. You get those from low I.Q. types who have nothing of value to say...........just repeat themselves!
So why do you do it????? -
For the rep rollers, here's a video that accurately describes my thoughts on these pointless discussions:
As for the subject matter, the Criminal Justice system is not just about punishment. Maybe people only think of health care as a cure, but preventing something in the first place is often cheaper than paying for the consequences afterwards.
What does it cost typically to confine someone convicted of a sex crime? For the high risk offenders, if the recidivism drops by 75%, then that is a pretty significant cost savings.
But far more important, it's stopping crimes from occurring. It's far more important that a program like this can prevent future victims of sex crimes.
As for the subject matter, the Criminal Justice system is not just about punishment. Maybe people only think of health care as a cure, but preventing something in the first place is often cheaper than paying for the consequences afterwards.
What does it cost typically to confine someone convicted of a sex crime? For the high risk offenders, if the recidivism drops by 75%, then that is a pretty significant cost savings.
But far more important, it's stopping crimes from occurring. It's far more important that a program like this can prevent future victims of sex crimes.
Really? That's fec kin funny.
I think if you haven't gotten a reddie from Cannuckie then you're either dead or you're doing something wrong in this here forum.
Really? That's fec kin funny.
I think if you haven't gotten a reddie from Cannuckie then you're either dead or you're doing something wrong in this here forum.
Don't be so silly. there are far...far more regulars here that have never received a reddie from me. I only hand them out from stupid, silly or childish comment. If youre getting your fair share from me, well....
Bump.For the rep rollers, here's a video that accurately describes my thoughts on these pointless discussions:
As for the subject matter, the Criminal Justice system is not just about punishment. Maybe people only think of health care as a cure, but preventing something in the first place is often cheaper than paying for the consequences afterwards.
What does it cost typically to confine someone convicted of a sex crime? For the high risk offenders, if the recidivism drops by 75%, then that is a pretty significant cost savings.
But far more important, it's stopping crimes from occurring. It's far more important that a program like this can prevent future victims of sex crimes.
Not worth ....
" I only hand them out from stupid, silly or childish comment."
Is not the repetition of the same remark ad infinitum included in "stupid, silly or childish" or perhaps all three? Or is it that only one poster on the forum is allowed to be stupid, silly or childish while the rest of us have to toe the line.? -
Is not the repetition of the same remark ad infinitum included in "stupid, silly or childish" or perhaps all three? Or is it that only one poster on the forum is allowed to be stupid, silly or childish while the rest of us have to toe the line.? -
Unfortunately Sal, we live in the present. Lets hope we do know how to treat them someday, as we can't warehouse them all (apparently). You're absolutely right re sexual assault, rape, castration.
Leave it to the jackbooters to defund something which might have positive results...........in the future.
They defunded a program that was having positive results in the present. Not just some possible airy fairy future results.
It's almost as if they want recidivism rates to go up so they can justify their "tough on crime" stance.
" I only hand them out from stupid, silly or childish comment."
Is not the repetition of the same remark ad infinitum included in "stupid, silly or childish" or perhaps all three? Or is it that only one poster on the forum is allowed to be stupid, silly or childish while the rest of us have to toe the line.? -
Is that an attempt at adding something to the discussion or are you just trolling?