Fake CNN video on 9-11
- Thread starter Logic 7
- Start date
Climb a flight of stairs and you'll see buildings "change height" the same way. I'm not saying there aren't some questionable things about 911 (like why did an airplane "crash" in Pennsylvania a half hour after all US airspace was supposed to be empty, and why was that the only one that had a bomb on board while the other three were being hijacked with boxcutters?) but continuous sensationalization of faked/unfaked multiple images only serves to damage the credibility of real proof.
Wolf
Edit: Where'd the damned pic go?
Last edited:
As far as the plane that went down in Shanksville PA... hijackers do not tend to listen to FAA rules or instructions when they are... well... hijacking. Also the hijackers on that flight did use box cutters but also said they had a bomb but it does not mean they had a real bomb.
And you were countered with "prove yourself right or shut up", instead you keep posting hearsay like its truth.
You are really far gone, you are so sure of yourself you can't even entertain the possiblity that your wrong. What you have is a nice theory, if you have proof. Take it, and file a lawsuit. If you don't have enough proof for that..
Guess what, you don't have proof, so zip it mister.
Agreed. In times of overwhelming emotion, there are bound to be acts of bravery and fear. There will be confusion and difficult decisions to make. At times like those, we most need heroes.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=30682
Around 11:00 on 911, I recall hearing unconfirmed news of an airliner being brought down by fighters in Pennsylvania (would explain some reports of Flight 93's "inverted and in flames" fall to earth) The 11:00 news that night reported of only one aircraft intercepted and forced to land - a KAL 747 at Yellowknife NWT by UASF F-16's and CAF CF-18's. Therein lives my question....
Wolf
Last edited:
Not even a single time on this thread, no one has proven me wrong that cnn shot were real ,whatever i think which theory it is, it just doesnt matter, it was an inside job, but how exactly , i don't know.
Prove me that the cnn shot was real, i brought many pictures and videos from mulitiple site(which some are not by the way link to any conspiracy whatever you can call it) or just shut up, you didnt even bring anything in this thread other than just blatering like a teenager.
Since New york, is the most documented city on the internet, it would have been so easy to prove that cnn shot were real, but none of here was able to do it, quite laughable, to see you all in here blatering the same thing since post 1 of this thread, get real, and it is about time.
So not the kookamunga stick then?
Was it Mrs white in the conservatory with the wrench?
:idea: Didn't the building have glass walls, therefore the answer would be all of them:lol:
Why? you haven't proven your shot was real. You can't prove a negative Logic.
So, how about you quit crying, and prove the shots you are showing are real. If you think you have and we don't understand, go to the cops.
Go on, we'll wait, we'll see you on TV after blowing the case wide open.
We are waiting, if you have proof, use it. If its proof it proves without a doubt what you are trying to show. If not, then it isn't proof.
So shut it.
I've brought many videos and photos to prove that cnn shot was fake, when you have only the cnn shot to prove your point, then, it is time for you to bring other video or photo that will support that the cnn shot was real, go on, i will be waiting for a long time.
IF those videos are true. You have to prove those videos show anything, if not, then please, allow me to show you this REAL TRANSCRIPT.
"Ya, I made those videos for youtube, totally fake. I used software to alter the shot to create fake evidence CNN was involved in a hoax, the shots are totally fake".
OMG! Blown wide open logic7! It looks like my shady and unproven "Real Transcript" beats the pants off your shady and unproven youtube videos.
OR do you have some proof those youtube videos really show what you think they do.
But the statement stands, if you have real proof. Go to the cops or at least go take a civil lawsuit to CNN. But you don't, you have videos you can't prove are real, that don't prove what you think they do.
"Ya, I made those videos for youtube, totally fake. I used software to alter the shot to create fake evidence CNN was involved in a hoax, the shots are totally fake".
OMG! Blown wide open logic7! It looks like my shady and unproven "Real Transcript" beats the pants off your shady and unproven youtube videos.
OR do you have some proof those youtube videos really show what you think they do.
But the statement stands, if you have real proof. Go to the cops or at least go take a civil lawsuit to CNN. But you don't, you have videos you can't prove are real, that don't prove what you think they do.
Here is again.
Show me where is the building that is supposed to be higher than the plane(besides both wtc)?
Now this is the cnn shot.
quite funny isnt?
Whew... it's been awhile since I have come to this thread.
So what are you saying now Logic? Are you saying that planes didn't hit the WTC? :lol:
So what are you saying now Logic? Are you saying that planes didn't hit the WTC? :lol: