"Explosive", "Shocking" And "Alarming" FISA Memo Rocks DC "End Mueller Investigation"

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Re: "Explosive", "Shocking" And "Alarming" FISA Memo Rocks DC "End Mueller Investigat

Sorry doood, you were stunned before you ever got to this thread.
;)
Have you ever thought about untying the one tied around your neck? It appears to be cutting off the blood flow to your head. Or have you noticed it doesn't matter?
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Re: "Explosive", "Shocking" And "Alarming" FISA Memo Rocks DC "End Mueller Investigat

Yes, you were staggering before you ever got to this thread, at first we thought it was booze...now we see that it's permanent.
;)
I mean jeez, I see that you thought you were typing an intelligent response, but look what actually came out instead.

FURTHER (from the above link ) :

The probe started in the summer of 2016 by the FBI, and was taken over by Mueller nearly a year ago. Despite a large, secret budget and a squad of seasoned gunners, many of them Clinton supporters, Mueller hasn’t produced any evidence of a crime by the president.

There cannuck, I wrote that to match the color of the veins in your eyeballs.
 
Last edited:

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Re: "Explosive", "Shocking" And "Alarming" FISA Memo Rocks DC "End Mueller Investigat

I'll bet most of your bathroom accomplishments are. Now there, it's past your bedtime, it's almost noon.


Russian lawyer questions why Mueller hasn’t contacted her

In an interview with The Associated Press, Natalia Veselnitskaya also detailed her recent meeting in Berlin with investigators from the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee. Like Mueller, the committee is investigating allegations of Russian interference in the U.S. presidential election.

Veselnitskaya met in June 2016 with then-candidate Donald Trump’s son, his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort, his campaign chairman at the time, Paul Manafort, after Trump Jr. was told the Russian lawyer had potentially incriminating information about Hillary Clinton.

Mueller, a former FBI director, is leading a federal probe of possible collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. He has filed charges against multiple former Trump campaign aides.

Veselnitskaya alleged in her interview with the AP in downtown Moscow that if Mueller’s team never questions her, it would mean that it “is not working to discover the truth.”
https://apnews.com/b9657a2a41184b72...er-questions-why-Mueller-hasn't-contacted-her

The only time the democrats will NOT collude with russians is when it means the TRUTH might come out.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Re: "Explosive", "Shocking" And "Alarming" FISA Memo Rocks DC "End Mueller Investigat

I'll bet most of your bathroom accomplishments are. Now there, it's past your bedtime, it's almost noon.


Russian lawyer questions why Mueller hasn’t contacted her

In an interview with The Associated Press, Natalia Veselnitskaya also detailed her recent meeting in Berlin with investigators from the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee. Like Mueller, the committee is investigating allegations of Russian interference in the U.S. presidential election.

Veselnitskaya met in June 2016 with then-candidate Donald Trump’s son, his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort, his campaign chairman at the time, Paul Manafort, after Trump Jr. was told the Russian lawyer had potentially incriminating information about Hillary Clinton.

Mueller, a former FBI director, is leading a federal probe of possible collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. He has filed charges against multiple former Trump campaign aides.

Veselnitskaya alleged in her interview with the AP in downtown Moscow that if Mueller’s team never questions her, it would mean that it “is not working to discover the truth.”

Russian lawyers have a say in this, do they? Tell your masters in Moscow to mind their own business.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Re: "Explosive", "Shocking" And "Alarming" FISA Memo Rocks DC "End Mueller Investigat

thnx for the bmp
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
Re: "Explosive", "Shocking" And "Alarming" FISA Memo Rocks DC "End Mueller Investigat

I'll bet most of your bathroom accomplishments are. Now there, it's past your bedtime, it's almost noon.


Russian lawyer questions why Mueller hasn’t contacted her

In an interview with The Associated Press, Natalia Veselnitskaya also detailed her recent meeting in Berlin with investigators from the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee. Like Mueller, the committee is investigating allegations of Russian interference in the U.S. presidential election.

Veselnitskaya met in June 2016 with then-candidate Donald Trump’s son, his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort, his campaign chairman at the time, Paul Manafort, after Trump Jr. was told the Russian lawyer had potentially incriminating information about Hillary Clinton.

Mueller, a former FBI director, is leading a federal probe of possible collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. He has filed charges against multiple former Trump campaign aides.

Veselnitskaya alleged in her interview with the AP in downtown Moscow that if Mueller’s team never questions her, it would mean that it “is not working to discover the truth.”
https://apnews.com/b9657a2a41184b72...er-questions-why-Mueller-hasn't-contacted-her

The only time the democrats will NOT collude with russians is when it means the TRUTH might come out.


Yeah, right. Because Russians never lie.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
Re: "Explosive", "Shocking" And "Alarming" FISA Memo Rocks DC "End Mueller Investigat

This entire file just keeps getting the Dems deeper and deeper in the hole

Yeah right because Mueller has arrested numerous Democrats. Where the hell do you get your news, National Enquirer?
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,501
8,102
113
B.C.
Re: "Explosive", "Shocking" And "Alarming" FISA Memo Rocks DC "End Mueller Investigat

Yeah right because Mueller has arrested numerous Democrats. Where the hell do you get your news, National Enquirer?
Things you will never see on CNN or CBC .
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Re: "Explosive", "Shocking" And "Alarming" FISA Memo Rocks DC "End Mueller Investigat

LOL, so that's where you get your news...you should try it in english some time.

Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee says no official intelligence was used to start the Trump-Russia collusion investigation.

[youtube]Bl5x9Yh90X0[/youtube]

At least you liebarrels came across your name honestly.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Re: "Explosive", "Shocking" And "Alarming" FISA Memo Rocks DC "End Mueller Investigat

 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Re: "Explosive", "Shocking" And "Alarming" FISA Memo Rocks DC "End Mueller Investigat

If you get your news from Facebook, knowing what we know now about how they manipulate weak minds, what does that make you cliffie?

You know there were some christian democrats too, but they were sucked up into the sky during the carter administration. A sand storm some said.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Re: "Explosive", "Shocking" And "Alarming" FISA Memo Rocks DC "End Mueller Investigat

If you get your news from Facebook, knowing what we know now about how they manipulate weak minds, what does that make you cliffie?
It's from a spoof site. Grab a sense of humour. Oh, I forgot, conservatives don't have a sense of humour.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Re: "Explosive", "Shocking" And "Alarming" FISA Memo Rocks DC "End Mueller Investigat

Fair enough Cliffie, many of your memes appear to be dead serious...and wrong as this shows:

House GOP ending Russia probe, says no collusion found

The House Intelligence Committee is shutting down its contentious investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, the top Republican leading the probe announced on Monday.

The committee will interview no more witnesses and Republicans are in the process of preparing their final report, Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas) told reporters. A draft of that roughly 150-page report will be delivered to committee Democrats for review on Tuesday.

ADVERTISEMENT
The draft document asserts that there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians, the most politically charged question examined by the committee.
It will also contradict an official U.S. intelligence community assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin showed a “preference” for Donald Trump during the race — another assertion that Trump has disputed.

“We found no evidence of collusion,” Conaway said Monday. “We found perhaps some bad judgment, inappropriate meetings, inappropriate judgment in taking meetings — but only Tom Clancy could take this series of inadvertent contacts, meetings, whatever, and weave that into some sort of a spy thriller that could go out there.”

Further, he said, “we couldn’t establish the same conclusion that the CIA did that [the Russians] specifically wanted to help Trump.”

Trump applauded the committee's findings on Twitter:


The announcement is unlikely to herald any bipartisan conclusion to the central questions in an investigation that for more than a year has been mired in investigatory offshoots, leaks and bitter fighting between committee members.

The top Democrat on the panel, Rep. Adam Schiff (Calif.), in a blistering statement called the end of the probe a "tragic milestone" and a "capitulation to the executive branch."

"By ending its oversight role in the only authorized investigation in the House, the Majority has placed the interests of protecting the President over protecting the country, and history will judge its actions harshly," Schiff wrote.

Schiff in his statement emphatically rejected the GOP's assertion that the Russians did not seek to help Trump's campaign, saying the evidence "is clear and overwhelming that the Intelligence Community Assessment was correct."

"If the Russians do have leverage over the President of the United States, the Majority has simply decided it would rather not know," he said.

Republicans have said for months that they were ready to wind down the investigation, having found no evidence of collusion. Democrats paint a different picture, warning that Republicans are protecting the president by failing to conduct a serious investigation.

Conaway said Monday that he expects Democrats to make “extensive changes” to the draft report Republicans will deliver on Tuesday. Lawmakers from both parties have long said that Democrats would likely issue their own report.

The GOP report will confirm a broad-based Russian active measures campaign designed to sow discord during the 2016 presidential race, as well as a “lackluster” pre-election response to that campaign.

It will also include “how anti-Trump research made its way from Russian sources to the [Hillary] Clinton campaign,” an apparent reference to the controversial dossier of opposition research on Trump compiled in part by former British spy Christopher Steele, who was hired by the research firm Fusion GPS.

“We will say that there was an attempt to use foreign sources with respect to the Clinton campaign,” Conaway said.

“It was clear that there was — at least Steele and however much he talked and didn’t talk to Russians — that’s foreigners and that information was paid for by the [Democratic National Committee] and the Clinton campaign,” Conaway said, adding, “I don’t have any direct evidence that they knew about it.”

The GOP report will also include a section covering what the committee believes were criminal leaks related to the dossier, though Conaway said the committee lacked the evidence to make a criminal referral to the Justice Department.

The draft report also includes recommendations for both Congress and the executive branch, centered on election security, government response to cyberattacks and support to European allies.

The investigation, launched in January 2017, is coming to a close after lawmakers reviewed more than 300,000 documents and interviewed 73 witnesses, including former White House chief strategist Stephen Bannon, Donald Trump Jr. and Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser Jared Kushner.

As initially conceived, the probe was tasked with four investigatory pillars, including the Russian interference effort, the government’s response to that campaign, leaks of classified information related to those matters and any ties between Russia and “individuals associated with political campaigns.”

Despite regular outbreaks of internecine fighting, the investigation has produced one of the most significant public developments in the Russia saga to date: It was at a public committee hearing that then-FBI Director James Comey revealed that the bureau was investigating the matter.

It was also the genesis of an ongoing GOP investigation, spearheaded by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), into what some House Republicans say were gross abuses of U.S. surveillance authorities.

In a dramatic moment, Nunes stepped back from leading the investigation amidst a now-closed Ethics Committee investigation into whether he revealed classified information during an impromptu press conference last spring.

It was then that Conaway took over the investigation, though Democrats have complained that Nunes continued to assert his authority behind the scenes. Nunes has insisted the Ethics investigation, which cleared him of any wrongdoing, was a political sham.

Relations on the panel were further rocked earlier this year when committee Republicans forced the publication of a formerly classified memo prepared by Nunes’s staff alleging surveillance abuses, over the objections of both Democrats and the FBI.

Although Democrats were later permitted to release their own countermemo, they have since called on Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) to remove Nunes from his post as chairman.

Committee Republicans have said the investigations into surveillance abuses are separate from the Russia probe. Those reviews are ongoing, Conaway said Monday.

The panel has also been split by disputes over subpoenaing witnesses. Democrats have complained that Republicans have allowed witnesses to set the parameters of their testimony at the behest of the White House, a characterization disputed by Conaway on Monday.

“Broad statement, you use subpoenas when you think you can actually get something from them, and we’re not particularly confident that the subpoena process will get us any more than we had,” he said. “We also think we have the evidence we need to come to the conclusions we’ve come to.”

The committee will not pursue steps to enforce the subpoena of Bannon, who frustrated both Republicans and Democrats by refusing to answer questions outside of the 25 scripted by the White House during a pair of interviews this year.

The raucous investigation in the House has been dramatically different from a parallel probe underway in the Senate Intelligence Committee, which has largely kept its work under wraps and whose leaders have presented a united front.

The Senate panel’s work is ongoing. Its first product, a report on election security, is expected to be released in the coming weeks.

Conaway on Monday declined to set a timeline for the public release of the House report, which must first be sent back to the intelligence community to be scrubbed for classified information.

He said the report would not be shared with the Senate Intelligence Committee before publication.
http://thehill.com/policy/national-...p-ending-russia-probe-says-no-collusion-found

POOR TRUMPHATERS...THEY HATE AMERICA FOR IT'S FREEDOMS!!!...NO COUP FOR YOUP!!!!
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
Re: "Explosive", "Shocking" And "Alarming" FISA Memo Rocks DC "End Mueller Investigat

Fair enough Cliffie, many of your memes appear to be dead serious...and wrong as this shows:

House GOP ending Russia probe, says no collusion found

Why don't you stick to quoting Hannity? He is such a reliable source.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Re: "Explosive", "Shocking" And "Alarming" FISA Memo Rocks DC "End Mueller Investigat

THE ‘RUSSIAN COLLUSION’ TRIAL IS ON, AND MUELLER MAY BE THE FIRST CASUALTY
Indicted Russian company calls Mueller’s bluff

Lawyers for Russian company Concord Management and Consulting, LLC, formally entered a “not guilty” plea in federal court Monday in a case special counsel Robert Mueller probably never thought would happen.

Mueller, weathering significant criticism that his Russian collusion case was thin, unveiled a grandiose indictment Feb. 16 against 13 Russian nationals and three Russian companies. The 13 Russians in question were charged with waging “information warfare” in the United States, interfering with the 2016 presidential election, and conspiracy to defraud the United States.

Mueller generated headlines with the February indictment, safe in the knowledge the 13 Russians were beyond U.S. jurisdiction. Therefore, there would be no trial — only sensational Russian collusion accusations.
https://www.infowars.com/the-russian-collusion-trial-is-on-and-mueller-may-be-the-first-casualty/

ROBERT MUELLER SKIPS COURT AFTER INDICTED RUSSIANS SHOW UP AND PLEAD NOT GUILTY
Russians call Mueller’s bluff

1800
A federal judge denied Mueller’s request to delay the court date, so he decided not to show up.
https://www.infowars.com/robert-mue...dicted-russians-show-up-and-plead-not-guilty/