Loc, don't you think some of the MSM's sensationalism is bit over the top? Levantish even?
some are...the ones that thrive on advertising and ratings most...that's why this stuff is important.
Loc, don't you think some of the MSM's sensationalism is bit over the top? Levantish even?
This Ebola is some concerning stuff. Dude on a plane from Africa to
Dallas and then a health care worker flies to Ohio and everyone in a
bridal shop she then visits....& and everyone she came into contact
with since her fever....& this one made the news. How many others
are on the QT?
My Girlfriend works for Canada Post. Mail (like money) is dirty at best.
Back when Anthrax was the popular panic of the day, we had a couple
of scares here locally (thankfully neither panned out) but still lead to
building lock downs and employee strip downs with their coworkers
in a naked group for multiple chemical showers, ect.....
Ebola can only exist outside of a host (like on a doorknob or a counter top)
for for several hours, however as a body fluid (like a licked envelop) it can
survive for several days at room temperature. Luckily winter is coming, I
guess.
Very interesting questions.some are...the ones that thrive on advertising and ratings most...that's why this stuff is important.
Very interesting questions.
We've learned during the past 50 years that vaccines are a temporary measure at best (sort of like raising the ocean level by pissing in it)
8O How do you figure that? A vaccine against small pox has been around since 1796, and there has been no small pox in any human population since 1979. How is that like pissing in the ocean?
Simple- Small pox is an anomaly. We managed to kill the disease right off before the vaccine lost its effect.
What other diseases have been eradicated?
Vaccine has lost it's effect? A temporary measure? That's the bit I'm zeroing in on. What are these comments based on? Tuberculosis vaccines introduced in 1921, nearly a century later they're still effective.
Small pox eradication didn't occur until 183 years after the vaccine came along...
In my field, the use of antibiotics has plummeted as vaccines have been introduced.
In order for a vaccine to lose it's effect, the organism in the field would have to mutate. A lot. Conversely, that's why some diseases like influenza are very difficult to make highly efficacious vaccines for. The virus mutates more quickly.
Certainly some organisms are better candidates than others for vaccines. But that is not to say that vaccines have become ineffective. The body of evidence against that claim is staggeringly large.
The cattle disease rinderpest. There are eradication campaigns in place for other diseases. Polio for example, which was actually dealt a huge blow by the CIA. They were impersonating WHO workers in Pakistan, one of the last countries where polio has a strong hold. They were doing this to find Bin Laden.
Mea culpa, I misspoke I meant to say antibiotics, thinking mainly of things like penicillin and others.
Ahh, well that's a whole other kettle of fish. Yes, they are losing effectiveness, and it's maddening to read some of this stuff. Duncan was sent home from that Dallas ER with a script for antibiotics...they had no confirmation of a bacterial infection, not even a probable diagnosis, yet they prescribe antibiotics.
The USA is particularly bad for this. While other countries, including Canada, have banned the sub-therapeutic use of antibiotics as growth promoters in livestock, the US stubbornly has not followed, even though we know that it's one of the largest pressures on producing antibiotic resistance. They instead choose to 'limit' the amount of antibiotics that are medically important to humans, used in livestock. They chose to phase them out over time. The Ag lobby argued that the economic implications of removing these uses could cost up to 5 cents more per pound for pork...In 1999 the EU banned sub-therapeutic use, and since then the prevalence of antibiotic resistance has gone down, without negative impacts on hog health.
You are the coolest egghead I know!!!Ahh, well that's a whole other kettle of fish. Yes, they are losing effectiveness, and it's maddening to read some of this stuff. Duncan was sent home from that Dallas ER with a script for antibiotics...they had no confirmation of a bacterial infection, not even a probable diagnosis, yet they prescribe antibiotics.
The USA is particularly bad for this. While other countries, including Canada, have banned the sub-therapeutic use of antibiotics as growth promoters in livestock, the US stubbornly has not followed, even though we know that it's one of the largest pressures on producing antibiotic resistance. They instead choose to 'limit' the amount of antibiotics that are medically important to humans, used in livestock. They chose to phase them out over time. The Ag lobby argued that the economic implications of removing these uses could cost up to 5 cents more per pound for pork...In 1999 the EU banned sub-therapeutic use, and since then the prevalence of antibiotic resistance has gone down, without negative impacts on hog health.
Ahh, well that's a whole other kettle of fish. Yes, they are losing effectiveness, and it's maddening to read some of this stuff. Duncan was sent home from that Dallas ER with a script for antibiotics...they had no confirmation of a bacterial infection, not even a probable diagnosis, yet they prescribe antibiotics.