Earths Expansion and Declining Seas

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
I just asked if it summed up what you already believe, I'm not trying to teach/show anything at the moment.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
116,106
13,858
113
Low Earth Orbit
I've watched the first 12 mins that have loaded so farand there was nothing new. It only confirms what I've been talking about.

MHz you are confusing sedimentary rock with sediment aka mud. Where was the new information that goes against previous knowledge of south western US dykes, sills, lava beds and cinder cones and how they were formed?
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
The words "most likely" are used quite often in that place of only 'hard facts'.
The facts are hard enough, the "most likely" qualifier is applied to explanations of what they mean. That's just the nature of science, and you'd know that too if you knew anything about science. For absolute certainty, science isn't what you want, all of its claims and conclusions are tentative to some degree.
The bad news is you didn't answer either question about what 25 miles of rock is capable of scrapping off or how old the crust is that is being subducted.
Bad news for you maybe. Most of your questions betray such a basic misunderstanding of science's data and theories it'd take far more time than I'm prepared to spend explaining them to you. You can look that up as well as I can, in fact I'm quite confident you think you already know the answers.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Just be patient MHZ the science will change like good science always does. What you are faced with here in this thread are the die hard fanatics of "yesterdays scientific speculation" remnants of already dead theories who just won't tip over and blow away along with the dust of old textbooks.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Just be patient MHZ the science will change like good science always does. What you are faced with here in this thread are the die hard fanatics of "yesterdays scientific speculation" remnants of already dead theories who just won't tip over and blow away along with the dust of old textbooks.
Two more to go, maybe they will have some sort of reply.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
... the science will change like good science always does.
You're right about that much at least, but the electric cosmos, the expanding earth, Velikovskianism, global warming denial, creationism, 9/11 denial, and a host of other follies, are not good science. They are pseudoscience, and you and MHz are fairly typical of the people who buy into them. You view yourselves as noble but beleaguered and lonely resistors of a corrupt and powerful elite group (which doesn't actually exist), and you know very little of what science actually is or how it works.