Did the CIA try to recruit 9-11 hijackers-the cover it up?

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
You make me literally lol. :)
I try...

I'm here all weak, try the veal.

 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
What are the symptoms of conspiracy thoughts? Does it start with wringing in the ears?
How about painful headaches that require sleeping in a dark room?
Every day like Entertainment Tonight we have a new belief and a conspiracy to shake the
foundation of society. This is not about information its about entertainment and some folks
need to feel important so they spread this crap like butter on bread.
I sometimes wonder who is crazy, the person who thinks this stuff up or the people who
believe them?
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
What are the symptoms of conspiracy thoughts? Does it start with wringing in the ears?
How about painful headaches that require sleeping in a dark room?
Every day like Entertainment Tonight we have a new belief and a conspiracy to shake the
foundation of society. This is not about information its about entertainment and some folks
need to feel important so they spread this crap like butter on bread.
I sometimes wonder who is crazy, the person who thinks this stuff up or the people who
believe them?

Tell us. What is the real truth, And what makes you so certain it IS THE REAL AND FACTUAL truth?? IF you think the USG is not capable of doing something that perverse and horrific.......either intentionally or by allowing it to happen while passively standing by and planning their next move......then it is You that are naive .

You make me literally lol. :)

glad you find it all so amusing. How many have died in the wars that the US had wanted so bad they were salivating .?? You find premeditated wars of greed (for territorial control and more power) and the horrors we have seen , FUNNY?? Maybe you should go over there and collect the bodies after one of the US bombings.........
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Tell us. What is the real truth, And what makes you so certain it IS THE REAL AND FACTUAL truth??
I know I don't know everything. I know I don't know the whole truth about many things.

But something I know absolutely, 100%, how to pick apart BS links, stories and posts, and expose peoples real faces.

glad you find it all so amusing. How many have died in the wars that the US had wanted so bad they were salivating .?? You find premeditated wars of greed (for territorial control and more power) and the horrors we have seen , FUNNY??
There you go, making it up again. When you stop doing that. More than just fellow nutters will think you have some cred and are more than just an anti American spammer.

What she does find funny, is me pointing out things like the "THEORY" in the very story you claimed wasn't a theory.
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
The truth is, these 911 theories are incredibly stale and boring. While the tin foilers will rail the CIA for being incompetent with the intelligence for the Iraq war they also believe the CIA is capable of pulling off a mass deception to the world for 10 years now, bi-polar to the extreme.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
The truth is, these 911 theories are incredibly stale and boring. While the tin foilers will rail the CIA for being incompetent with the intelligence for the Iraq war they also believe the CIA is capable of pulling off a mass deception to the world for 10 years now, bi-polar to the extreme.
Inconsistencies will be dismissed without a word.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
The truth is, these 911 theories are incredibly stale and boring. While the tin foilers will rail the CIA for being incompetent with the intelligence for the Iraq war they also believe the CIA is capable of pulling off a mass deception to the world for 10 years now, bi-polar to the extreme.

are you a psychiatrist so as to presume such a diagnosis.


It is silly to assume what folks actually believe. But it is narrow minded not to allow for the many questions that still remain unanswered and probably won't be for some time.

the question is: is it possible that there is a lot more than meets the eye / ie . the official story.? Keeping an open mind might be in order.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
are you a psychiatrist so as to presume such a diagnosis.
In the case of your posts, a degree isn't exactly a prerequisite to come to that valid conclusion.

It is silly to assume what folks actually believe.
That hasn't stopped you from doing just that.

But it is narrow minded not to allow for the many questions that still remain unanswered and probably won't be for some time.
That isn't what you do.
the question is: is it possible that there is a lot more than meets the eye / ie . the official story.?
Of course there is. But that doesn't mean you should throw commonsense and critical thought out the window.

Keeping an open mind might be in order.
Of course it is. You should actually try it sometime.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
12,410
1,377
113
60
Alberta
The truth is, these 911 theories are incredibly stale and boring. While the tin foilers will rail the CIA for being incompetent with the intelligence for the Iraq war they also believe the CIA is capable of pulling off a mass deception to the world for 10 years now, bi-polar to the extreme.

BEE AYE ENN GEE OHHH BEE AYE ENN GEE OHHH BEE AYE ENN GEE OHHH and Bingo was his name O!

are you a psychiatrist so as to presume such a diagnosis.

Admitting you have a problem is the first step to getting well again.

It is silly to assume what folks actually believe. But it is narrow minded not to allow for the many questions that still remain unanswered and probably won't be for some time.

It is stupid to argue with such theories because to do so is like analyzing a bowl of marshmallows.

the question is: is it possible that there is a lot more than meets the eye / ie . the official story.? Keeping an open mind might be in order.

No the question is: When are you Truthers going to grow up and move out of your moms basement?
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
BBC Question Time on 9/11

There will be a special edition of BBC Question Time from London on the topic of 9/11 on Sept 8.

We will give you a free RI911 t-shirt to wear on the day if you get a ticket.. To apply for tickets to be part of the audience you need to apply today, Saturday.

Application form can be found here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/question_time/1858613.stm

White House whistleblower Richard Clarke corroborates key allegations.

Ten years after 9/11 the official story is unravelling with new revelations from dissident security expert Richard Clarke, the then head of counter terrorism at the White House.

Clarke has given a bombshell interview to the film makers who made 911 Press For Truth providing more evidence for what many 9/11 sceptics have been saying for years: the 9/11 attacks were allowed to happen by officials in the CIA who could have stopped them, and mere incompetence cannot be the explanation. Clarke is not saying this was their intent, something that is hard to prove. But the question is now unavoidable: given that 9/11 resulted from gross misconduct by senior officials, why did America start two wars on the back of 9/11 when it should have been investigating and sacking officials at home.

Perhaps more important in the long run: why did the world's corporate media collude with an obviously flawed 9/11 story, and why did America's NATO allies fail to ask any questions before joining in?

Richard Clarke, the White House anti-terror czar had seen his power diminished by the Bush regime prior to 9/11, and after 9/11 wrote an intriguing book "Against all Enemies". This is a reference to the US oath of allegiance "against all enemies foreign and domestic". Note the "and domestic".

The book contained several bombshells but the mainstream media failed to follow up the leads Clarke offered and the book was ignored by many 9/11 sceptics because it ostensibly supported the official 9/11 story. Now Clarke is stirring things up again, drawing attention to one of the many crucial holes of the official 9/11 story: the failure to explain why the FBI was blocked from investigating some of the people who were later named as 9/11 hijackers. This was systematic and happened not to one FBI operation but to three that we know of.

Clarke has corroborated many of the claims and possibilities raised in this writer's book 911 The New Evidence. In particular he has confirmed that the CIA took a decision to protect the suspected 9/11 hijackers from investigation by the FBI, by law the lead agency in anti-terrorism matters. This bombshell confirms what many sceptics have been saying for years. Clarke concurs with 911 The New Evidence too over the three key suspects: Cofer Black, head of the CIA counter terrorism unit, the then CIA boss George Tenet (who later received a severe reprimand form his own Inspector General for undisclosed failings on 9/11) and the head of the CIA's Osama Bin Laden unit who has now been named as Richard Blee.

Clarke has confirmed that not only the FBI but the military were blocked by the CIA. The unnamed secret military unit that was also ordered off the case could be the Able danger team, who say they identifed alleged 9/11 ringleader Mohammed Atta as a key terrorist well before 9/11. Or it could refer to the mysterious Catchers Mitt operation referenced in 911 The New Evidence. In one of the many unlikely coincidences of 9/11, the same operational name was attached to the reinforcement of the section of the Pentagon Wall which was hit in the attacks.

Here are the key quotes from Clarke:

"George Tenet followed all of the information about al-Qaeda in microscopic detail," (contradicts Tenet's own statements and the general Washington line that no-one senior was aware of the Al Qaeda threat)

"It's not as I originally thought, which was that one lonely CIA analyst got this information and didn't somehow recognize the significance of it," Clarke said during the interview. "No, fifty, 5-0, CIA personnel knew about this. Among the fifty people in CIA who knew these guys were in the country was the CIA director... We therefore conclude that there was a high-level decision inside CIA ordering people not to share that information," (this refutes the tired old incompetence argument, it is also illegal in itself under the Clinto terrorism directives)

"It is also possible, as some FBI investigators suspect, the CIA was running a joint venture with Saudi intelligence in order to get around that restriction ... These are only theories about the CIA's failures to communicate vital information to the bureau ... Perhaps the agency decided that Saudi intelligence would have a better chance of recruiting these men than the Americans. That would leave no CIA fingerprints on the operation as well."

If you substitute Mossad for the Saudis, you have the explanation for the dancing Isrealis, apprehended for filming and celebrating as the Towers collapsed and released later on orders from the Bush administration. The existence of just such a Mossad/CIA 9/11 operation was claimed soon after 9/11 by UK journalist Gordon Thomas, based on his Mossad and CIA sources.

Ian Henshall


Former Counterterrorism Czar Accuses Tenet, Other CIA Officials of Cover-Up


as long as there remain questions, and doubt about the "official" story........ investigations and discussions will go on. Those that prefer to accept what they are told like non thinking, non questioning sheep.......that is your choice.

The truth is, these 911 theories are incredibly stale and boring. While the tin foilers will rail the CIA for being incompetent with the intelligence for the Iraq war they also believe the CIA is capable of pulling off a mass deception to the world for 10 years now, bi-polar to the extreme.

that is NOT the truth. That is YOUR OPINION. and as such.......is what it is. Everyone has one. The real TRUTH is a lot more difficult to ascertain in current day politics.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
12,410
1,377
113
60
Alberta
Gives RCS another negative rep.

You can give me all the Neg Reps you want, your theorizing about 911 is stupid and you really need to get a life. Durka suimmed it up. How is it the CIA cant fake a couple of WMD's in the Iraq desert, but can fool thousands into believing that boeing 737's loaded with fuel and passengers were crashed into the twin towers?

Only an idiot would argue with that, but wait.. It is all becoming very clear to me now.. You are an idiot, along with all the other idiots who need to get off the computer for awhile and maybe get some fresh air instead of ignoring the obvious.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
You can give me all the Neg Reps you want, your theorizing about 911 is stupid and you really need to get a life. Durka suimmed it up. How is it the CIA cant fake a couple of WMD's in the Iraq desert, but can fool thousands into believing that boeing 737's loaded with fuel and passengers were crashed into the twin towers?

Only an idiot would argue with that, but wait.. It is all becoming very clear to me now.. You are an idiot, along with all the other idiots who need to get off the computer for awhile and maybe get some fresh air instead of ignoring the obvious.

suit yourself. If the official explanation is fine by you .........why bother adding your snide comments to the topic.?? They add nothing except toxicity. which is counterproductive. Are you some kind ;of dictator that has a need to order others what to do and change their lifestyle.........as if you even know anyone's life style here. The arrogance and bullying is astounding. But one can only presume that you do what you do best.
Calling other posters names is just so uncool.
Could care less if you agree or disagree. This is a conversation......nothing more , nothing less. No one is absolutely right, or absolutely wrong. The concept is exposure to other views and ideas ...Is that too complex for some to comprehend??


More interested in hearing from minds who question the offical explanations. Richard Clarke is one of these people. When the show in the UK is presented , it will be fascinating to hear what others and a number of intellectuals have to say about it. It will be a stimulating and informative discussion.

Particularly since a lot of time has gone by, lots of events prompted by the act, more info is available and the distance of time enabling more objectivity & clearer thinking.
 
Last edited: