Devastating Assault on Women’s Health in America

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Devastating Assault on Women’s Health in America

By Claudia Chaufan

Global Research, March 12, 2011



From the Middle East to the Midwest, Let’s Stand up for the Rights of Women and Workers



As the world celebrates Women’s History Month, the U.S. House of Representatives has just launched the most devastating assault on women’s health in the history of our nation – a real case of state violence on a civilian population to achieve political goals.

If the House-passed bill is approved by the Senate and is signed into law by President Obama, Title X will be eliminated. Title X provides basic health services, including Pap smears, testing for sexually transmitted diseases, and cancer screenings to more than 5 million low-income people, disproportionately women, at a cost that is a fraction of the cost of waging at least two wars of aggression and funding over 700 overseas military bases and at least 6,000 such bases in the United States and its territories.

This bill would also cut $210 million from Maternal and Child Health Block Grants, that also serve poor women and children; the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would see a major cut in its funding, of $755 million, that would undermine a host of public health efforts, such as confronting HIV/AIDS; and Community Health Centers would see a $1.3 billion dollar cut that would brutally curtail services in a network of health centers in cities and rural areas providing essential primary care -- so much for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) expansion of funds for community clinics.

And it gets worse, and does not stop at our nation’s shores. The same legislation would also eliminate funding for the
United Nations Population Fund (UNPF), the agency providing family planning, maternity care, and sexually transmitted diseases prevention services, among many other services essential to women’s wellbeing, in some 150 countries.
This onslaught against women joins the one against working people generally, as calls to “save” Social Security and Medicare by slashing these programs multiply, and an increasing number of state legislators attempt to gut the collective bargaining rights of unions with the spurious argument that public sector employees just “earn too much” and receive “too generous benefits”.

While the subtleties of the discourse differ, not only the right but also sectors of th

( The evidence is clear, women are considered worthless eating meat puppets gumming up the corporate gears planet wide.( DB
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Why is cutting funding to the United Nations Population Control Fund a bad thing?

I wasn't thinking good or bad issue to issue just that women and children are the most vulnerable segments of society so they are invariably the easiest button to push when you want to do some social engineering in a hurry.
 

Skatchie

Time Out
Sep 24, 2010
312
0
16
41
Assiniboia
yeah, cutting anything form the UN is not a big deal. In fact, it should be dispanded anyways. corrupt globalist scum bags that they are.

As to the article, yeah it sounds like a bad deal. I just wonder how long it will be until the leftists actually come to their senses and realize Obama is not for them. He was brought in by Wall Street. This whole thing is a scam. His health reform, or so it's called, has actually only screwed over the middle class more than the crap they had before. True leftards like Kucinich didn't support it until they were bribed, er uh lobbied, to do so with threats of being black balled by the huge lobby interests in the big insurance lobby, which not only supported this bill but actually wrote it. Kucinich called it a bail out for the insurance agencies.

Then hero nuts, BO, goes and gives over a thousand huge companies waivers to not have to get insurance for their workers. Companies like MacDonalds. So now, Micky D's can employ your local pimple faced stoked saying swine youth for almost no cost to them and not provide health care, even for the full time swine, and your local family owned restaurant can't, so they are at an even bigger disadvantage. Man, Socialism so helps the middle class, doesn't it? Imbeciles.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
In the end, cutting any kind of health control for sexually transmitted diseases will have a trickle up effect, and undermine the health of the whole damn nation. I'm not going to touch the gender issue with a ten foot pole, as it's NOT women's funding, it's just used largely by women. Protecting families from STD's and unwanted welfare babies seems like something that should be a priority for any government, ALL the time.
 

Skatchie

Time Out
Sep 24, 2010
312
0
16
41
Assiniboia
In the end, cutting any kind of health control for sexually transmitted diseases will have a trickle up effect, and undermine the health of the whole damn nation. I'm not going to touch the gender issue with a ten foot pole, as it's NOT women's funding, it's just used largely by women. Protecting families from STD's and unwanted welfare babies seems like something that should be a priority for any government, ALL the time.

It's one thing to cut it, if the new system has a replacement for it. That's what I'm not sure of here. Is there some sort of funding somewhere in Obamacare that covers what they are cutting here?

Men under 30 are all fruitcakes and just as vulnerable.

hey!

I resent that. I'm not vulnerable. The fruit cake comment, I can't argue but vulnerable, no damn way!
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
In the end, cutting any kind of health control for sexually transmitted diseases will have a trickle up effect, and undermine the health of the whole damn nation. I'm not going to touch the gender issue with a ten foot pole, as it's NOT women's funding, it's just used largely by women. Protecting families from STD's and unwanted welfare babies seems like something that should be a priority for any government, ALL the time.

And there you have the advantage to TPTB in the incubation of gender on gender discontent. Just another place to drive a wedge in. No human issue is strictly male or female.