Democrats sue Russia, Trump and WikiLeaks for conspiracy to help Trump win

JJGreenberg

New Member
Jun 11, 2017
1
0
1
Richard Nixon also faced a lawsuit from the Democrats that they won on the day that Nixon resigned. It's amazing how history repeats itself.

The DNC were ridiculed by the press for the charges. It was said that their campaign was 9M in debt and they were trying to get the Republicans to bail them out with the lawsuit at the time. Nixon was even campaigning for re-election.

As you stated, The DNC won the case and the republicans quietly wrote them a cheque.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
12,409
1,375
113
60
Alberta
The Dems should sue themselves for arrogance. Hillary was the most unpalatable candidate a party could have run and I believe that they figured beating the now President McPussyGrab was a shoe in.

OOPS.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
She won the nomination.
Nomination by idiots, begging for it. The American voter will and has selected shjt to govern them, and now they cannot understand how it is that they stand neck deep in shjt. As they are fed into the Empire sausage maker them wave the flag right up untill the blades dice them into managable slices. Only an American civil war will produce a good president.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Well, after hillary burned bernie in the primary ( which we all know for sure, no argument about THAT at this point), you all should have quit then.

Did you get THAT?

after hillary burned bernie...

All the real people who voted ( as opposed to the illegals with drivers licenses that were bussed from polling station to polling station - vote early vote often ) were so disgusted...
Now we have to put up with, and listen to, the lies of a POOR loser while we wait for HER conviction.

HILLARY CLINTON ROBBED BERNIE SANDERS OF THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION, ACCORDING TO DONNA BRAZILE
http://www.newsweek.com/clinton-robbed-sanders-dnc-brazile-699421

QUIK!!! Wipe the servers, erase the emails, kill the whistleblowers and blame the russians!!!

...and people think THAT should have been president???
HOLY CRAP!!!!! VOTING SHOULD NOT BE A RIGHT: If you are such a poor loser AFTER cheating...
DON'T PLAY!

BTW..after that Superman show babe was arrested along with her sex freak boyfriend with all the slave beatches in New York this week...I'll bet she is singing to the LEOs for sure and turning in all the weiner freaks in the party.
 
Last edited:

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
Nomination by idiots, begging for it. The American voter will and has selected shjt to govern them, and now they cannot understand how it is that they stand neck deep in shjt.

Yeah, you got that right. The five of the last seven presidents were pretty much a loss for the United States.

Let's look at them - Ronald Reagan who jacked up military spending at the expense of social services and whose policies saw the failure of one American bank in three and a massive increase in the national debt.

George Bush senior who continued Reagan's policies and was voted out for his efforts, despite leading a successful war against Iraq.

Bill Clinton - A do-nothing president more interested in using his office to chase women than anything else.

George W. Bush - the disastrous Iraq war - the Wall Street meltdown and a further increase in the US national debt.

And now we have Trump - the most divisive and clueless president in US history. His damage so far is limited, mainly due to his own incompetence and the short time he has been in power.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
Bill Clinton a do-nothing president?

What an odd thing to say.
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
No, he's guilty of high treason for selling his country out to Russia.
Uh, yeah. If there was any actual proof of that, the DNC wouldn't be filing what is essentially a civil suit. Criminal courts want hard evidence whereas civil courts will accept circumstantial evidence. So it's pretty obvious the DNC doesn't have shit on Trump, Russia or Wikileaks. They're just desperately trying to keep the narrative going while they rely on memory impaired idiots to forget it was Hillary who approved the sale of US strategic assets to the Russians.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Uh, yeah. If there was any actual proof of that, the DNC wouldn't be filing what is essentially a civil suit. Criminal courts want hard evidence whereas civil courts will accept circumstantial evidence. So it's pretty obvious the DNC doesn't have shit on Trump, Russia or Wikileaks. They're just desperately trying to keep the narrative going while they rely on memory impaired idiots to forget it was Hillary who approved the sale of US strategic assets to the Russians.

There are other branches of the government working on the treason part, like the FBI.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
WIKILEAKS TO COUNTERSUE DEMOCRATS; “DISCOVERY IS GOING TO BE AMAZING FUN”
WikiLeaks To Countersue Democrats; "Discovery Is Going To Be Amazing Fun" | The Daily Sheeple


LOL MF doesn't realise what is actually going to happen here:

IN BOTH LAWSUITS the facts are going to come out in court (DISCOVERY), and that is going to lead to the complete LEGAL death of the democra...I mean nazicommieglobalists.
( For example the DNC will have to give up their servers...oh and then there is Haiti...)

There are other branches of the government working on the treason part, like the FBI.

Yes ( see above) the FBI have to give themselves a trumphating lobotomy just above the ears first...
:)
and they will.