it sure is very enigmatic isn’t it?
It's the creator Soc.;-)
it sure is very enigmatic isn’t it?
I'm not surprised, I don't see it either on re-reading my post. Not one of my better thought out statements. It was late and I was tired. You're right, joules per coulomb is one way to understand volts, which is indeed energy per unit of charge. What I was really thinking at the time was that you can't approach a complex problem in magnetohydrodynamics as if it were simple electrical circuits.
You see filaments in that WMAP image? I guess you'll see what you want to see to support your pseudoscience. It's called pariedolia, perceiving structures in randomness. Do you know how tiny the differences between the hottest and coldest spots on that image are?>> The most important result from WMAP is the filamentary structure and (red) hot spots in the microwave background.
You see filaments in that WMAP image? I guess you'll see what you want to see to support your pseudoscience. It's called pariedolia, perceiving structures in randomness. Do you know how tiny the differences between the hottest and coldest spots on that image are?
That's the main trouble with you electric cosmos guys, you rarely put numbers on your claims so people can actually see the details of what you're claiming. When you do, as Donald Scott sometimes does, it's easy to show with fairly elementary physics, as Tom Bridgman does at that link both #juan and I have given you several times now, that they can't possibly be right or there would be other effects that simply aren't detected, and there are effects that *are* detected that shouldn't be. The magnetic field from an electric current energetic enough to power the sun, for instance, would completely overpower the earth's magnetic field, compasses wouldn't work. But they do, so the current can't be there. There would be no electrons in the solar wind if the sun had the billion volt excess positive charge required by the electric cosmos claims. But there are equal numbers of positive and negative charges in the solar wind, so the sun has to be electrically neutral.
Electric Gravity in an Electric Universe
Einstein in his special theory of relativity postulated there was no medium, called the ‘aether.’ But Maxwell’s theory of electromagnetism requires it. And Sir Oliver Lodge saw the aether as crucial to our understanding. So Einstein, at a stroke, removed any possibility that he, or his followers, would find a link between electromagnetism and gravity. It served the egos of his followers to consecrate Einstein’s ideas and treat dissent as blasphemy. “Sometimes a concept is baffling not because it is profound but because it's wrong.”[9,10]
Decades later, Paul R. Heyl wrote in Scientific Monthly, May 1954:
“The more we study gravitation, the more there grows upon us the feeling that there is something peculiarly fundamental about this phenomenon to a degree that is unequalled among other natural phenomena. Its independence of the factors that affect other phenomena and its dependence only upon mass and distance suggest that its roots avoid things superficial and go down deep into the unseen, to the very essence of matter and space.” —Gravitation: Still A Mystery.
This sentiment has been echoed down to the present but few are listening. The problem has been worsened by the particle physicists who indulge in their own virtual reality — inventing “virtual particles” to transmit forces. If they “could understand the structure of the particle, in terms of the medium of which it is composed” and put flesh on the metaphysical bones of quantum theory we should be much further advanced. Sir Oliver Lodge deserves to be heard once more:
“..it may be that when the structure of an electron is understood, we shall see that an ‘even-powered’ stress in the surrounding aether is necessarily involved. What I do feel instinctively is that this is the direction for discovery, and what is needed is something internal and intrinsic, and that all attempts to explain gravitation as due to the action of some external agency, whether flying particles or impinging waves, are doomed to failure; for all these speculations regard the atom as a foreign substance -- a sort of ‘grit’ in the aether -- driven hither and thither by forces alien to itself. When, some day, we understand the real relation between matter and aether, I venture to predict that we shall perceive something more satisfying than that.”
If we find the answer to this phenomenon we may find ourselves closer to 'god'. But maybe not. Uncovering the aether will most likely open another round of unanswered questions.
You see filaments in that WMAP image? I guess you'll see what you want to see to support your pseudoscience. It's called pariedolia, perceiving structures in randomness. Do you know how tiny the differences between the hottest and coldest spots on that image are?