Council of Candians have done their homework!

cyberclark

Electoral Member
ELECTION 2006
January 13, 2006

In response to the predictions of a Conservative majority government, the Council of Canadians has joined forces with other social justice groups and unions from across the country to issue this statement about the potential dangers of such an outcome. The statement was released this morning at a press conference in Toronto with the signatory groups.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Think Twice on January 23

Representatives from the child care, Aboriginal, women’s rights, health care, equality rights, environmental, arts, trade union, and advocacy groups have a message for all Canadians.

What would Conservative policies mean for Canadians?

They mean privatization and deregulation, and more cuts to social programs.

They mean the end of the national child care programme, and the rollback of the $5 billion deal between ten provinces and the federal government. This is the beginning of the first new national social programme since Medicare, but Harper says he will cancel it in exchange for a dollar a day sent to Canadians, burdened with securing and financing their own childcare.

They mean abandonment of the agreement just achieved with First Nations at the Aboriginal Summit, and reneging on promised spending to alleviate a housing and health care crisis for some of Canada’s most vulnerable citizens, women and children.

They mean more greenhouse gas emissions, the end of the domestic Kyoto plan to reduce emissions by 2012, and moving Canada from a strong supporter of further emission cuts to supporting George Bush’s camp.

They mean a health care system based on commercialization, not patient needs; based on competition between health care providers, not collaborative practice; a health care system that would allocate public health care dollars to for-profit business, rather than improving primary health care for our families; and a continuing absence of national standards for home care and inadequate long-term care for our seniors.

They mean the loss of at least $1 billion for affordable housing, and the potential loss of a Canadian housing framework. They mean no commitment to the income measures and services needed to reduce poverty.

They mean abandoning efforts to protect workers’ wages, pensions and benefits in cases of corporate bankruptcy.

They mean massive tuition fee increases for university and college students.

They mean greater trade and foreign policy integration with the U.S., particularly joint military ventures (including participation in foreign conflicts and space-based military systems).

They mean new risks to Canadian women’s right to reproductive choice and access to abortion.

They mean abandoning plans for new pay equity legislation.

They mean abandoning plans for a new national strategy for people with disabilities.

They mean less government support for the arts and for public broadcasting.

They mean re-opening the debate over equal marriage rights for same sex couples, and the introduction of unconstitutional legislation.

They mean re-opening the Charter to protect private property rights, which have major implications for environmental protection, labour rights, and equality rights.

They mean big tax cuts for corporations, and less pollution regulations.

We are very concerned about the future of our country. Many of the victories Canadians have achieved over generations, and many important new programs and initiatives that are poised to become reality, are very much at risk.

We are standing up for Canada. We want a Canada with strong social programs, environmental protection, and fairness for everyone. Canadians need to think twice.

Endorsed By:
Child Care Advocacy Association of Canada
Council of Canadians
Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions
Canadian Federation of Students
Canadian Auto Workers
Centre for Equality Rights in Accommodation
Egale Canada
National Association of Women and the Law
Prevent Cancer Coalition
Shelagh Day, Human Rights Advocate
Elizabeth May, Environmentalist & Officer of the Order of Canada
LINK
--
700-170 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, ON K1P 5V5.
Tel: (613) 233-2773; Toll-free: 1-800-387-7177
Fax: (613) 233-6776
 

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
RE: Council of Candians h

Good.

I hope they re-open the charter to include private proprety rights. That would be a big step towards increasing liberty and justice.
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
They sure are getting worried out there.... :)
 

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
Charter Negotiations

I hope, personally, that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms remains "as-is." I would fear that the proposal of the Honourable Stephen Harper could lead to the compromise of equality rights, and the remainder of the Charter.
 

KanBob

Nominee Member
Jan 11, 2006
71
0
6
Alberta
cyberclark said:
... but Harper says he will cancel it in exchange for a dollar a day sent to Canadians, burdened with securing and financing their own childcare.

Just one one of the pieces of false crap in this announcement. $1,200 a year is not $1 a day. Where did these people learn to do math? And for families with more than one child, it could mean $2,400 or $3,600 a year.

So how many more lies are they trying to perpetuate in SCARY document?

This is just baseless fearmongering by deserves no respect and shows an entire lack of credibility. Kind of like the Liberal campaign.
 

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
KanBob, calm down. "Dollar a day" is an idiomatic expression, meaning "very little." There's no reason to always be on the offensive, with all due respect.
 

Calberty

Electoral Member
Dec 7, 2005
277
0
16
'Council of Canadians'

Woooooooo.....wooooo.

Bob Rae and Svend Robinson have both been members.
Now that gives them credibility. wooooo....woooo.
 

KanBob

Nominee Member
Jan 11, 2006
71
0
6
Alberta
Re: RE: Council of Candians have done their homework!

FiveParadox said:
KanBob, calm down. "Dollar a day" is an idiomatic expression, meaning "very little." There's no reason to always be on the offensive, with all due respect.

It's not an idiomatic expression. It's a blatant falsehood.
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
I think they should change their name. Clearly they only support certain Canadians.
 

the caracal kid

the clan of the claw
Nov 28, 2005
1,947
2
38
www.kdm.ca
Re: RE: Council of Candians h

Toro said:
Good.

I hope they re-open the charter to include private proprety rights. That would be a big step towards increasing liberty and justice.

interesting view. i disiagree. we should not be enshrining any kind of private property rights in the charter. liberty and justice is not found in private property, but in the reduction of private property.
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Re: RE: Council of Candians h

the caracal kid said:
Toro said:
Good.

I hope they re-open the charter to include private proprety rights. That would be a big step towards increasing liberty and justice.

interesting view. i disiagree. we should not be enshrining any kind of private property rights in the charter. liberty and justice is not found in private property, but in the reduction of private property.

Private property increases quality of life, look at Latin America.
 

MMMike

Council Member
Mar 21, 2005
1,410
1
38
Toronto
Re: Charter Negotiations

FiveParadox said:
I hope, personally, that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms remains "as-is." I would fear that the proposal of the Honourable Stephen Harper could lead to the compromise of equality rights, and the remainder of the Charter.

:?: There is only one person in the race that would change the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and that is Paul Martin.
 

Said1

Hubba Hubba
Apr 18, 2005
5,338
70
48
52
Das Kapital
sanch said:
It is obvious that the Council of Canadians and the Canadian Federation of Students have really protected students from massive tuition hikes during the liberal regime. Be interesting to see how they define "massive."

http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/040902/c040902a.gif

At least you don't get expelled for missing the fee deadline. That happened to me once. And I owe from last semester too. :cry:
 

cyberclark

Electoral Member
The inference is he has stated he is going to do away with the billions in child care programs and replace them with a token of money per child per household. Someone has extrapolated that 2 or 3 kids would bring in about 1200 bucks, far less than what the LIberals have put in.

Yes, it's a wipe out. In Harpers scheme the money is going to people who have absolutly no interest in day care.

The description of a buck a day and 1200 a year are totally in line!

It neat how you can view the Fraser Institue as being forward thinking and when Parklands Institute or the Council of Canadians has a turn a the press you label them with a negative lable.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
You should really have some idea what you are talking about before you post.

Martin was going to create a country wide child care system (Ha!) by giving money to the provinces that might, or might not, be used to create spaces.

This is totally useless to most of the working poor, as Martin's plan was to create 250,000 spaces, which is less than 20% of what is needed. As well, professional child care institutions run 5 days a week, say 7 AM to 5:30.

The working poor rarely work 9 to 5. Instead, they work weekends, evenings, night shifts.

So who does work 9 to 5? Comfortable upper-middle class professionals. Studies in Quebec have shown these wealthy Canadians use day care in greatly disproportionate numbers.

In other words, Martin's plan is a welfare scheme for the well-to-do.

On the other hand, Harper intends to give each family $1200 per year per child to help them with their responsibilities, to help them pay day care, or Grandma, or the neighbourhood stay at home Mom, or to help one parent stay at home.

He also intends to give tax incentives for companies to create day care spaces ON SITE.

Now, which plan will help the most people, and those that need it most?
 

Calberty

Electoral Member
Dec 7, 2005
277
0
16
sanch said:
It is obvious that the Council of Canadians and the Canadian Federation of Students have really protected students from massive tuition hikes during the liberal regime. Be interesting to see how they define "massive."

http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/040902/c040902a.gif

Since they've done such a great job at keeping tuitions low it must be time for a raise in tuition to bring costs up and take the burden off workers. The NDP will have to add mandatory tuition hikes to their platform.